The Reductionist Theory Of Religion

Improved Essays
When studying religion, there are two common techniques used to analyze and interpret religion: the non-reductionist approach and the reductionist approach. Non-reductionists do not believe religion can be broken down into simpler terminology. For this paper, I will be focusing on reductionism and providing examples from people we’ve talked about in class this semester. The reductionist approach focuses on explaining religion completely in human terms. Reductionists use non-religious reasonings and explanations to explain things instead of relying upon religious explanations. Psychological, economical, and societal terminology may be used. Throughout this essay, I will reference the works of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Russell McCutcheon, and Friedrich Nietzsche. These are the four main …show more content…
He believes religion is a social activity. People participle in religious events just to be apart of the group. Religion is a tool that helps people act in society. People are not religious for their own morality or salvation, but to seem moral and correct based on society’s standards. He thinks people are religious just to appear like they are good people. Instead of using religious terminology, he uses psychology and sociology. Durkheim reduces religion to a product of society. This is another example of reductionism.
Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher and cultural critic. He believed religion and most everything derived from human’s will to power. People want to achieve and be ambitious. People are religious and moral because they have the priest as an example. They strive to reach his example. If the priest is held so high in the eyes of society and God, then people also want to mimic his behavior and be successful. To Nietzsche, religion represents the sacrifice of freedom. Religion is synonymous with morality. When religion can be broken down into non-religious concepts that is the main idea of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I agree with what the author said because every religion is started by an individual or a group of people, and it is the founding fathers morals that get to shape the morals of the religion. Even with this, the religion morals keep on changing has people receive new revelations. Hence we see that everyone is equipped with morality, and religion tries to enforce these morality by attaching rules around them and getting their members tied to these rules. In the book, Riveted, the author hinted to the confirmation bias that religious people face, in-that some religious people may change their minds about whether something is morally acceptable or not and then claim that God agrees with the their new moral stance. This way of thinking can be denoted has a confirmation bias because they accept, seek out, and remember things that support their view.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However religion does need society to exist. Durkheim states that religion is essential to people because society is essential to us, therefore religion is essential to society, however I don’t believe that religion is essential to people due to atheism and science. I also like how Geertz explain that religion changes to adapt to people because people change all the time. It’s weird that religion changes because supposedly the sacred scriptures are from God, written down by a prophet. And since that’s the case, it should be counted as a sacred text that should not be changed.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim vied god as both a liberating and a constraining force in life. God is great and inspires people to do things they probably couldn’t do. Inspiring, protecting, understanding and a figure that lays foundations of modern law with what’s right and wrong. This is why religion is such a fundamental portion of functionalist societies, especially those with mechanical solidarities, God and religion have inspired modern law by instilling morals, shaped the importance of marriage, and many people believe that God has given them a purpose in life, such as Durkheim’s belief that everyone has a purpose or…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The emotional involvement in Christian worship service is very important in understanding how powerful the collective group is. Research should be more interested in this point, and in how the prominence of religion and its power is understood through religious participation. This argument also supports Durkheim’s (1912) ideas that religion is responsible for social integration. I argue that people wouldn’t attach themselves so strongly to their religious group unless they felt some sort of solidarity, produced by the collective power of the group. Despite challenges to this idea in Bellah’s work, he also quotes Durkheim and says that, “It is a singular error to present individualist morality as the antagonist of Christian morality; on the contrary it is derived from it” (1970, p. 91).…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He first describes morality as a connection between people. He sees behaivor as the main component that builds up that connection, and clearly views religion as the best option to achieve it. Lewis then states that individual spirituality should be wanted in order to achieve solicitude and passion with God in Christianity. Lewis expresses his belief by saying, “You cannot make men good by law: and without good men you cannot have a good society” (73). People should desire a “good” spirit, similar to God, instead of being forced by the law of human nature.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They want us to believe that they know how we should live and what is right and wrong. People give into this fact and allow priests to see that it’s what gives them power and meaning. Nietzsche knew that if people kept giving in, priests would continue to feed off the power that the people give them. Nietzsche believes as well that “As long as the priest is considered a higher type of man—this professional negator, slanderer, and poisoner of life—there is no answer to the question: what is truth?” (Sec 8, 575). If we continue to give into the belief that priests hold what is the truth and what is a lie, then they have won.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, he thinks no one realized how much faith you actually need to have to be a follower of Christianity. Nietzsche believed that organized religion was something people used to avoid ideas like death by coming up with nice sounding alternatives to what happens, but you have to follow a certain set a rules placed by the ones that made the religion. Also, he felt it helped with mankind’s morality by protecting them from things that they do not know…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reflection About Religion

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Religion provides hope for a better future to the average believer; however, in my eyes I see religion growing into a form of discrimination. Not discrimination of race, age or looks but of a person 's morals and values. If someone commits a horrible act in a society, they are told they will not be accepted by their god. Religion, should be something that causes no problems or fights or arguments. Religion should be a personal belief…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    by this he referred as to why we should believe in God when we learned of him by reading and listening, and learned by society to look up to him as a superior being, and that instead we should focus on the present and be men of character. In my opinion religion has been a key to society becoming a better person. People who are religious know what is wrong and right, in order to reach salvation one must be kind to one another and follow certain, not rules, but a guidance left for us to have a better life in this…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weber was more of an interpretivist and felt actions were very important in his studies. Even with ontology, Weber studied people’s intentions and motives, while Durkheim focused on the structural aspect of society. This paper will study how each sociologist contributed to society with their different viewpoints. Durkheim and Weber both agreed that religion affects people generally speaking. They each believed religion would forever stay alive; however, Durkheim believed religion was absolutely necessary for society to exist.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics