Near the end of Apology, as Socrates approaches death, he presents a rather complex argument concluding that death must be a blessing. This paper focuses on the reconstruction of Socrates’ argument, analyzing its quality, and ultimately concluding whether or not it has merit. After observing two examples of faulty arguments, the reconstruction of Socrates verbal logic is presented and each assertion is examined carefully. This examination will focus on each assertion individually and will thoroughly justify any logical gaps through the use of unstated premises. From this careful examination of Socrates propositions, one can conclude that Socrates put forth a faulty argument. Before Socrates logic is determined flawed, one must understand the
…show more content…
There are countless beliefs on the nature of death, and to limit the possibilities down to only two choices seems foolish. As a third outcome consider the possibility of reincarnation. Already one can conclude that there are more than 2 viable possibilities regarding death. This bold statement made by Socrates is not only incorrect, but the statement is contradictory to his previous testimonials within Apology “…he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know, neither do I think I know…” (Apology …show more content…
There are infinitely many possibilities regarding the nature of death, so I must not rule out the likelihood that this individual statement is false. It is equally probable that one 's soul does relocate to the same place as fallen heroes, but cannot interact with them.
P9. To be able to converse and meet with ancient heroes in the afterlife would be a blessing (Stated). As we concluded above, if something is superior to its alternative, then it is a blessing. I trust that being able to communicate and interact with noble souls after death would be much better than not being able to do so. Thus I would have to agree with Socrates that this would, in fact, be a blessing.
Now that each premise has been carefully examined, one can use the given information to conclude whether or not Socrates argument is of any
There are countless beliefs on the nature of death, and to limit the possibilities down to only two choices seems foolish. As a third outcome consider the possibility of reincarnation. Already one can conclude that there are more than 2 viable possibilities regarding death. This bold statement made by Socrates is not only incorrect, but the statement is contradictory to his previous testimonials within Apology “…he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know, neither do I think I know…” (Apology …show more content…
There are infinitely many possibilities regarding the nature of death, so I must not rule out the likelihood that this individual statement is false. It is equally probable that one 's soul does relocate to the same place as fallen heroes, but cannot interact with them.
P9. To be able to converse and meet with ancient heroes in the afterlife would be a blessing (Stated). As we concluded above, if something is superior to its alternative, then it is a blessing. I trust that being able to communicate and interact with noble souls after death would be much better than not being able to do so. Thus I would have to agree with Socrates that this would, in fact, be a blessing.
Now that each premise has been carefully examined, one can use the given information to conclude whether or not Socrates argument is of any