The Reasons Of The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
One of our country’s biggest conflicts between what is right or wrong is the death penalty. The death penalty is known for punishing criminals of mass crimes such as murder; the death penalty is the capital punishment for a murderer that is convicted or guilty of the crime. I don’t support the death penalty, I side with the eighteen states that have abolished the death penalty in our nation. This means thirty-one states are using the death penalty as a punishment. I believe that the death penalty should be abolished in the United States, there are many reasons how our country would benefit from not using this type of punishment. One of the three main reasons I use to back up this reason is cost, effectiveness, and rehabilitation. The number …show more content…
You would think that executing people who have killed others would slow down the rate of murderers and crimes. But no that’s not the case; murder rates have been overall the same and haven’t had a significant drop in years. Many government officials say themselves that capital punishment doesn’t work. In 1976 the amount of murders in the U.S. was 18,780. In 2015, the amount of murders in the U.S. was 15,696. This statistics shows that there was barely any change from when the death penalty was first approved till now. According to a survey of the former and present presidents of the top criminological societies, eighty-eighty percent of the experts reject the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder. Then a 2009 poll commissioned by DPIC found that police chiefs ranked the death penalty as last among the ways to reduce violent crime. Ninety-four percent of them agreed there was little empirical evidence to support the deterrent effect of the death penalty. When states that have death penalty laws are compared to states without death penalty laws the crimes rates are the same. According to North Carolina department of justice, the murder rate has declined the past years since the last execution in 2006. Nationally, murder rates are significantly lower in states that don’t use the death penalty. Prosecutors themselves are trying to reduce death sentences as well, since 1999 number of death row sentences has …show more content…
Retribution is just another word for revenge, as humans we desire revenge but its’s the lowest human emotion. To kill a person who killed someone close to you isn’t actually revenge, it’s just continuing the cycle of violent crime. Avenging a crime committed to another individual is understandable, but killing someone for murdering another is also unconstitutional. The death penalty also fails to rehabilitate the murderer of his or her crime. Rehabilitation is the act of trying to help bring back the original state of the criminal during their jail time. When a criminal is serving life in jail with no parole they have the opportunity to change their character while serving their time. When a criminal is placed on death row, they lose a little bit of their human dignity and our automatically discriminated of their right to live. If the death penalty was eliminated there could be many programs that could be used to help a person rehabilitate while in prison. Death penalty closes the door all the doors for the criminal to acknowledge his or her mistakes. By abolishing the death penalty it will give an immense opportunity for the criminal in altering their behavior. As well as diminishing our justice system of proceeding for revenge on the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Burns this punishment should be death, but what about the person’s fundamental rights 's to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Although Burns does not directly address it in this chapter, I believe he feels that when you commit a crime you lose these fundamental rights. But are these not fundamental rights that everyone is guaranteed under the Constitution? Their is no clause in the Constitution that says unless your a murder, you lose these rights. Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypocritical Death Penalty

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages

    actually have lower murder rates than those with the death penalty, majority of studies find that the death penalty has no deterrent effect over and above the alternative sentence of life in prison without release, according to Professors John Donohue and Justin Wolfers, their view is that the death penalty deters is still the product of belief, not evidence; meaning that the death penalty may increase the murder rate as a deterrent, and individual states and cities such as Manhattan murder rate gradually dropped ten years and Chicago’s murder rate dropped by nearly a third during the first seven years after the state suspended executions. [6] Most importantly, reports have found that capital punishment has flaws that do not factor in the…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty Must Be Executed Murder is defined as ‘the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another’. Isn’t this the definition of capital punishment? The death penalty should be executed, it was and always will be a morally corrupt system, teaching society that it is unacceptable to kill, but to kill a killer is acceptable. The number of humans who were innocent, mentally ill or executed for the sole purpose of preventing future crime is unknown and will remain so until the death penalty is sentenced to death itself. Why should the death penalty remain?…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would give the citizens a feeling of safety knowing a potential threat will not be on the loose again. Also, a serial killer should be sentenced to death because serial killers have committed the act of murder multiple times. After the first time someone might regret killing a human being but a serial killer feels no remorse for the victims he has hurt, and therefore, should just die. An adherent of this position may believe that it would be fair for the victim’s family to decide the fate of the criminal since the criminal decided the fate of the victim. Another belief held would be that it is the job of the…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values. Many people in the United States are facing the punishment of death row. The death penalty is used to kill a person who has been convicted of inhumane crimes. Those who are for the death penalty think it is “ preventing serious harm to innocent people and a weighty reason for using a particular penalty (as in doing justice)”(Davis…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I want closure if something happened; I want them to be punished for that. I would feel like prison is not enough for that, even a life sentence. The death penalty is wrong but is it better to have them dead? I grew up on the basis that killing, even hurting someone is morally wrong. Not only that, the law even states that too.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (1350)Against the Death Penalty: An Analysis of Reiman’s “Moderate” Retribution Theory This argument against the death penalty will examine the “moderate retribution theory of Jeffrey Reiman. In this theory, the premise of retribution for murder defines the validation of the death penalty, yet not in the abuse of justice found in the American criminal justice system. Reiman believes that the death penalty should be abolished because criminals are not always cognitively aware of the crimes that they commit, which demands the rehabilitation of the individual. Reiman argues against the death penalty because it offers an extreme form of punishment for crimes that are rarely “conscious” in the mind of the criminal. This moderate form of retribution…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Death Penalty: A Punishment to Be Abolished Death penalty or Capital punishment has been a controversial issue for centuries. According to Duhaime legal dictionary, it is the sentence of death imposed on a convicted criminal (duhaime.org). But why does the law in certain countries enforce the killing of murderers to show that killing people is wrong? Supporters of death penalty think that it is essential to execute people for committing crimes in order to achieve justice and to lower crime rates ; however , opponents of this claim believe that death penalty in a developed society is morally and reasonably unacceptable. For supporters of anti death penalty, the idea that capital punishment stops criminals from committing…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics