Socrates In The Apology Analysis

Improved Essays
In the Apology Socrates is accused of being an atheist and corrupting the youth by Meletus, and other people who Socrates “tested their wisdom”. They are strongly offended by Socrates’ words, and decided to bring Socrates to this trial to get him punished. Socrates has defended himself, and he is not guilty of any accuses. However, the jurors, on behalf of the whole citizen body of Athens, decide that Socrates is guilty, and the punishment is a death penalty rather than an exile. Behind this death penalty, Socrates seems to prefer this than an exile, because he does not want to live in a society that he cannot do what he wants to do. Then, in the Crito, Socrates refuses to be rescued by Crito and Socrates’ friends. Crito tried to convince Socrates …show more content…
I think Socrates wants the death penalty with the main reason being that an imprisonment or an exile will put him into a position that he cannot continue his mission, as he says, “if I say that it is the greatest food for a man to discuss virtue every day and those other things about which you hear me conversing and testing myself and others, for the unexamined life is not worth living for men, you will believe me even less” (Apology, 38a). I also think that there is another reason, receiving death penalty will create a curiosity for next generation to discuss about his death. The most important evidence about this argument is the fact that we are arguing about his death penalty. If Socrates were to choose an exile, the story would have been totally different. It is also interesting to look back at the Allegory of the Cave by Plato about the killing of the “enlightened” man. Socrates thinks that the people who control the prisoners in the cave would kill the “enlightened” man because it would stop the whole idea, however, it certainly will not. Nothing can stop the truth, and killing the man would make other people more curious about what he has done. Comparing to Socrates receiving death penalty, I think these two stories share a similar concept of how to provoke people passive-aggressively to be more curious

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If he had not carried out his sentence, then justice would not have served. This would contradict his teachings and his actions. Even though Socrates opposed democracy, he went through with his punishment; death by poison. If he was really anti-democracy, he would have never agreed to a trial. “However, as opposed to Socrates the citizen who sometimes praises other regimes, ‘Socrates the philosopher desires democracy’.10 Indeed, within the discussion of the decline of the regimes Socrates is ‘actually engaged in a defense of democracy against its enemies the potential tyrants’, the timocratic Spartans.11” (Klonoski 11).…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Resistance as a civic virtue Laws are not standard. They changes from state to state and obviously from country to country. Athenians judicial system condemned to death a man for having different beliefs than theirs and based in Apology and Crito by Plato in this essay I claim that Socrates’ acceptance of death under a failing judicial system is unvirtuous although he tries to picture it as a virtuous and civic act. His aberration for obeying the outcome of his trial becomes pointless because if he wants to be virtuous he must go against the system showing resistance. Socrates has to continue fighting back the unfair system that condemns him and convince others to join his cause Should we follow the many or the one?…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, his goal was to exploit these problems and the best way to do that was through demonstration. I think if a person is once put on trial, he knows his punishment will be death, no matter how innocent he is concerned with the law of Athens. Throughout the trials of Socrates, he arguments doesn’t make much sense, but I know for a fact that Socrates wasn’t trying to be let free of this trial. He wants to be punished and then accept the punishment which I feel like I’m reading a superhero book or something because this makes him seem like a hero of some sort. Anyways, Socrates knows that the only way Athens will see they are wrong is if they watch him die and realize the punishment did not fit the crime, and notice the fact that there was no crime committed at…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cirto brings up the point that leaving his sons without a father is wrong, but Socrates reminds Crito that he would be doing worse by making his sons have a criminal for a father. Also he would be breaking everything Socrates stands for because he would break the social construct that he believed in, and become a hypocrite, by defying what he taught. By repaying evil with evil you are not achieving anything. This depicting how much Socrates focuses on being true to your moral values, and being ethical. Socrates also displayed his ability to question and not be so narrow minded.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates quickly and eloquently began to discuss about his idea and how he is willing to die for this idea. Socrates stated so powerfully, “If you think that by killing men you can prevent some one from censuring your evil lives, you are mistaken… the easiest and the noblest way is not to be disabling others, but to be improving yourselves.” (Plato, 1909-14) This statement along describes how powerful Socrates was then and still is today. This wise man, which refused any payment for his teachings, was a direct conflict with the Athenian government. Once he stated that if he was released of all the accusations against him based on the conditions that he would remain quiet and no longer question Athenian society, he would say, “I, men of Athens, salute and love you, but I will obey the god rather than you; and as long as I breathe and able to, I will certainly not stop philosophizing.” So Socrates would rather die than be silent and walk the earth. In conclusion, Socrates real charge should have been questioning the status quo in Athens and inspiring people to start to question people about their qualifications.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Apology And Crito

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates tried to prove himself innocent but failed. Later, he was given the death penalty because Athenians saw death as the solution to stop the spread of his philosophical beliefs. Socrates accepted this verdict and evaluated the implications of fleeing with his friend Crito. Based on the dialogues Apology and Crito by Plato I claim that Socrates’ acceptance of death under a failing judicial system is unvirtuous although he tries to frame it as virtuous and civic. The virtue of obeying the trial’s outcome is undercut as resistance would have been a better way to fight back the system that condemns Socrates unjustly.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote is told by Socrates when Meletus accused him of corrupting the youth, saying that he did not know that it was bad for the youth to leave their families and follow him. If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates accepted the death penalty for corrupting the minds of the youth with his philosophies. Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Socrates knows that Simonides would not agree that a crazy man should be given his weapon back simply because the weapon belong to the man. Socrates knows that Simonides must have a motive for reasoning and must mean something else, something that maybe Socrates cannot understand. Polemarchus then tries to explain to Socrates that what Simonides really meant is that the friends should only do well to each other, and not hurt each other. So then Socrates questions Polermarchus again and asks him if that means that if Simonides also mean that you should do harm to your enemies. Polermarchus says that that’s exactly what Simonides means and again Socrates does not agree with this definition of justice.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People hate Socrates because he claims that having wisdom is knowing that everyone does not know everything. Socrates is therefore the wisest man because he does not pretend to know things and knows that he does not know everything. Meletus is accusing Socrates of corrupting the youth because Socrates caused people to question the wisdom…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics