Who Is David Hume Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
For Hume, the idea of “reason” refers to inductive reasoning, or the ability to make associations between different things, and to recognize cause and effect. He argues that animals learn things two ways: from observation, and from instinct (Hume, pg. 71,72). Both of his ideas are persuasive, especially when looking at the behavior of chimpanzees and their use of tools. However, his argument that animals learn based on experience or observation is slightly more persuasive than his argument that animals are ruled by custom or instinct.

One argument of Hume’s is that animals learn things based on experiences of cause and effect. He expands on this by giving an example of a horse not attempting to jump higher than it knows it can from past experience (Hume, pg. 68). This account of the reason of animals is persuasive because it can be seen as true
…show more content…
Hume does not address every aspect of how animals might have reason, but the two points he does make are both convincing. His first point – that animals learn based on experience – is especially convincing because it is something that can be seen in daily life, like when I see my dog repeatedly lift his paw in an attempt to get a treat. Hume’s second argument – that animals are ruled by custom or instinct – is less persuasive than his previous point, but is still applicable, as seen by the various groups of chimpanzees all utilizing various objects as tools, without seeming to have been taught to do so. The reason Hume’s second argument is less persuasive than the first, is that the second argument does not seem like it can be proved independent of the first argument – using the chimpanzee example, it is impossible to know whether a chimpanzee is using tools due to instinct, or is using tools because it had seen other chimpanzees using tools

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Descartes argues that although animals are living, organic creatures, they are essentially automata, like mechanical robots. On the other hand, Hume asserts that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events through experience, rather than through means of reason. While both Descartes and Hume hold juxtaposed positions on animal behavior,…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay-2 CHALLENGE FROM MARGINAL CASES Having gone through the ‘Challenge from Marginal Cases: in the Article “Puppies, Pigs and People”, it seems the author Alastair Norcross is of the view that any mutilation or torture to non-human animals is morally impermissible irrespective of the actions of Fred’s behavior and torture of the animals or slaughtering or mutilation of farmed animals. He argues that there is no difference as the animal is mutilated in either case. In one case Fred tortures his puppies directly to obtain cocoamone for his pleasure whereas in other case farmed animals are slaughtered to cater the need of the people. From the above I feel, Fred is a rare consumer of cocoamone and the way he treats or torture puppies himself in an unorganized way and keep animal…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer makes a substantial argument regarding animal ethics, and although the term ‘specicism’ has existed for some time, Singer really brings popular attention towards it. In order to make a firm decision on the plausibility of Singer’s argument, I will be looking closely at Shelley Kagan, who criticises Singer’s argument in itself, as well as an earlier writer who discussed animal ethics, namely, Immanuel Kant. By looking at critics of Singer’s ideas, we can then discuss which view is more convincing. In order to understand how specicism may be similar to racism, it is first necessary to define specicism.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the Belief in Uniformity of Nature Hume begins section seven of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by expanding on his definitions he introduced in previous sections. In this section, on the idea of necessary connection,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Farm Riots

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One commonality among the riots was the manipulation of power. On one hand the riots could be morally justified because the rioters were being manipulate to abide by the radical changes. If they did not follow the change their only choice was to suffer. On, the other hand, one could argue that the rioters did not have the means to One important perspective to consider is “Animal Farm” by George Orwell. One commonality among the riots was the manipulation of power.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In that section, called “Of Miracles,” Hume explains that we almost never have a compelling reason to believe in miracles. Hume does this by explaining that what we know about miracles is derived from the testimony of others who claim to have experienced miracles. Since we did not experience a miracle ourselves, we should believe that the testimony of a miracle occurring is less reliable than our own experiences. According to Hume, one ought to proportion one’s belief to the evidence given. If there happens to be a case in which all of the evidence points to a certain conclusion, we can be almost certain that that conclusion is correct.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume Research Paper

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Others may draw attention to the concept of a unicorn. A majority of people will have not claimed to have ever witnessed an actual unicorn but nearly all of them will be able to come up with a mental representation of a unicorn in their minds. To this Hume rebuttals that while one may be able to come up with the idea of a unicorn without ever seeing one, this is only because the mind is capable of constructing new concepts from prior experience. By this he means while the majority of people will not claim to have seen a unicorn, those people who can come up with a mental representation of a unicron, have indeed seen both a horse and a horn and with assistance from the “creative power of the mind” (Hume EHU 2.5) can combine these to past experiences to construct a new concept in their mind, further justifying that even new concepts come from past experiences.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We must trust to nothing but facts: these are presented to us by nature and cannot deceive.” -Antoine Lavoisier. There are a lot of debates everyday about certain things, but there is one specific question that is discussed about all the time. People can never agree on this topic: Which is superior, reason or instinct? There are many situations where one of these things better than the other, but there are also times when neither of them are more important.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paper 2 In this paper, I will discuss Mary Anne Warren's "Speaking of Animal Rights" which discusses the strength animals have to rights. Warren’s paper is rebuttal to Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” I agree with Warren that humans' reason responsiveness makes human rights more important. I will explain her argument which focuses on humans' ability to listen to reason as morally relevant to the strength of their rights.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an attempt to make his case for these claims, Hume advances what we now call the justice argument. The basic idea is…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 2005 paper “Ethics and Intuitions,” Peter Singer seeks to find a new role for intuitions in moral theorizing in light of studies by Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Greene, which seem to cast doubt on the reliability of moral intuitions. These studies suggest that much of our moral reasoning is less based in rationalizing and more based in instinctual “gut” reactions, and that these instincts can be explained in terms of their evolutionary history. Further, Greene in particular demonstrates that these moral instincts can be manipulated in order to give contradicting reports, suggesting that moral intuitions are unreliable. Singer, noting how moral theorists have thus far been unable to give an account of morality without relying on moral intuitions,…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays