Essay On Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Improved Essays
Many scholars have established the reason behind why the death penalty should be abolished, (Elliott and Robinson. 1991) whether or not the influence of life imprisonment really deters murders from committing the crime again, or those who plan on coming the same crime. (Radelet and Borg. 2000.) the cost of the death, incapacitation caprice, and retribution is what surrounds the death penalty; this article illustrates the history behind it all. (McAdams. 1998.) the reason behind the idea that race holds a major place in the death penalty, the author addresses whether the problem with the death penalty is that it’s racially unfair. (De Boef, and Boydstun. 2009) this article address the effect, the aftermath, it aims to raise awareness …show more content…
(Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280) the court ruled that a mandatory death sentencing is unconstitutional, this case was also ruled as being disproportionate. It seems as though it wanted to promote and increase the number of executions. The act goes against religion, in many religions execution is an immoral act; this is another way that the death penalty is in violation of the constitution. The mentally ill is executed, in Atkins v. Virginia, Atkins was convicted of armed robbery, and capital murder. However due to his mental issues and being diagnosed with mental retardation, his case was affirmed and he was sentenced to life in prison instead. ("Atkins v. Virginia." Oyez. ) However, what must be looked at his how many cases that weren’t affirmed and dispirit the capital felons mental state they were put to death anyway.

In these articles the scholars make perfect sense as to why they death penalty is pointless. This punishment is simply inhumane and it contradicts everything this constitutions states. In many cases the eighth amendment becomes a major factor: cruel and unusual punishment. This ac is also in violation of the right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Some may call this act random, because
…show more content…
It is a wrong done to the victim, the defendant, the families, and the country; the United States must replace the death penalty as capital punishment with life without parole and hard labor. The death penalty does not change or reduce anything, it takes the life of innocent people, abuses the nation, and cost tax payers millions of dollars. The government must understand that there is no difference between illegal and legalized murder is murder, and this punishment should no longer be allowed. After several years of these inmates being on death row, the state decides the day he or she will take their last breath; but however said that dying was a bad thing? This is only another way for the system to have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although some believe that it violates the 8th amendment that forbids any cruel and unusual punishment, but the only crimes that are punishable by death are espionage, terrorism, treason, large scale drug trafficking, federal murder, or attempt to kill a witness, juror, or anyone affiliated with the trial. The 8th amendment was originally used to prevent judges from making bails based of biased decisions and opinions. It also prevented cruel and unusual punishment from being placed for crimes that aren 't as harsh as they might be punished for. Since it is not clear on what it means by “cruel and unusual,” the dismissal of the death penalty cannot be justified by the 8th Amendment without a more clear, concise definition. Some of the amendments might be a little out dated and aren 't put to use in modern times.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In reference to Atkins versus Georgia, The Supreme Court eventually ruled that by executing the mental challenge did violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Legal Information Institute, 2017). Simmons’s counsel argued that the Constitution forbids the execution of a juvenile who is under the age of 18 when a crime was committed. Simmons filed a new petition for a state post-conviction relief, arguing that Atkins’ established reasoning that the Constitution forbids the execution of a youth who was under the age of 18 when they committed a crime (FindLaw, 2017). Nine years later, the Missouri Supreme Court finally reviewed Simmons’ case in 2003 (Legal Information Institute, 2017). The Missouri Supreme Court acknowledged and reversed Simmons’ death sentence to life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole (FinbLaw, 2017).…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prior to reading his thoughts I would say that I probably sat on the fence in the middle, I wasn’t really for it nor was I against it. However, after really reading what Judge Marshall said about the topic, I do believe it is a violation of a person’s eighth amendment rights to cruel and unusual punishment. I feel that my decision goes further than the violation of the amendment. I also did a little extra research and found that it is more expensive to execute someone rather than have them serve a sentence of life without the…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (TS) The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution says: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” which forbids the federal government from executing overly severe penalties on criminal defendants as punishment for crime after conviction. (PS) However, capital punishment violates the Eighth Amendment because a death row inmate will suffer extreme pain from a lethal injection that it should be considered cruel and unusual. (SS) The use of lethal injection to execute a death row inmate is disturbing and inhumane as it causes “air hunger” and feelings of terror.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty violates the eight amendment, which applies to the fifty states as well. The term cruel and unusual punishment would be the reason of the violation. Beside the violation of rights the Death Penalty has not been proven to deter crime, victims of the Death Penalty are also found innocent in later years. The expenses for Death Row trials and inmates higher than other inmates, and the Death Penalty sentences are given to African American significantly higher than White Americans.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arguments against the death penalty can be simplified and classified into the categories of the brutality of the process, along with its morality, and the basic reason of why it is apart of the United States Judicial system. The argument in support of the death penalty has been prevalent throughout the decades and although the times have changed the reasons of why it is obligatory to the safety of this nation's citizens. When presented with the question concerning the necessity of the death penalty, an essay by Edward I. Koch titled "Death and Justice" comes to mind in support of capital punishment. Koch starts with two short examples of murderers who were on death row and executed in 1984.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Eighth Amendment(VIII) to the United States Constitution being the Bill of Right that prohibits unusual punishments and cruel, the debate whether death penalty constitute cruel and unusual punishment remains unsolved puzzle in the United States or in some States. As some states have mandatory death penalties in certain cases, the Supreme Court found these laws unconstitutional (Woodson v. North Carolina 1976) and they actually violates the Eighth Amendment (Furman v. Georgia 1972). However, using these examples I am not saying that Charles Laverne Singleton should have been freed because he killed someone.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the state and federal courts lasted for years, but they were rejected. In 2002, the Missouri Supreme Court stated they should reconsider Simmon’s case after looking at the previous court case of Atkins v Virginia, which stated executing the mentally ill constituted as cruel and unusual punishment. Using the reasoning from the atkins case, the Supreme Court ruled in Roper v. Simmons that the execution of an individual who is under 18 at the time they committed their crime violates the constitution’s eighth amendment against cruel and unusual punishment. At the time, many death penalty states had exempt juveniles from capital punishment, so the Court saw that as evidence for their decision. Although many people disagree with the ruling, “Studies…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Issues concerning the death penalty have been wrestled with in court as early as 1967. The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the ending of the lives of those thought to be guilty of a crime, mostly murder. The methods used include: lethal injections, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging. Only thirty-two states practice the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag, author of “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense,” argues for the use of the death penalty.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The taking of a person’s life inhibits a person from having a life, seeking liberty, and pursuing happiness and thus is going against the fundamentals America is founded upon. The death penalty is racist and expensive and…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, the legality of the death penalty was challenged in the landmark Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia in 1972. The Court declared that the death penalty in unconstitutional in, at least, certain applications because the punishment violates the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Justice Thurgood Marshall, who argued that the death penalty was unconstitutional in all instances, writes that there are six conceivable defenses given to justify capital punishment, which are “retribution, deterrence, prevention of repetitive criminal acts, encouragement of guilty pleas and confessions, eugenics and economy.” Since a person who is executed cannot possibly commit a future criminal act, that argument is invalid. Also, eugenic justification is roundly abhorred in the 21st century.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been argued over the years that capital punishment violates the eight amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America. It was argued that because the eighth amendment states that no cruel and unusual punishments should be inflicted upon anyone, so, capital punishment should not be used as a form of paying for a crime. What is not being taken under consideration, however, is the fact that the law has been morally and properly assessing these cases. How so? Well, lets begin by stating that the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 in the Gregg v. Georgia and Jurek v. Texas, that a death sentence did not violate the eighth amendment as the forms of execution have been reformed so that the punishments are not categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics