The answer to humanity longest debated question of purpose and existence is extremely controversial to some. Philosophers and Theologians have long discussed where humanity comes from and why humans exist. Many scientists believe it is random chance and because humanity has no purpose but to live. Theologians say each individual person were intelligently designed and made with a purpose to fulfill. Theologians base this idea off of one true creator and defend him using three complex and well thought of arguments.
The first of three major arguments For God are the Cosmological Arguments. These ideas pertain to how the universe and things in the universe function. The first is that everything in the universe is put into motion by something else. Nothing just randomly gets up and moves, something …show more content…
The moral argument states that every person has an already established idea of what is wrong and what is right. Highfield explains this concept by saying that “all human beings have a sense of right and wrong, make moral judgements, and have a sense of justice” (Highfield, 2008, pp. 92) meaning that every person has an idea of what is acceptable. Every person has an idea of what justice is and what is good and what is evil from nature. The moral argument uses this truth to say that there is no reason why a person born on one side of the earth should have the same sense of right and wrong as someone born on the other side of the earth other than God instilled it in both of them. The moral argument assumes that God is the only viable reason for each human’s consciousness. However, a point of opposition against the moral argument says that every human’s born knowledge of right and wrong is from evolution and the ideas are meant to insure the survival of the species. Opposition to the moral argument says that the idea of right and wrong is a result of trial and error in the process of survival of the
The first of three major arguments For God are the Cosmological Arguments. These ideas pertain to how the universe and things in the universe function. The first is that everything in the universe is put into motion by something else. Nothing just randomly gets up and moves, something …show more content…
The moral argument states that every person has an already established idea of what is wrong and what is right. Highfield explains this concept by saying that “all human beings have a sense of right and wrong, make moral judgements, and have a sense of justice” (Highfield, 2008, pp. 92) meaning that every person has an idea of what is acceptable. Every person has an idea of what justice is and what is good and what is evil from nature. The moral argument uses this truth to say that there is no reason why a person born on one side of the earth should have the same sense of right and wrong as someone born on the other side of the earth other than God instilled it in both of them. The moral argument assumes that God is the only viable reason for each human’s consciousness. However, a point of opposition against the moral argument says that every human’s born knowledge of right and wrong is from evolution and the ideas are meant to insure the survival of the species. Opposition to the moral argument says that the idea of right and wrong is a result of trial and error in the process of survival of the