Question Of Evil

Improved Essays
The Question of Evil
The problem of evil stems from the idea that since there are vast amounts of evil in the world, God cannot exist. Critics argue that this is the case because if He did exist, we would not find evils in our world. This objection is formulated into the Argument from Evil, which proceeds as follows:
P1: If God exists, then He is omnipotent and morally perfect.
P2: If God is omnipotent, then He would be able to prevent all of the evil and suffering in the world.
P3: If God is morally perfect, then he would want to prevent all of the evil and suffering in the world.
P4: We still find vast amounts of evil and suffering in the world.
C1: Therefore, God is not benevolent and morally perfect.
C2: Therefore, God doesn’t exist.
…show more content…
This means that the amount of good in the world exceeds the amount of evil and the scale will be tipped in the favor of good, rather than evil. Therefore, the net value of the world would be inherently good. Moreover, the addition of evil into our world actually maximizes the amount of good we see in our world and results in a higher net good. If we lived in a world with no evil, we would have a low level of “good” as humans would be living very mundane lives. However, with the introduction of evil, the amount of good jumps up exponentially and the net outcome of good is higher than it previously was. This is seen in BC Johnson’s argument with the dying baby (148). A baby dies in a natural fire. At first this seems like a horrendous evil that is hard to fathom. However, through this evil, we are still able to maximize the amount of good prevalent in the world. Johnson’s example argues that this initial fire and death causes a sense of urgency in the community (148). This initial evil would cause the fire department to become more efficient, builders to construct more fire-preventing utilities in houses, etc. and overall increase society 's response to fires. Therefore, in the end, more people will survive by learning from this calamity and the net benefit of the initial evil will still be good because the overall “level of good” has

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    An Australian philosopher named John L. Mackie is widely known for his argument against the problem of evil. Mackie’s argument was very similar to the problem of evil. The problem of evil in summary states that a God cannot exist with the existence of evil, but Mackie’s argument was not that God did not exist entirely, but rather that God did not exist as an all-powerful or perfect God. He argued that having an all knowing God, and the present existence of evil were both logically inconsistent. Mackie thought that if you could say one of those statements was false, then you could still believe in God’s existence.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you hear the word evil what thoughts pop-in your head? Do you believe an evil can exist if there’s still a higher power or God? In this essay, I will be discussing Williams Rowe’s argument for atheism based on the Well-Known argument “The Problem of evil and Some Varieties of Atheism”. The problem of evil questions the existence of a God based on the evil in the world. In this paper, I will discuss his reasoning for atheism, I will explain in depth what he means by each premise.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The essay regarding evil and its relation to free will entitled “The Argument from Evil” by Peter Van Inwagen proposes many questions and contradictions. All of which relate back to one principle idea—the problem of evil and how to solve it. At the end of his compilation of ideas, propositions and examples, Van Inwagen poses a slew of questions for his readers to ponder and attempt to answer. Peter Van Inwagen is adamant upon insisting that there both is and is not a God. He proposes this as he explains the problem of evil.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of time, many evil things have occurred on this earth; however, many good things have also happened. Does the good done outweigh the evil? It is hard to say. There have been a lot of extreme evils in our past, such as: slavery, the holocaust, and the Catholic Church is not void of evil, as is the case of The Crusades. The list is incessant.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Leibniz Vs Mackie

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem of evil arises in both of the philosophical arguments by Gottfried Leibniz and J. L. Mackie, as they attempt to argue for and against the existence of God. The title of Leibniz’s book, Theodicy, translates into “the vindication of God’s power and goodness despite the existence of evil,” and so Leibniz attempts to solve the problem of evil through his work (Martin 313). Mackie’s work, Evil and Omnipotence, sets forth a strong thesis in his argument challenging religious belief in God. Despite the problem of evil in the world, it is still rational to believe in the existence of God.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Good versus evil is a theme strung throughout literary works, movies, and television shows. There’s of course the trope of the angel on one shoulder, the devil on the other, or the recurring plot of the good guys verses the bad guys. In short, good versus evil is a binary you can’t help but be aware of, so it’s no wonder we place good and evil as opposites. In one sense, the objection that good cannot exist without evil plays on the semantic relationship between good and evil.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil has been a consistent argument coming from both theists and atheists for ages. In this paper the argument will be examined from both sides, the article A Simpler Free Will Defense” will be summarized, and I will analyze the article and additionally explain why my side of the argument is correct. The question that stands is “if there is a God how does he let evil occur?” Is it that this God cannot prevent the evil, which goes against the typical theist view that God is omnipotent, or will he not prevent evil, which goes against the concept of an omnibenevolent God. In an excerpt from The Philosophers Way John Hick talks about how evil can be allowed while still having an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent God…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    St. Anslem, was a priest during the 11th century he was the first person known to have formed the Ontological argument as we know it; which can be found in the second chapter of his work, The Proslogion. The Ontological argument is not an argument designed to convert the atheist, but to reassure those who have faith or some belief in God, it was meant for the believer seeking understanding, in other words some logic behind their belief. Since only the “fool” knows but does not believe (Psalms 14:1, 53:1). The word, ‘Ontological’ comes from the prefix ‘ontology’ meaning ‘metaphysical science or study of being’. The argument is not a posteriori argument, thus not being based off experience or observations like The Teleological argument produced…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Third Meditation, Descartes provides an argument for the existence of God that has been a great source of discussion and debate since. With the Meditations, Descartes attempted to deconstruct and destroy all of his beliefs and all foundations of knowledge in order to accomplish two aims: to provide a sound basis for scientific method and to prove the compatibility between science and religion. With the Meditations, Descartes was determined to figure out what he knew with certainty and did this by using doubt as a method. Anything that could be doubted he deemed untrustworthy and ultimately realized the only thing he could know is that he existed as it would be impossible to even doubt one’s existence without existing in the first place.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first idea we face, is the logical problem of evil. What this questions is the possibility of there being an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omnipresent God and why evil still exists. One of the arguments made is, there is a God who is omnibenevolent and supposedly all good eliminates evil as far as it can, but we still have evil existing when there’s a God. By stating all of these, we have to give up one of the statements in order to make the argument true. The one fact that we can more than likely give up, is all good eliminates evil as far as it can.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil has always existed, yet throughout history, the problem of evil has represented the most serious objection to the Christian faith. However, Jesus’ affliction and suffering that was implemented upon his body provided the Christians with assurance that weeping may endure for a night, but joy comes in the morning or that evil will never cause his authority to be compromise. In addition, Secular Humanism does exist, and as long as there is a human race, someone or something will try to abort the character and the existence of a superior God. God has given man the ability to think and to rationalize, but in return, in most cases have caused man to think that they are on the same level of God or far greater than his ability. Above…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Their argument is that if God really did exist (and he was a good/omnipotent God), then evil would not exist because he would not allow it to. These people are looking for answers as to why the cruelty and evil from events such the Crusades or the Holocaust were allowed to happen. Their argument comes from a place of compassion and justice for the victims of evil and cruelty (which eventually is all of us). This is a fair question that I believe deserves an answer.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since we can remember, our existence as humans has been governed by two main ideologies. Good and bad. We base our entire lives around these concepts with no real proof of what they are besides what we we are taught. We are told that someone who hates someone else is a bad person, but given no evidence to support these claims. Why is someone bad?…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics