The Queen V. Dudley And Stephens: Case Study

Improved Essays
n the case of “The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens” the purpose of the punishment given was in my belief a general deterrence. Simply meaning, that the punishment given to Thomas Dudley and Edwin Stephens may be seen by others and shows an association between the punishment and offense that may deter other individuals from committing the same offense even when the likelihood of the being caught is not known (Brody & Acker, 2015). Furthermore, it was mitigating circumstances that precipitated the murder of Richard Parker while lost at sea. Otherwise, no information was given to suggest that Thomas Dudley, Edwin Stephens, nor Brooks were criminals prior to this offense. Therefore,I do not believe that the deadly trio was a danger to society.

While

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polarising the nation, The Queen v Baden-Clay case demonstrates the extent to which the Australian media can adversely affect the success of legal proceedings. The Australian adversarial system enforces strict rules of procedure, which are imperative to achieve equality and adequate protection in society. Although it is deemed effective, imperfections are evident (Skwirk Online Education, Nd). The Gerald Baden-Clay case highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal justice system through the efficiency of the standard of evidence, rights of the accused, precedent and appeal used within the relentless trial to prove an accused murderer guilty.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 2: In Commonwealth v. Aves and Sim’s case 7 Cushy, chief justice Shaw came to two entirely different verdicts, which lead to massive controversy and questioning about his inconsistency on slavery issues. In Commonwealth v. Aves, Chief Justice Shaw made the decision to grant a 6-year-old girl named Med freedom after her “owner” voluntarily brought her into a free state (where slavery was abolished). A key term within this statement is that she was voluntarily brought into the free state; she did not escape from her masters. At this time, slaves were considered property of their owners, which technically means that comity, should be exercised.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles was born in Ghent, Belgium on February 24, 1500 who was the child of Philip of Burgundy and Joanna of Spain. The Emperor Charles V made a last attempt to restore the medieval all-inclusive realm. His opponents were in this way the European national states; particularly France; the German rulers; the Turks; additionally the Pope. He controlled the Netherlands, Bohemia, Hungary, Naples, Sicily and Sardinia. Administering Spain implied controlling Spanish America and in Charles' chance Cortés took Mexico and Pizarro overpowered Peru.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2) Justice Shaw concluded two different rulings in his 1836 and 1851 cases regarding two similar “fugitive slave” scenarios. In the Commonwealth v. Aves case, Justice Shaw ruled that the “fugitive slave” was to remain in Massachusetts and therefore, become a freed slave. Justice Shaw ruled the opposite in 1851 and ordered Thomas Sims be returned to Georgia after he had escaped. Justice Shaw cited two different laws in his opposite decisions. In the case of Commonwealth v. Aves (1836), Justice Shaw cited the lack of the law of comity as justification for keeping Med, the fugitive slave, in Massachusetts and therefor not returning her to her slave masters in the south.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This will ensure a dangerous multiple killer, never has a chance to kill again outside of gaol and serves as an example to others who may consider committing a similar offence. This sentence may also serve as some reassurance to remaining family victims and the general community that this crime is considered abhorrent by the state and that justice has been served. The R v. Gonzales case is a lucid example of the legal system effectively balancing the rights of the individual and the society as evidently justice, equity and fairness have been…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cases that can relate to the doctrine of fairness is Cardinal and Oswald v. Director of Kent Institution. This case was involved inmates in Matsqui Institution. In Cardinal and Oswald v. Director of Kent Institution (1985), the appellants were prisoners who reportedly participated in a hostage-taking incident of one of the guards. After the incident, the director made an oral order to remove the inmates from the general prison population and put into segregation. The director was given a recommendation by The Segregation Review Board to release the inmates back into the general prison with the rest of the inmates, before any major issue arises within that population.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I thought I was firm on my views on capital punishment until we recently covered the topic in class. When asked to write down my original thoughts on capital punishment, I wrote: I am against the death penalty. I’m against it partly because of my religious upbringing, that condones capital punishment, and partly because I think there’s a possibility someone can be executed when innocent. I don’t really know what the death penalty is about today.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Professor Ashworth proposes an ideal solution to the discrepancy of conduct under murder, and the often disproportionate sentence that accompanies it. He argues that the judge should have the same discretion to impose lesser sentences as he has for other crimes , because the current inflexibility of the murder sentence results in disproportionate sentencing and thus labelling. However, the objective of accurate classification is entirely within the public interest because offence labelling performs a function of social reinforcement , therefore the current law does not suffice for the needs of society. The scale of D’s mens rea is not currently taken into full consideration – it is merely a requirement that must be satisfied for culpability, regardless of its extent – therefore this societal desire cannot be fully achieved under the strict ‘two-category’ scheme of labelling.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As John Morrison exclaimed,“It should be clear that the death penalty does just the opposite of promoting decency and respect for life... It can never be applied fairly.” Since the mid nineteenth century, inmates on death row have been murdered by a plethora of gruesome methods, such as venomous lethal injections, gas chambers, and electrocution. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 1,413 executions in the United States from 1976 to the present. Although the number of death penalty verdicts are decreasing, flaws in the American judicial system have caused an increase in the amount of punishing wrongfully accused suspects to the death penalty.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When is cannibalism okay? Is it ever okay? In a utilitarian society killing and cannibalism could be just under the right circumstances. A utilitarian society believes that benefit is a way to describe law; the greater population’s pleasure over pain is the way to tell if something is just. Jeremy Bentham explains the principles of utilitarianism in his works Principles of Morals and Legislation.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justified Murder Essay

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justifiable Murder n after by sentencing over 72,000 to death in his reign. ()By the 1700’s English established that over 200 different crimes that would seem nearly insignificant today were punishable by death. For example, execution was a reasonable punishment for cutting down a neighbor 's tree. ( ) In the days of monarchy few doubted the morality of executions. Most believed that king had the divine right to do so from God himself.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays