The Purple Shirt Analysis

Improved Essays
As the Minister of Justice, it is important to remember that justice is served to the right people and in this case it is the people who have been threatened by The Purple Shirts and have lost someone due to their absurd rules. There is a strong amount of people who want to punish these Grudge Informers thus, it is important that we provide them justice through law. By using the court and laws as means to accomplish their murderous intentions, the Grudge Informers’ actions were certainly cruel and inhumane. Out of all five perspectives that were presented by the deputies, I agree with deputy 3 as he offers solutions that are most reasonable for the Purple Shirts dispute. Grudge Informers’ are citizens of the state, who report others for unimportant …show more content…
Hoarding more than the permitted amount of dried eggs, listening to a foreign radio broadcast, and associating with known hooligans are actions that could possibly get you killed. These laws, are unreasonable and in no way helped better the society therefore the laws that were enacted by the Purple Shirt party were taken advantage by citizens, in order to kill the their enemies. There has been a large amount of innocent lives that were taken away because of the Grudge Informers therefore letting Grudge Informers get away with seems to be immoral. People who feel that they can get away with murder once, may feel that they can do it again hence it is important to punish these people through the law in a civilized way. If we were to proclaim everything that happened under the Purple Shirts to be without legal basis, it would invite an unbearable chaos, as majority of the population wants the Grudge Informers to be punished. When the Purple Shirts were in charge and their rules were enact, people responded to these laws by not only getting rid of those they accused but with desire to ingratiate with the part, raised against them or through absolute officiousness. It is simply not safe to live in a society full of people who have had the intentions and ability to murder another thus they should be punished. While the Purple Shirts have been in control, …show more content…
Deputy 1and 2 seem well placed in their reason but misplaced in the wish of the population to seek justice. They offer a no action plan hence offers absolutely no resolution for the people. Deputy 2 comes forth with the argument that the Grudge Informers should not be prosecuted because they were acting lawful. Although the Grudge Informers were acting lawful, the laws that some Grudge Informers used to essentially kill another person were laws that did not benefit the society in any way. The laws created by the Purple Shirts which resulted in death, if not followed were hoarding more than the permitted amount of dried, failing to provide identification papers within 5 days and listening to foreign radio broadcasts. The following rules did not benefit the society, thus the only reason that seems to be logical for its use was for the citizens in order to kill their enemies. Therefore, even though they were acting lawful, the law that was created was immoral and had no significance to the society. Another point that is brought upon by Deputy 2 is the fact that it is unfair to deprive a defendant on the terms of laws that were not given reasonable notice of liability. What is also unfair in this situation is taking away another’s life for selfish reasons. Instead of looking at this case based on what was legal at that particular time, they should focus more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Simone Ggbo Case Study

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The major objective of this essay is to select a case from the International Criminal Court and to describe the circumstances of the case, the parties involved, the alleged crimes, the evidence presented by both prosecution and defense, and the current disposition of the case. The case that I have selected to write about is the case of The Prosecutor VS Simone Gbagbo. The parties involved in this case are Simone Gbargo, her husband President Gbagbo, the citizens of Ivory Coast which is located in west Africa , and finally the International criminal court. In the case of the Prosecutor VS Simone Gbagbo, the defendant is accused of violating the Roman statue and violating crimes against humanities which include murder, rape and sexual…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “U.S. Seeks Decades in Prison for Ex- Rikers Guard in Fatal Beating of Ailing Inmate” by Benjamin Weiser - informs the reader about The U.S trying to sentence Mr. Coll a ex-riker guard The author explains that a guard killed an inmate in a correctional facility. The guard kicked the inmate repeatedly in the head. In addition Mr. Coal lifted Mr. Spears head and said “ remember who did this”.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milton Lantigua was falsely convicted after he supposedly fatally shot a man on streets of the Bronx in 1990. Approximately five years after his sentence, the criminal justice system reversed his conviction stating that the prosecution allowed a main witness in the trial to perjure herself and failed to reveal the presence of a second witness that might have helped the defense. The state of New York paid Lantigua $300,000 to settle but the prosecutors received no punishment. Mr. Lantigua is just one individual who is wrongfully convicted due to misconduct or error in the prosecution. According to District Attorney Robert Johnson, the cases in which the prosecutors erred, the prosecutors were given little disciple, in fact, some continually received merit raises and gained higher positions.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the revolutionaries didn’t kill suspected people than they would have never been successful with their revolution in the first place. Finally, you look down at the traitor who you have just killed. His eyes are still open. You look into his lifeless eyes and think “You deserved this. We are doing this for the safety of…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws take the same place that rules take for a public structure. They are in effect to establish rules of conduct, provide a system of enforcement, protect rights and freedoms, protect society from harm, and to resolve disputes. They help control scenarios that cannot be controlled easily by police officers. Everywhere around the world, police officers are getting sent to trial and possibly life sentence in prison for failure to act within their job description. In this case, Constable James Forcillo; a former member of the Toronto Police Department has been charged with attempted murder for an incident that occurred on July 27th, 2013.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elvis Rodriguez Fall 2015 Civil Liberties Final Freedom is a condition in which people have the “opportunity” to speak act and try to pursue happiness without any unnecessary restrictions. Freedom is important because it leads to expressions of original thought, increased creativity and a high quality of life. The idea of freedom is complex and it’s not so easy to understand. In the United States “essential” freedom are “guaranteed” by the Bill of Rights, a part of the constitution.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Sexual Awakening & Performance of Excess in The Color Purple” As preached by the church ladies at The Color Purple, we better lock up all our men and young boys, too because there’s a new Shug Avery in town. Directed by John Doyle, the revival transplanted itself from a successful run at London’s The Menier Chocolate Factory to open on Broadway’s Bernard B. Jacobs Theater on Dec 10. The Broadway revival brought Cynthia Erivo to reprise her role as Celie and the Oscar and Grammy winner Jennifer Hudson as Shug Avery on her quest for EGOT.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the town of Niort, a government official contacted the National Convention, writing that “the crowd is continuing to gather” even though there were “three thousand national guardsmen in the region to establish order” (Doc D). This was the case in much of France - people gathered to protest the violent actions made by the government. However, in the Declaration of the Rights of Man, it states that the aim of the government is to protect a citizen’s natural rights. Among these rights is “resistance to oppression” (Doc A). As the government continued to kill innocent people, terror grew among the citizens of France.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I believe that it is the state’s responsibility to maintain a safe environment for all of the people living in it; thus, I believe that punishment is the responsibility of the state, and should not be contracted out. In fact, it is stated in the book, that through instrumental justification, the state is the most appropriate agent to inflict criminal sanctions because of its fair and impartial position” (p. 294). Private prisons, according to the text, “are a contradiction of sorts for the criminal justice system” (p. 129). Private prisons are “operated and maintained by a privately owned correctional firm;” thus, are scrutinized for many reasons. Partial scrutinizing transpires because the punishments are weak and partially because…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the criminal justice should treat everyone equal despite their morality beliefs. Even though the crimes may look like they were committed for the greater good, it doesn 't stop from being a crime. Taking an innocent life will never be good. A good act should be helping people, not killing them. Killing people should never be counted as a “compassion” act, it should never have a lenient law.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Destiny Bush Essay “A caning in Singapore stirs up a fierce debate about crime and punishment” (Reyes 181). Both texts “Rough Justice” by Alejandro Reyes and “Time to Assert American Values” by New York Times, have their own point of views with handling the Michael Fay situation. “Rough Justice” is for harsh punishments if laws are broken. “Time to Assert American Values” is going against tough punishments such as caning or death. After carefully analyzing the two text, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has the most relevant and sufficient article to support it because of the way the author uses logical reasoning and evidence.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether or not Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti received a fair trial is still in dispute today. Many people during the time of the case believed that the men were “executed on murder based on doubtful ballistic evidence” because of the hostility towards immigrants due to the Red Scare and World War 1 (“Perfect Suspects, Unfair Trials”). The evidence provided during the trial showed that the men were found guilty due to the fact that they were in anarchist groups and were active members of multiple militant groups. Sacco and Vanzetti were victims of intense xenophobia because of being Italian immigrants. This gave the courts the ability to declare a verdict on their ethnicity; therefore, we now have laws to protect the defendant from an unfair trial.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hart-Fuller debate published in the Harvard Law Review was a first attack to Fuller’s theories by Professor Hart, an influential positivist at the time. He brought up the case of Apartheid as mentioned above and also the problem of the Nazi Regime, contending that both of the legal system contains valid laws on a positivist view. Fuller rejects this argument by saying they were using law as an “instrument of an arbitrary and tyrannical dictatorship” and such laws should be considered invalid. These views are then shown further when Hart discussed on the dilemma of “The Grudge Informer” proposed by Fuller. The Grudge Informer tells a fictitious story of a state newly overturned from an unethical regime, one that bears resemblance with the…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lon L. Fuller’s purpose in “The Problem of The Grudge Informer” is to show his readers the various relations between the nature of law and morality. In his article, he tells his readers to hypothetically imagine that they have been elected Minister of Justice for their country. He makes his readers imagine a perfect country that then has been ruined by a political party or society that called themselves the Purple Shirts. The way they were elected was by giving false promises and by intimidation. They had no interest in abolishing the constitution, Civil and Criminal Codes, and the Code of Procedures.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics