Should Death Penalty Be Allowed

Decent Essays
The death penalty shouldn’t be allowed in the United States because it costs too much to execute them rather than putting them in prison. The amount of times they have executed the wrong person makes a big error in our system.
It costs too much to execute people instead of putting them in prison. Putting someone on death row costs more than $1 million because they have to hire expensive lawyers to deal with their cases since they’re so complicated. If they hired a cheap lawyer they would end up on death row a majority of the cases. They also have to take DNA tests before they’re put on death row and they often do testing on the inmates.
Having someone in jail for a life long sentence costs about $47,102 per year in California. That provides $19,663 for security for the inmate, $12,442 for health care, $7,214 for maintenance, $3,493 for administration, $2,562 to be fed,
…show more content…
They kill people for a murder they did, but not always being 100 percent on who the killer is, is scary. Killing innocent people based on what other people saw and not taking DNA tests immediately is what 's getting people executed. It costs too much to put someone in death row because they just sit there for usually 20 years until they’re either executed or until they’ve died from natural causes. They should be putting people in prison instead. They’ll save billions of dollars if they decide to take away death row. Putting someone on death row costs taxpayers the same as if sending someone to a private college. Death penalty trials are 20 times more expensive than trials for a sentence of life in prison without parole. There have been about 1,394 people who have been executed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In 1989 a man in Texas was punished with the death penalty because the jury confused him for another man with the same name, height, and looks, this was was innocent. In 1944 a 14 year old African-American girl was executed with little evidence from her two hour

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Death Penalty The death penalty how much does society really knows or understand about the process? Many people view the death penalty a justice “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth ( mathew5:38).” The victim’s family might feel that the criminal is to be punished to the highest degree for his crime. Most people feel that is justice. However, most people do not really know much about the process of executing a death row inmate, how much more the death penalty cost comparing with keeping an inmate in prison for life without parole. The death penalty is unethical and waste of millions of dollars, because the death penalty is a very slow process, and waste of taxpayers’ money.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Opponents also say that the death penalty is used unfairly. That poor people are more likely to be put to death because they cannot afford the high-powered defense that a wealthy person can buy. O. J. Simpson for example, many believe that he did kill his ex-wife, but since he had so much money he easily was able to pay for a good lawyer to get him out of his crime. Another issue that those against the Death Penalty have to say is that, “juveniles ' brains are not yet fully developed and juveniles are less mature than adults, [and that] they should not be punished as adults.” (Juvenile Death Penalty). Age should not be a factor…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, one thousand four hundred eighteen inmates have fallen victim to the death penalty. There is no telling how many of those thousands of inmates were innocent, because once the prisoner has passed away the court will rarely take cases to prove their innocence. Rather, the court system takes the cases of current death row inmates in an attempt to save his or her life (Death Penalty Information Center). In some cases there are very strong evidence that the court system was wrong and the executed prisoner was more than likely innocent. For example, Gary Graham, seventeen at the time, was convicted with robbing and shooting a man outside a supermarket in 1981.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mike was arrested and sentenced to death on circumstantial evidence, because the jury knew it was him. He was executed last year after 45 years on death row fighting his innocence. Shortly after, DNA evidence exonerated him and proved him not guilty. The death penalty (except in cases of heinous crimes) does more harm than good. Many people have strong feelings about capital punishment without having statistics and facts to back up their stance.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Society must have a punishment for those that cause brutal murders, and this punishment needs to have the ultimate penalty of death. Isaac Ehrlich in 1973 did a study proving that “For every inmate that was executed, 7 lives were spared due to others being deterred from the nervousness of being put on death row.” Further studies have been done and proved the same facts. The only problem with death row is the fact that it takes several years to execute the prisoner. States with very high crime rates and high murder rates, would most likely double if the death penalty were to be withdrawn. A dangerous person that lives off the factor of killing, does not care if they go to jail.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By some estimates, seeking death adds at least $1 million to the cost of a murder trial, and some death penalty cases cost 20 times as much as the average life-without-parole prosecution.” Many people would agree that it isn’t worth the money to seek the death penalty and instead just pay for the person to stay in prison for the rest of their life. However, others like Don Hambidge say that, “ Safety is better than convenience.” If the person going to prison is going there for life, and not having any chance of seeing the outside world again, and convicted of killing someone else, what would stop them from not killing or hurting someone else in…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They will bring up the fact that it cost twice as much a year to kill a person then it does to keep them on life without parole, but most of that cost is for security because the people people being housed on death row are murderers so it going to take more man power to make sure they don’t try anything. The second part of their argument involves a sum total of the cost of killing someone usually over a million dollars which looks like big scary number compared to $47,421 a year, but that because they include the cost of the original trail, appeals, lawyer costs, and other court cost, all added on top of the original cost of keeping them in jail. When people talk about the cost of keeping them in jail forever they never include that those people are doing the exact same thing. Also even though it cost a million dollars to kill someone it cost a lot more to put them in jail for life in California it cost $47,421 a year per person over then course of 50 years that comes to 2,371,050 a person on top of their legal fees. The death penalty does costs a lot and that’s a problem, but abolishing the death penalty isn’t the answer to the cost because then we’re just paying more over a longer period, the answer is showing people that it’s more expensive to keep them…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Believe it or not, “per person, the death penalty is probably one of the most expensive state programs, and it produces no measurable gain in public safety. While states were spending millions of dollars on a single capital case, the average police budget had to be cut by 7 percent this year” ( qtd. in Jost 980). The United States is having economic problems at the moment, and would it not be smarter to save that amount of money? So much money is spent on these cases in the name of justice, even though they would get punishment enough by being imprisoned for life.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Electric chairs have been used for many years, thousands of times for death row prisoners. So in conclusion, I believe that the death penalty is wrong morally. No one should be strapped down and should face death by themselves, maybe see their loved ones a few hours prior if they have not committed the biggest crime of all. Taxpayers are essentially paying for someone 's death, we are funding the injection that is placed in their veins. If someone committed this awful crime they should live out their days miserable, stuck in a cell rioting, death is too…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This puts the lives of innocent people in danger. According to the Death Penalty Information Center”as of December 31, 2013, 2979 people are still waiting for execution in the death row; 392 were commuted; 3194 people 's death sentence was overthrown., 152 people were convicted of the death penalty..” For example on 1985, Earl Washington Jr. admitted that he had murdered a 19-year-old young mother and was sentenced to death. But Washington 's IQ was only 69. When he was questioned at the police station, his answer was clearly incompatible with the crime. Just a few days before the execution of the death penalty; the lawyers were given an opportunity to suspend execution on suspicion of the case.…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics