After Wood is forced to introduce some important aspects of Kantian constructivist that result from the model of standard, he strongly rejects this method and believes it is completely misunderstood not only Kant’s aims in presenting his foundation of morality, but it is even mistakenly doing wrong when it represents a Kant’s very conception of what a principle of morality is, how it is to be employed, and what it is supposed to accomplish. Wood adds it might be correct in some points, as Rawls reported, that Kant can be described as a constructivist in the philosophy of mathematics and some part of physics, but he is never held to be read as a constructivist in ethics and moral philosophy. The doubt about this model leads Wood to criticize
