Wildlife Crime Research Paper

Improved Essays
Wildlife crime is a particular group of crime. It does not fit "clean" into the different traditional groups, or labeling, often used to describe crimes. groups such as those against people or property crimes. wildlife crimes are sometimes thought about/believed to be victimless because an (able to be seen or picked out) hurt party or victim, at least in the form of a human being, is not present or filing a complaint. However, it has been argued that in the case of wildlife crime, like other victimless crime, (community of people/all good people in the world) is the true victim because these criminal acts lead to harm to, if not the complete destruction of, whole species of animals and plants, by that/in that way affecting hunters, nature (people …show more content…
A common, although very general, definition of wildlife crime states that it is any violation of a criminal law (clearly/for a single purpose) designed to protect wildlife. One of the most common wildlife crimes is illegally killing, which is generally defined as taking a wild useful thing/valuable supply out of season or through an illegal means. The laws usually cover animals (including (milk-producing animals), reptiles, birds, (frogs, toads, etc.), fish, and even insects), as well as certain plants . Although (boiling/killing/taking from somewhere else) often results in the death of an animal, it also includes illegal live trapping of animals that are later sold or traded for (money made/good thing received). illegally killing is not simply hunting out of season or with the wrong type of weapon; it can also be the killing or trapping of (in danger of disappearing forever), rare, or protected species. Wildlife crimes also include activities that affect wildlife more indirectly, such as pollution of (rivers, streams, etc.) that results in damage to fish or other wildlife, or the destruction of protected wildlife (homes/places where things …show more content…
Such laws allowed the rulers/rich and powerful people to preserve game animals and fish on their property by prohibiting others from hunting and fishing there without permission . While game wardens were selected/hired in some Americans in the 1700s, fishing and game hunting were not well controlled in the United States until the late 1800s, when state governments began to create F&W protection and (protecting something from harm) (services businesses/government units). Before the late 19th century, lawmakers in the United States did not make it a priority to place controls over hunting and fishing because wildlife useful things/valuable supplies were plenty across populated land. However, as the people increased and more land was developed or farmed, wildlife useful things/valuable supplies began to (lower in number/get worse). Also, conflict developed as people would often hunt or fish on property that was owned by other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why Trophy hunting can be good for animal conservation efforts This is an interesting argument and most people, (me included) find it hard to accept. I don’t like trophy hunting I cannot see why anyone would enjoy paying a large sum of money to kill an animal that has done nothing to deserve death. Frankly, the argument is counterintuitive. How can killing animals save animals from being killed? Keep an open mind.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The same applies for all the other methods. Therefore, despite the futile efforts by mammalogists to justify their inhuman nature depicted in the killing of animals, the question still remains to be answered regarding the killing of animals. Other researchers have articulated that killing of animals, especially wild animals, could be beneficial. This is because the act helps in reducing the damages on the environment that is caused by these animals, increase in wildlife value, and increased willingness for landowners to tolerate damages by wild animals and removing animals from the general populations before they die (Conover, 529). However, these advantages are hard to quantify or rather measure especially when comparing the act with the suggested benefit.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Predator control programs have killed hundreds of native animal species in hopes to benefit livestock producers and to enhance game populations. However, the animals they are killing, beavers, wolves, and many other carnivores, are important benefactors of ecosystems. Bradley Bergstrom said in his article “License to Kill” that “leading ecologists have concluded that many of the world’s pandemics, irruptions of undesirable species and collapses of desirable ones, and destabilization of ecosystems…have been caused by the loss of apex predators” (et al. 131). The loss of major apex predators is due to predator control, which once started creates a malicious cycle of deterioration in the ecosystem that is hard to reverse.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ninety nine percent of currently threatened species are at risk due to human activities such as hunting and taking animal body parts. Hunting can be in many forms, such as shooting and trapping. Trapping is when endangered animal are taken into captivity; it is illegal and can lead to their extinction. Trapping is very popular and is used to hunt beavers, coyotes, muskrats, and even fox. These innocent animals are trying to thrive for survival and trapping to kill them for their fur is making their population go down ("Connect.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Hunting

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Importance of Hunting The majority of our society does not understand the importance of the act of hunting. Hunting keeps the wildlife population at equilibrium between their natural lifestyle and our civilization to aid agricultural farmers. The problem is those who oppose hunting do not think it is ethical, and those who hunt more for fun rather than putting food on the table for their families. The truth of the matter is that hunting is a major part of protecting wildlife from overpopulation, disease, and overgrazing farm land. Though that’s not all, a species could starve to death if the population is not at a steady level.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, killing animal for sport is not acceptable. Why can human kill animals for fun or hobby on the suffering of animals? It is an act of cruelty. For instance, many hunters have so much fun to kill the wildlife by using powerful weapons and always take a photograph with the pitiful body such as elephant, tiger, or lion. Mitra explains that “Hunters kill the poor animals, not for food or anything else but for selling them as trophies” (2012).…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common Pool Resources

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many animal species that are in danger of being extinct. Often times their natural habitats are destroyed by deforestation, which eventually leads to declining population rates of certain animal species. However, many animal species are endangered due to poaching and other wildlife crimes. Many wildlife crimes that happen around the world are considered ‘open access’ crimes. Unless an animal is considered personal property of an individual or institution, the animal is considered an open-access common pool resource.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The title of McPhersons work is ‘Why I am a Vegan’ which relates the majority of the work to why killing animals and using their products is wrong. That being said, I would assume almost anyone would find it troubling if someone thought it was ok to kill other humans; this is because humans have rights that animals do not. We have a duty to animals to treat them justly and humanly but they don’t have rights equivalent to ours. McPherson relates his examples to humans so we would be able to relate to the examples and be able to have perspective, however it doesn’t work in this argument. McPherson states that “killing typically interferes dramatically with the victim’s autonomy” yes this is true for humans and it is also true for animals (McPherson 5).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why people see more animals roaming around in town, they are searching for food and water because they no longer have what they need. Hunters help keep this from happening. By harvesting wild animals, such as deer, they help keep that population controlled and keep them off the streets also keeping them from suffering from a lack of food and water. Hunters are not the ones choosing to build on the wild animals natural land, so why take it out on them? Hunters want there to be more land; more land means more animals, and more food sources for the animals to be strong and healthy.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you think about it, property damage is already illegal as well as trespassing and threats of violence. If this is the case, this law really serves no purpose. However, that's when you get to the broadness of the law. Under this law, it is technically legal to prosecute someone because of damage they have conducted to your brand via animal activism and even prosecute people for actions they didn't take part of as long as they can show a "connection" that would fall under the conspiracy charge of the law. The fact that filming agricultural abuse toward animals and sharing the video with others makes the person filming the abuse a criminal and not those conducting the abuse or the companies sanctioning the abuse shows the laws extreme irony and corporate influence.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays