War Over Religion Analysis

Great Essays
Wars are a part of Human nature. Humans have been going to war since before recorded history. The first ever recorded in history “took place in Mesopotamia in 2700 BCE between Sumer and Elam” (Mark), and even in these times it was fought for the same reasons as they are now. Greed, power, beliefs, and religion. No matter when in time there will always be someone who dislikes a single or group of people because their life is different from theirs, and it is these “differences” between people which cause war, but war is never the answer. War has no positive side. The only thing that wars can do successfully is significantly cut down the population of earth. As best said by Margaret Atwood "War is what happens when language fails.", but war can …show more content…
A war over beliefs requires a similar approach to that of a war over religion. Looking at the world through a different perspective, as well as comparing and contrasting is required to prevent a war like this from happening. An example of a war over a different set of beliefs is the American-Soviet Union cold war. The Soviets believed that communism was the ideal government, “where there would be no class systems” ensuring that no people are above others, and making sure that “everyone no matter how poor gets an education” (Chief Editor). While Americans believed that their capitalist government was superior. Where “the people own the means of production and set prices”, leading to “Economic growth and a higher standard of living” (Pettinger). With these differences the cold war started. To prepare for war both sides went back and forth attempting to out due one another in technology and weaponry, but since World War two just ended both nations agreed to not attack unless the other nation did. To attempt to end the cold war president Richard Nixon negotiated the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) prohibiting the manufacturing of nuclear arms, and agreed with the Soviet Union to settle things without the use of violence. Though the two nations looked equal in power without weapons, many European nations agreed and sided with America turning its back on the Soviet Union. The Soviets realized this and attempted to improve relations with the rest of the world the USSR, Premier Mikhail Gorbachev implemented two new policies, glasnost, which “increased openness and transparency in government institutions and activities in the Soviet Union”, and perestroika, which “was a political movement for reformation within the Communist Party” (History.com Staff). This caused the communist influence over Eastern Europe to weaken, and eventually resulted in the collapse of the communist Soviet Union putting

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, Afghanistan felt that if Iran could overthrow, then they did not need capitalism or communism either. The mujahideen fought the communist government in Afghanistan and it was back by US forces. The Taliban resulted from this because there was resentment from foreign interference from the Cold War, which later lead to terrorism. This shows that American religious ideals were linked to Iran and Afghanistan because the United States backed both of them. Americans believed it was their duty to help both countries fight communism because Americans wanted them to become capitalists.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Soviets were trying to expand their empire and the U.S. was trying to destroy communism. The Soviet Union started the Cold War and the U.S.’s response to the threat was to spread capitalism. Though one could argue that the U.S.’s interest in parts of the world far from the States caused the Soviets to protect their beliefs, the United States was trying to defend freedom of the individual. This was seen as a way to avoid future armed conflicts. The Cold War was a response to the effects communism was having on the world.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Edmond Klobucista Mr. Smith US History 2 26 April 2015 Foreign Policy of Containment Containment was a foreign policy adopted by the United States to combat the threat of Soviet influence from spreading across the world. After World War II the Soviet Union looked to spread it’s regime to Europe, Asia, and other parts of the world. The communists believed that capitalism was used to oppress the workers, so by spreading the ideals of communism they would be helping. That may seem generous however, the Soviet Union did also look to have more economic power like it’s rival the United States (Liston 116). This caused many problems.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defeating Communism

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Between 1945 and 2001, the perceived national interest of defeating Communism took precedence over the real national interest of promoting Americans’ physical and economical security. The United States entered wars in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan because they believed preventing the spread of Communism was necessary to protect the American people. However, the success of the wars did not dictate American success in the overall Cold War. Professor Brands suggested that American leaders rally the people against a singular enemy to focus foreign policy on one mission at a time. Once the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the United States needed to find a new enemy.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This bill would make countries that were financially ruined in WWII less susceptible to the spread of communism. If communism was able to spread all across Europe and to the Atlantic, America would have another treat of war. So by spending money then, they prevented a possible war that would have a greater expense. The next document from the Soviet Union tried to expose what they thought the Marshall Plan was. They had the idea that the Marshall Plan was set up so European countries will start to buy and depend on American goods.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Geography of the Cold War: What is Containment? Containment means to stop the spread of communism. America during the Cold War wanted to stop communism from spreading to other places in the world. The Soviet Union however wanted communism to spread throughout the world and they wanted to be the ones to spread it. Stalin and The Soviets believed that communism is better than capitalism and that they would win this war.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rollback requires less troops and it is the idea of using force on trying to change a country's government by trying to change their ruling. President Ronald Reagan implemented this “Rollback” idea with the Reagan Doctrine. With using less guerilla warfare to fight battles less lives were lost. With less troops fighting we could confront Soviet Union without terrible amounts of casualties (“Rollback” replaces “Containment”). This was many ways the Reagan Doctrine was involved in the Cold War, and was set up for us to bring down…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If we look at Reagan and Thatcher’s domestic policies, they had many reasons to strengthen the relations between the United States and the United Kingdom as they shared a similar vision of politics, economics and society. Regarding foreign relations, they were determined to protect the West from the communist threat. Reagan no longer wanted to follow the policy of containment, limiting the spread of the soviet block, but he wanted to roll back communism, to eradicate it rather than contain it. Thatcher was also absolutely intransigeant on communism, supported independence movements in Eastern Europe, and had been called the « Iron Lady » by the Soviets. However, Thatcher and Reagan had in mind the same goal : restore their countries’ greatness…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, article two does give Reagan some credit on the military tactics, but focused more on how Gorbachev reacted to the threat of nuclear war and how he was the main reason the war ended. Both articles show major bias toward different people. Article one shows biased toward Reagan, while article two is inclined toward Gorbachev. For example, the author of article one says “Reagan did not need a Ph.D. in economics to recognize that any economy based on centralized planners… was doomed to disastrous failure.” This comment shows how the author of article one looked down on the Soviet government and thought Regan’s government was much better. The bias in the second article begins when the author says “Not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fear of Communism spread throughout Europe in the 1930s after the Russian Revolution resulted in Russia becoming a Communist country. However, by allowing Germany to regain their strength Britain would be protected from Communist ideologies reaching the UK. The threat of Communism’s importance as a reason is clear when historian Ian Kershaw stated, ‘Germany was seen as the best hope of preventing the spread of Bolshevism.’ Therefore, highlighting that Germany’s strength was imperative to Britain if they wanted the security of their democracy ensured. In 1933 Lord Rothermere expressed in the Daily Mail that, ‘Sturdy young Nazis’ were Europe’s guardian against the Communist danger’ emphasising that not only was it important for Britain that Germany regained their strength so that they could combat communism before it reached the UK, but also that during this time Nazism was more favourably than Communism. Overall, it is arguable that the fear of Communism influenced the government into adopting a policy of appeasement as Britain would then be protected from the spread of Bolshevism.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays