The Pros And Cons Of Virtue Ethics

Good Essays
The strongest objection to such a view would be the actions committed to the criminals for what they’ve done their victims. For example, a criminal raped a victim. If one was to follow the principle of lex talionis, the criminal’s punishment would be to be raped because that was what the criminal had to done to their victim. This is extremely wrong because the action is immoral in of itself and the person employing the punishment is no better than the criminal. The only thing separating the criminal and person employing the punishment is their position.
I don’t think this objection can be overcome because this is a problem that cannot be solved with the principle of lex talionis or a thinking similar along the lines. Even despite this objection,
…show more content…
(255) The point of virtue ethics is to become a more virtuous person, and virtue is a character trait, which defines the person. Habits and actions that are right fail to be morally admirable because they are not virtuous. To be virtuous is to have good inner life where you know what is important, what is right, why it is right, and you do the action because it is right. For example, a person is virtuous when they decide to clean up after themselves because they know it is right to be responsible for their mess and they do clean it up because it is responsible and they know they do this in order not to cause trouble for others. An example of when a person fails to be morally admirable is when a guy decides to open a door for a struggling, old lady in order to show a girl he is interested that he was courteous. While the action was the right thing to do, it fails to be morally admirable because the guy did not do the action because it was right, he did it in order to show …show more content…
They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice.
This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right. Consequentialism said that morality of an action depend on its results. If good came out of the action, despite the fact that the fact may be questionable, then what the person has done is morally right. Kant’s duty based ethics view said that morality was based on intentions that were universalizability. Virtue ethics deems that morality is gained through experience, training, and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Having a goodwill is unique in that the fact that is is always deemed moral and right, even if it fails to achieve its intentions. As long as you have good intentions in mind, that is what is important. In Kant’s ethics, the concept of goodwill is a more broad term for a will. A will is something that comes from your duty, and your duty is doing what you need to do to keep the moral law. Our acts that are done in correspondence with our duty are good and needed, but Kant says that the acts performed out of duty are the acts that have moral worth and are given a special esteem.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is it the golden rule of treating others the way you would want to be treated? Acting on impulse because it feels good? Or doing your duty because it is your “job” to do so? One cannot determine what is "right" and what is "wrong"; it must be taught or shown to us by means of common sense and unified agreement. At the same time, influence of the self- its own interests, wants and needs- play a bigger role in what creates ones ' moral standpoint.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Someone who supports Kantianism would argue that they are right and say that a person is good because they always do what is right. However, that does not tell the whole story. By no means am I arguing that doing what is right or fulfilling your moral duty doesn’t make a person good, but what makes a person more good is having a good character. A genuinely good person does not do good things just solely because they are required to by law or should do it. They do good things because it is in their nature and they value these…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, your morals and virtues are what lead you to make that decision and ultimately the consequences that came with the decision not only affected you but everyone around you. The next reason why I believe virtue ethics to be more consequentialist than non-consequentialist is because the characteristics between a person who has virtue ethics has ethical egoism. According to Vaughn (P. 70) “the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over for oneself. The decision that somebody makes when dealing with different circumstances leads them to make decisions that will make them feel and look good in front of people. Someone with the mentality of an ethical egotist will think first about the consequences about the decision that they are about to make.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Being the person one ought to be has a great deal to do with what the right thing is, or the moral thing to do. With some other theories one isn’t sure, or is left without a complete guide on what to do, and this can be frustrating. The structure that CEE uses is simply morality involves recognizing the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with actions, reactions, and interactions that reflect an appreciation of human value. Immorality involves a failure to recognize the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with a failure to act, react, and interact in ways that reflect an appreciation of human value. With this principle humans can use the rational, cognitive processes that we are capable of to determine and discover what is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By emphasizing the importance of character traits, Aristotle gives humans credit that they can be good people performing activities because of their character not just because of rules they ought to follow. The only weak point in the theory is the reliance on virtue being essential to happiness. It fails to consider that everyone is different, unlike character traits/moral virtues which can vary from person to person or culture to culture. If the ethics of virtue applied all of its components more universally, realizing that everyone is different and that some virtuous people are not happy and some non-virtuous people are, it would make a more sound…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy. There is, however, a defining difference between morality and ethics. An individual that recognizes the difference between right and wrong and still chooses to do right is moral. Ethics are moral values in action, and this means that morality is apparent in those who do the right thing despite it being hard or dangerous. Utilitarians are of the mindset that one should do that which will produce the most happiness.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It involves assessing what the people perceive to be moral and taking actions which will produce insignificant consequences on the people other than the individual performing the act. REGARDING EITHER THEORIST 6. As provided by Kant on his ethical theory, the standard of living an ethical life entails carrying out the logical reasoning behind the actions which are perceived to be moral. Kant argued that it is not a matter of following what the norm have stated to be moral but rather questioning the reason behind taking certain actions (Ross 37). Mill on the other hand in his utilitarian ethical theory based standards of living an ethical life on the ability of one to achieve maximum happiness from the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Theories Of Virtue Ethics

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Its fundamental moral question is, “What sort of character would a virtuous person have?” Conversely, Utilitarian ethics and deontological ethics place emphasis on the actions of the individual as the core of their morality. In both cases, the theories beg the question, “What makes an action right?” Utilitarian ethics and deontological ethics endeavor to clarify the principles of ethical judgment which guide a person in figuring out what they should do or are expected to do in a given situation. On the other hand, virtue ethics emphasize that being virtuous person is more important than knowing about the rules or principles. A virtuous person will automatically do good deeds in any given situation because he is instinctively conditioned to always do so. Utilitarian ethics differ from deontological ethics as it claims that morality is based on the degree of happiness that an action produces while ignoring the quality of the action used to create said happiness.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics