The Pros And Cons Of Unreasonable Search And Seizure

Is a person's private property really private? Unreasonable search and seizures where he or she feels violated by a sheriff or police officer because they did not have a warrant on them to search the person or their property. The right that is being discussed is protection against illegal search of self, home, or property. A person has the right and should always say no if a sheriff or police officer do not have a warrant with them. Most people say this, “fruit of the poisonous tree”(Understanding Search-and-Seizure Law). Because the evidence is a product of an illegal search. Tree means evidence that the police illegally seize in the place. Fruit means second-generation product of the illegally seized evidence. This right goes under the 4th Amendment because the right of the people to be secure in their persons, …show more content…
Unreasonable search and seizures is an issue where each side, the citizens and the law (police) want protection, what's right and to be heard, but their reasons are divided and desired outcomes are generally …show more content…
This is current issue a because there have been many stories of sheriff's or police officers searching people, houses, properties, or cars without warrant. The law must have a warrant to collect all evidence, “probable cause,” (Search and Seizure and The Fourth Amendment). Probable cause is the requirement in criminal law that police have adequate reason to search people or property without a warrant. But enough evidence to search quickly to prevent injury or loss of evidence. As of right now,there is really not an organization that is working to protect the right and the rights of citizens involved in unreasonable search and seizure situations. Citizens and government need to work to understand this right so each side is protected. Both sides would have fewer negative outcomes of an unreasonable search or