The Pros And Cons Of Universal Adoption Of Moral Relativism

Improved Essays
Although universal adoption of moral relativism can be seen as counterintuitive and destructive, there are some objections to the arguments aforementioned. The main objection to be mentioned is the lack of a plain “black and white” set of moral truths. The moral truths that are mentioned in moral absolutism are not explicitly laid out somewhere, so this leaves skeptics to ask, “Are we supposed to just believe that there are certain moral truths just out there somewhere?” In a way, yes, because there are plenty of undeniable facts or truths that are discovered and believed even though they cannot be seen. For example, gravity can be measured, but it cannot be seen itself, just the effects it has on other things. This being said, moral truths

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism In Sports

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The rest of the problems with moral relativism is that no matter what anyone’s views are they can’t be seen as wrong. Its viewed as an opinion of we approve or disapprove. This is because of the way cultural relativism and subjectivism is set up. It may appeal to people but it allows everyone to be right in their own eyes. Moral progress is also a problem because a person’s deepest beliefs can be true by definition, in result they…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If individuals had no moral values, everyone would be running around without a care in the world and solely worried about themselves. There would be no awareness for anybody or anything so we would turn into selfish human beings. Ethical relativism is “the doctrine that the moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society and that there are no absolute universal moral standards binding on all men at all times” (Pojman, 14). There are some moral values worldwide that are just adopted overtime and for that I will support Louis Pojman and what he states about ethical relativism being an incoherent theory, how it is much bigger than just individuals or even societies. I strive to hit on conventionalism and subjectivism, which have their up sides but ultimately diminish Pojman’s argument on ethical relativism.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense, Anthropologist Ruth Benedict supports the concept of moral relativism in “The Case For Moral Relativism.” Benedict starts by asserting that morals are cultural norms and that morals are culturally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the most part, I believe Americans would like to make decisions based on moral absolutism as that seems to be right decision to make, but in all reality, guidance is based on moral relativism due to so many variables that take place today. Ruth Benedict discusses in A Defense of Ethical Relativism what various cultures viewed as a moral absolutism in a particular part of the world but may be seen as moral relativism in another part. Benedict discussed homosexuality as being accepted in the American Indian tribe years ago but one would have never thought it possible when thinking about the era of cowboys and Indians as they portrayed a very masculine image. The Northwest Coast civilization’s known practice was when an individual was killed,…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel McDowell Bellevue University Assignment 5.1 It is not an easy, in fact it is almost impossible, to choose between moral absolutism and moral relativism as a guide that the American society should use for making moral decisions. Both moral relativism and moral absolutism offer solutions to moral problems, but each will give completely different answers to the problem. Many great philosophers in history have debated on one side or another. In my opinion I side with the anthropologist Ruth Benedict and believe relativism is the better way to think and the best choice for moral decision-making because.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another kind of relativism is cultural relativism. This is probably my favorite kind of relativism because it is the act of looking at a person, and then looking at their cultural background and looking at it as a whole to better understand their morals. Like I mentioned earlier, when someone sees the reasoning behind something, they are less likely to judge. If someone has a moral that you do not agree with or understand, it really helps to understand the person first, and understand his or her thought process and cultural influence behind it. Anthropologists such as Sumner and Boas helped put this theory together and also helped researchers understand the people that they were studying because they then stepped back and took the time to understand their patients cultural background instead of just looking at them as a human.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, the land of the free and home of the brave. In the 1920s America was the land of the liberal-minded urbanites and home of the traditional fundamentalists, divided by the stronghold call morals. The fundamentalists were people who mostly lived in the rural areas of America. These fundamentalists believed the city was a trick from the devil, the streets are littered with drunks and people who would mongrelize the American race. They wanted the pure white protestant race to be the only successful race in America.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second consequence is the loss of accountability for the actions within a society itself. The morality of an action would be solely based on the standards of the society, not based on human rights or a universal social contract. The issue therein is that there is also nothing to keep the society morally sound. If murdering a blonde abides by the moral code within the society, then the act of murder itself in that society is not morally wrong. Rachels posits the argument that if Cultural Relativism restricts one from the criticizing the actions of/in other countries, then it can also forbid one from criticizing one’s own.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Moral Relativism

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After looking at this video I do not believe that there are any throughgoing moral relativists. Even Martin Luther King Junior was not thorougoing moral relativits. Thoroughgoing moral relativists believes that there is no difference on how people “should” behave, as oppose to how people believe they should behave. Moral relativism is the view that what's morally right or wrong always depends on your culture or society. Dr. Robert George states in the video that it would be hard to live life as a consistant moral relativist who does not make any kinds of moral claim and supposes anything that anybody did was acceptable and nothing could be wrong (Colson Center for Christian Worldview, n.d., series 2).…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays