The Pros And Cons Of Thorium

Improved Essays
Is Thorium a good alternative?
Thorium is a slightly radioactive metal that is made in rocks and soils, it is a significant replacement for uranium in the nuclear energy sector.

As we continue to remain uncertain of our future supply of uranium, thorium is being seriously considered as an alternative to uranium to provide us with nuclear power at not only a reasonable cost but is also abundantly safe. For example, India has been looking at thorium for years, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). Still, much more research and development is required.

Thorium in the works
In 2013, privately owned Norwegian company Thor Energy answered the question for us of whether thorium works for energy production and began to produce power at its Halden
…show more content…
There are many other firms from the US, Australia and the Czech Republic who have also been working on this research project.

How thorium energy works
Unlike uranium, thorium can’t split to make a nuclear chain reaction — in scientific terms, it isn’t fissile. However, if it is bombarded by neutrons from a fuel that is fissile, like uranium-235 or plutonium-239, it’s converted to uranium-233. After this process begins, fission of uranium-233 turns thorium into the same nuclear fuel. There are many complications to this process.

Thorium vs. uranium
Thorium is a fascinating alternative to uranium to many. It is both lower in cost and more of it is available than there is uranium, whose price is expected to rise even more. There are other benefits as well. During a thorium-powered nuclear reaction, most of the thorium is consumed, which leads to less waste, most of which is declared non-hazardous in 30 years. The most dangerous nuclear waste material currently in use must be stored for 10,000 years. Furthermore, 1 metric ton of thorium is equal to 250 metric tons in terms of efficiency in a water

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Uranium mining is seen to be the future of energy, It is rich in source of clean energy that is critical in combating change ( Campbell et al., 1980). With the risks, uranium portends great benefits to countries. It is a good source of nuclear energy that potential produces insignificant amount of greenhouse gases. In addition, if well harnessed, it can be used to generate more power that oil, natural gas and coal…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Radioactive waste disposal is an undoubtedly big issue with having uranium as an energy source. A nuclear power plant creates 20 metric tons of nuclear fuel every year which is an unhealthy amount of nuclear fuel and waste. The nuclear waste transfers high temperature and radiation to the area it’s being produced in, and they are both absolutely damaging to the environment and the living plants and animals that live there. Nuclear Accidents is another large issue with using uranium as an energy source.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reid Farmer Mr P. Fluoride Thorium Reactor 27 April 2016 Fluoride Thorium Reactors The liquid fluoride thorium reactor is a supply of nuclear fuel in the form of a molten salt mixture. A Molten Salt Reactors, such as Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor produces energy using a liquid nuclear fuel, not a solid fuel. MSRs also use a coolant that remains liquid at atmospheric pressure. LFTRs are designed to convert Thorium, an inexpensive and abundant material, into Uranium-233 which can then undergo nuclear fission.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear waste is awful, luckily thanks to research and persistence it can be disposed of. Further according to “No ‘’Show Stopper’’ at Proposed Nuclear Dump.” “The U.S. government has spent three decades And $6 billion trying to find a permanent home for the radioactive material left over from Nuclear power plants and munitions factories. ”(No Show Stopper n.pag)…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear power has many positives to using them over any other type of power. An example of this is a reliable energy source because it can operate 24/7 for 18-24 months and it stops so the workers can refuel it. Another reason is this type of power does not release anything into the air and helps fight global warming because the power plants have avoided 64 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases. There's only been three major accidents produces less radioactive material than coal plants. Those are just some of the reasons why it is better than other types of power.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe. Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Low pollution, Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. Nuclear energy has one of the least effect on nature, since it doesn’t discharge any greenhouse gasses. Low operating cost, Nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Since the cost of a nuclear reactor is anywhere between from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being used. Reliability, There has been an estimation that with the current rate of consumption of uranium, We may have enough uranium for 70-80 years.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The term “nuclear engineering” often denotes connotation of war derived from the use of atomic bombs at the end of World War Two. Wartime often heavily influences the intention of research and World War Two was no different. Although, outside of war, nuclear engineering’s emphasis is as a source of power. With the turn of the 21st century, realization of increasing energy demands, awareness of the importance of energy security, and concerns about global warming have surfaced. With such realizations, energy focus shifted to alternative and renewable power sources to replace the finite processes using fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas.…

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tritium Research Paper

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tritium is a waste product from nuclear power plants and is less dangerous than radium. Radium was used for illuminating light, but scientists found out that it can cause cancer. Now, Tritium is used for producing…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Uranium is currently the sole raw material for generating nuclear energy. Nuclear power is a limited resource. Most countries which use nuclear energy rely on other countries for the constant fuel supply. Since its mined like any other metal, uranium’s availability is limited. Once we extract it all, nuclear plants will be rendered useless.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    s nuclear power worth the risk? Are the positive aspects of nuclear power worth the possible negative outcomes? To use nuclear power, Uranium atoms must split, which is called fission. The heat produced from fission is what makes the water turn into steam. The steam is what makes the turbines turn and the turbines are used to generate electricity.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is debatable, whether or not the positives outweigh the negatives. The main positives of mining Uranium include, nuclear power, relatively cheap, it is found everywhere and does not emit harmful gases to the environment. Nuclear energy is very cheap, and effective, it just takes a lot of maintenance and attention. Additionally, the process of making electricity from uranium through nuclear fission, is not harmful to the environment, in comparison to other fossil fuels. As mentioned above, Uranium is found everywhere, even in the ocean.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The paper detailed how the energy was to be analysed, and also cited many sources saying that it can be analysed, and that the results would reflect reality. And while the efficiency in a nuclear reactor is approximately the same, the amount of energy produced is much higher. Even though the turbine technology is the same, the amount of heat in kWh produced by one kilogram of uranium is approximately 24 million compared to 8 from coal and 12 from mineral oil [4]. While these numbers aren’t precise, they give a general understanding of comparison.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2007, more than 90% of the uranium used in nuclear power reactors was imported.” Uranium currently is estimated to cost about 50 dollars per pound, not including transportation costs and mining fees. Multiply that number by several thousand pounds and the cost and dependence on foreign countries is…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays