The Pros And Cons Of The Two-State Solution

Improved Essays
Palestinians and Israeli people have been in a conflict for over 70 years over land. Many politicians have been searching for answers to the conflict, with the most prominent ‘solution’ being called the two-state solution. The two-state solution is the idea the Israel and Palestine are going to sign peace treaties and split the land they’ve been fighting each other for in half. The idea of Palestine and Israel getting along is strange, considering that while Palestinians don’t hate Israeli people, the country of Israel mostly hates Palestine. While the two-state solution could work in favor of Palestine and Israel, it is hard to see them agreeing on sharing land. The following arguments are against the two-state solution from the point of view of Palestine, Israel, the general United States population and how they differ from the opinion of American politicians. …show more content…
While Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Democrats are okay politicians, none of them have a better plan than the two-state solution. Sanders is an older Jewish man who doesn’t have sympathy for Palestinian people, so while his other beliefs are better, he doesn't exactly endorse the Palestinian nation at all (Weiss). Rather than the two-state solution, the more grim reality is that there just might not be a solution at all, and that Israel is going to get their way (Barnett). Due to how leaders are chosen in Israel and Palestine, and how well the two current leaders get along, there’s just the hope that Palestine stays strong for a few more years. The likelihood of that is quite slim though, in fact, “During and immediately following the state’s creation in 1948, Israel expropriated approximately 4,244,776 acres of Palestinian land,” (Institute for Middle East

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Israel Dbq Analysis

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Some people create their own storms, then get upset when it rains,” quoted an anonymous speaker. On May Fourteenth of 1948, Israel was created as a nation-state on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea in Southwest Asia. Its creation as a nation state, for both the Jews and Palestinians, made history, for better or worse. Israel’s founding has a been a topic focused on around the world for both the justifications of its making, along with the repercussions of its founding. The bringing forth and creation of Israel, along with the consequences of its making can be linked to the Jewish want for Zionism, the interaction of international groups of influence, conflicts between the people in and out of its borders, and the anti-Semitic relationships…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When George W. Bush became president his policy towards Israel brought forth the idea of Palestine becoming a state on its own. President George W. Bush believed that this policy would bring the end to the fighting and ongoing and never-ending tension between Israel and Palestine. He did however understand that if we as a country could not find a solution to bring peace to those that Israel has tension with. That Israel would once again take matters into their own hands and do everything in their power, since they receive aid from the United States, to put an end to their enemies if confronted. When Israel started their settlements the United States realized that it would bring more problems than solutions.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since there was a rise in anti-Semitism, a man named Theodor Herzl’s dreamt of a Zionist movement where Jews would gain their own separate nation, which soon became a reality in what became Israel. Survivors of the Holocaust would flee into Israel, which triggered anger amongst the Palestinians because they “viewed Jewish independence as a betrayal of their own interests, and they attacked the Jewish state as soon as it was proclaimed.” This would spark a range of conflicts between the Israelites and Palestinians where Israelites continued to gain more territory of Palestine. Since the end of World War II, there were numerous battles between Israelis and Palestinians that stretched to the modern day era where Hamas won the 2006 election in Gaza. Hamas looked to return Palestinian territory conquered by Israel to the people and emitted violence to achieve his goal.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 13 Outline

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages

    After the Statement was written conflicts came about between the Palestinians and the Jewish…

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, the letter to Lord Rothschild by British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, which became known as the “Balfour Declaration”, announced the creation of a Jewish state to the world. Arthur James Balfour wrote this letter to Britain’s most illustrious Jewish citizen, Baron Lionel Walter Rothschild, expressing the British government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, writing “His Majesty’s Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object...” This shows Britain promised the Jewish people that they will favor the establishment in Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people. To continue, the Sykes-Picot agreement led to the division of Turkish-held Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine into various French- and British-administered areas.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jewish Homeland Dbq

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Zionist goal of establishing a Jewish homeland has always been opposed by the Arab leaders in the Middle East. There was a rapid influx of Jews to Palestine from the time the Great War ended. As new immigrants, they purchased land to live and farm on, but then banned Arabs from living on that land. The Jews’ goal was to establish localities based around farming. Additionally, these communities would be for Jews only, meaning they would not hire any Arab employees.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He has little to no experience in this area and will need to rely heavily on his staff if he is elected to office. I personally have heard many people condemn him for allegedly being a Zionist with unwavering support for the Israeli government however, since the beginning of this campaign he has advocated only for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine and has acknowledged both nations’ rights to exist. Additionally, he was also a major supporter of the recent Iran nuclear deal which further cements my belief that he respects that Islamic Republics have a right to sovereignty even if he may not always agree with their actions. What is troubling is that he has said little of the civil war in Syria, the subsequent refugee crisis or whether or not the international community should take action to prevent a U.S- Russian proxy war. Regardless, Bernie’s record of opposing every intervention in the last half-century with the exception of Afghanistan will surely win him the support of many anti-war…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only way to reach peace would be for them both to give in a little. Nevertheless neither side seems at all ready to do such a…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 28, 2016, John Kerry gives a two-state solution speech. His plan is to aim to keep the two-state solution risk-free. He wanted to abstain from condemning Israeli settlements. Kerry thought this was the only way to achieve lasting peace between Israel and Palestine. John Kerry wanted both sides to commit to further negotiations, much like the Oslo Accords.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States Relations

    • 1559 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many of the opponents that fought against Israel are still in opposition today. The primary issue facing the area today is the cruel treatment of the Palestinian refugees. Israel’s oppressive military is mistreating families who are trying to return to their home. Surprisingly, this is not an everyday topic for the United States. Many Americans do not know the severity of the situation or realize how much it affects them.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then in 2003 President George W. Bush went back on his policy of peacemaking. He instead took the blame off of Israel and said that it was because of Palestine that the issues and tension still exist. That the issues came from Palestine having corrupted and evil leaders and that the people are wrong for listening to them and following their lead. Then he stated that the lines drawn in 1949 were unrealistic to the mission of Israel and that they did not need to return the land to Palestine. That the land in the West Bank.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will discuss how the Oslo Peace Process came about, and why it failed. I will talk about the contributing factors that led to its failure, and I will give a personal opinion at the end on the entire peace process and future of the Middle East. After WWI, the League of Nations established the Mandate for Palestine. It included all the land that was Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (League of Nations, 1922). The 1917 Balfour Declaration supported the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, “Nothing shall be done to prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine” (Balfour, 1917).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the Muslims were united and followed the path of God, then the collective strength of the Muslim nation is so great that this cruelty against Palestine could never have taken place” (Ahmed). Ahmeds’ point is that if Israel cannot establish peace and justice within themselves how are they supposed to relay those values to Palestinians. Two wrongs don’t make a right, and in this case both sides continue to lash back at each other committing one war crime after the next with no gain of peace what so ever. The President of the State of Palestine Ahmoud Abbas States “Our efforts are not aimed at isolating Israel or de-legitimizing it: rather we want to gain legitimacy for the case of the people of Palestine. We only aim to de-legitimize the settlement activities and the occupation and apartheid and the logic of the ruthless force, and we believe all countries of the world stand with us in this regard” (Abbas).…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Israelis are unwilling to lose their status as a Jewish state, but there is no possible way the Palestinians would agree to live and coexist in a Jewish state. A joint council of Israeli and Palestinian representatives would not work because there would constantly be a 50/50 split, and it would be difficult for any decisions to be made. Because of this, any development of a combined Palestinian-Israeli state would be limited. Member of the Israeli Knesset for the Labor Party, Hilik Bar, said, “One state would be the end of the Zionist dream and it would eliminate the dream of the Palestinians to have a state of their own. With this, we would doom ourselves to perpetual conflict, a lose-lose situation” (Bar).…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I/ Introduction: This paper was commissioned by Ms Xiang Gao, a lecture at International Pacific College (IPC). Its purpose is to examine and analyse the conflict between Palestine and Israel in Middle East. The conflict between Israel and Palestine can be considered the most intractable conflict in the world.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays