• Home Page
  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs

Improved Essays
Show More
Immagine if the controversy and devastation from the first nuclear bombs came back, but worse? Well, they are because a group of scientists believe that they have discovered a weapon of mass destruction more powerful than the any nuclear weapon we currently have. A nuclear bomb is an explosive device that gets its energy from nuclear reactions occurring inside the bomb. The reason why it was so controversial is because the destructive power of this weapon is massive. The first time it was used, was to end the war in the Pacific. This killed many innocent, civilians, which added to the controversy. The United States should not further develop a new weapon of mass destruction because nuclear weapons today are powerful enough, there is no need for weapons at this time, and during the development and use of the …show more content…
The reason why is because there is no jurassic need to end a war quickly. The nuclear weapon was made because the world was at war, and the government of the United States wanted to end the war quicker to save many American lives. There is currently no war going on, of that magnitude. The nuclear bomb saved countless lives, but now, there is no where near as many lives to be saved from wars today. During this age, the situation does not call for an even more powerful weapon. This and the fact, countries settle disputes rather than going to war, and if they do go to war, they may not use nuclear weapons. The reason is because “neither the United States nor its enemies will ever start a nuclear war because the other side will retaliate massively and unacceptably”(Parrington). This means that for fear of utter destruction from the other side, countries will not start a massive war. Having little to no wars means that actually using weapons are unnecessary. If the weapons today, like nuclear bombs, are not being used, then why develop more powerful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Argical Analysis Of Eric Schlosser Today's Nuclear Weapons
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argical Analysis Of Eric Schlosser Today's Nuclear Weapons

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    On December 7, 1941, Japan attacked the American naval base at Pearl Harbor. This attack forced the United States into the war, and just a day later the U.S. declared war on Japan. During the summer of 1945, Japan became a weak and destroyed country, but they were unwilling to pull out of the war. The United States gave Japan the offer to surrender numerous times, and if they did not agree complete destruction of Japan was coming. The United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a few days of each other.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Incendiary Bombing
    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Incendiary Bombing

    Conventional bombing was not chosen as the primary method of ending the war because of the importance of the atomic bomb. Due to all countries involved in the war, allies and axis powers, attempting to build a nuclear bomb first, the desire to create a monopoly appeared. Although conventional bombing had proved how destructive and effective it could be, policy makers did not strongly consider the option because demonstrating their atomic bomb before other countries was far more important and clearly was a way to end the…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bomb And Limits In Wartime
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bomb And Limits In Wartime

    I feel that the debate on the nuclear bomb and limits in wartime was overall a weak one. Both sides struggled to get their points across and explain them in a way that someone could understand them. The facts and evidence were present for most of the debate, but the connections to make great points were not. Out of all the points I feel the con side’s claim that there was alternatives to the nuclear bomb was lacking the most. This was due to the fact that whenever they were asked for any supporting evidence or examples of alternatives to the bomb they would shrug the asker off and move on.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Pros And Cons
    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons Pros And Cons

    There is no absolutely safe defense against a nuclear bomb, so as shown through history, nuclear weapons are their own deterrents. To stop wars, nuclear weapons, such as atomic bombs, were used, but in order for the enemy to combat those weapons, they had to develop nuclear armaments themselves, which creates a cycle where the production of weapons instigates the production of more weapons16. This led to the situation in the 2000s when there were, “[…] 32,000 nuclear bombs possessed by eight nations containing 5,000 megatons of destructive energy. This is a global arsenal more than sufficient to destroy the world”17. It was only after the cold war, when the Soviet Union and the United States of America were competing to develop more and more deadly weapons in larger quantities, did countries realize that there was no need for all of the weapons they had created, and thus agreed to limit themselves to only enough weapons to eliminate the enemy.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission

    It was not made for dangerous weapons and killing, though some chemicals used in the process are dangerous, they were suppose to be used for other purposes and not for a path that has destruction in its way. Initially, there have been many threats with nuclear weapons and it makes people fear it and it harms many. Some nuclear power plant accidents can be really dangerous and can radiate a large area with toxic chemicals. The only way to prevent this would be to buy new reactors which will cost a range between…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Using The Atomic Bomb
    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Using The Atomic Bomb

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    The decision to use the atomic bomb was partially a show-off of American strength over its enemies. The impact of the bombing on human beings and the environment is quite enormous and it is felt for many generations after the war. Those in favor of the bomb argued that dropping the bomb is better than invading Japan because it will save lives. This I do not agree with,…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    In reality, through the analysis of the United States decision, including who advised against it, and the direct results of this choice, one can certainly determine that it was unnecessary and did more harm than good. The United States decision to drop the atomic bomb had, and continues to have, a significant negative impact on the people of Japan; effects that the American government was aware of prior to their decision. President Truman's decision has been debated by historians for years, and there has yet to be a…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    Has war ever been the most unnecessary way of winning a competition? Seems like one of the worst ways to get things under control. Why do we need dead bodies lying across the land for no particular reason? That is why the atomic bomb should be talked about. An atomic bomb is one of the most destructive ways of ending all problems.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Was President Truman's Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified?
    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was President Truman's Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified?

    During World War II the world was advancing quickly in the realms of science specifically, science that had to do with weapons, the largest of these advancements was the creation of atomic bomb, this is undeniably the deadliest weapon in human history, the splitting of the atom, the smallest substance of matter, can cause an unimaginable amount of destruction. Since the bombs creation the world has generally come to the consensus that it is unethical, and immoral for a country to use it against someone else. However, there always has to be an exception, and that exception is of course the United States when they dropped the bomb on Japan at the end of World War 2. President Truman justified his decision to drop the bomb by claiming that it…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    The decision to use nuclear weapons The decision, made by the United States of America, to drop nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not have been the most popular or best choice for the planet; but however, it was the choice that needed to be made to end the war in the pacific. This decision was made so that both sides would suffer the lowest number of casualties possible. The United States had a conference with Japanese leaders to attempt to bring the war to an end peacefully, however the Japanese had made it very clear to the United States and president Truman that they had no intention of abandoning the code of honor they live by and would fight until the last man. After this conference the Decision to drop…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    As the second World War was drawing to a close in the Pacific theater, the United States ultimately decided to use its new weapon that they have been developing in the top-secret Manhattan Project, the atomic bomb, on Japan on August 6th, 1945. The United States, including Truman and top military officials such as Secretary of War Stimson, opted to use the weapon for a variety of reasons including drawing the war to a quick end. While the U.S. ultimately used nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, other options were available for the top government and military officials to consider. After seventy years of the U.S. using these nuclear weapons, much debate still exists on whether the use of the atomic bombs was the correct decision, especially…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War And Communism Essay
    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cold War And Communism Essay

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Negative Consequences Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Negative Consequences Of The Atomic Bomb

    These people have the idea that the quantity of people that died for the explosion of the atomic bomb were unnecessary deaths. Also some has made some theories about new sickness that has been developed as a consequence of the atomic explosion none of these theories has any proof. For that reason until they discover the reality of these sickness these arguments has none value at all. The reasons that the other side emphasized the most is the one that said that many countries has developed their own atomic bomb after they saw the explosion of Hiroshima. I really think that the reason that theses countries have developed their own weapons in not consequence to the explosion.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings