New Nuclear Era Or Continued Peace

Improved Essays
New Nuclear Era or Continued Peace The world has seen the use of Nuclear Weapons only twice in combat, both uses were during World War 2 and used by and first developed by the United States. Since then the majority of dominant Nations have each amassed large quantities and stores of their own Nuclear weapons. Ranging from bombs, to Intercontinental Ballistic missiles, and MIRV’s or multiple independently target-able re-entry vehicles. Most countries of the world have some sort of nuclear weapon and yet we have remained civilized enough to this day to refrain from their use in war against each other. While the world made it through the Cold War with some very tense moments, a contemporary version of the conflict could be upon the world and United States now. A world with no nuclear weapons would be an ideal one, as would a world with no war. However as humans, that are constantly evolving and finding the newest, most deadly weapons that we can invent that world will likely never be a reality. While the United States, Russia and the majority of the rest of the world know we cannot use nuclear weapons in war, we continue to build, store, …show more content…
Though removing land based missiles from America may be a viable option, there is no saying if Russia would follow suit, or keep their launch sites intact thus giving them a potential upper hand. Land based sites may be more easily attacked from an enemy, but if an enemy nation has come as far as attacking a launch site, it’s fair to assume use of nuclear weapons may already be occurring. And in that case even if all land based sites were lost, there would still be enough sea and air nukes. The tertiary system works because it has room for multiple failures, we should not give up on it until the threat of attack is virtually

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3- According to this article, there is a nuclear war predicted to happen in the near future between the U.S. and Russia. Each one of them has nuclear weapons and tries to build bigger bombs and more accurate missiles to ensure its security. In this article, Donella Meadows illustrates that there is another solution to ensure each country’s security; it is so simple that children can come up with. The solution is that both countries have to get rid of their nuclear weapons. In order to prove that, Meadows quoted two conversations from a journal called “Nuclear Concerns and Humankind”.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author argues that these changes have increased the threat of nuclear weapons as Russia has lowered the threshold for using them. Schlosser then brings up an example of NATO in the cold war. NATO used a strategy to disperse tactical weapons to the frontline to deter a Soviet invasion. Schlosser then states that the authorization for firing the weapons was deregulated and thus the threat of the weapons being fired accidently rose substantially.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a altitude of 306 meters, there is a inscription of the defeat reason summary. “Due to the United State used atomic bomb and Soviet Union disobey the Non-aggression treaty, and as well as the resources shortages and some other reason, Japan could not defeat.” Japan thought they lost because the United State drop the atomic bomb. In my opinion, I support for what President Truman did.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The military also supports the disarmament of nuclear weapons, as nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, as a small nuclear bomb can wipe out large tracts of land. These are very hard to defend against, as stated, “Bullets kill men, but atomic bombs kill cities. A tank is a defense against a bullet, but there is no defense against a weapon that can destroy civilization. . . Our defense is law and order”15. One of the problems of nuclear weapons is the slippery slope created by the threat of them.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why nuclear bombs haven’t been used since World War II is because it’s expensive making nuclear bombs. The United States have weapons with unbelievable destructive power. Nuclear bombs are so deadly that it has the ability to destroy places and kill people that are far away in only minutes. Nuclear weapons are deadly weapons.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the United States first developed the nuclear bomb it had secured its place as the most powerful nation in the world. There was no need for deterrence back then because nobody else had acquired nuclear bombs yet. Essentially the United States could get away with nuking anyone without any major consequences and without sending any ground troops. Only a few planes were needed to do the trick. It was only a matter of time before another state pursued the same technology and within a few years, the USSR had succeeded.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reagan had said to many that it was “ the saddest day of my presidency and probably the most saddest day of my entire life.” (“Cannon, 2008”) It was not only a sad day for him, but a sad day for all. Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan both came to an agreement later on and signed a treaty called, Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty in December 1987, at the Washington Summit. This treaty will “ eliminate an entire class of intermediate-range nuclear missiles.”…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People had threatened war in the past to get what they wanted. Hitler threatened Czechoslovakians with war if they didn’t concede territory to the Third Reich. But nuclear weapons allowed one nation to threaten another with the prospect of death to the majority of their citizens, and the irradiation of their land; thus making it uninhabitable. Nikita Khrushchev is the first name to come to mind for nuclear threats. He did this many times.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even with discontinuance of the cold war, military continues to develop; this has lapsed the spending especially in the deployment of nuclear-armed and ballistic missiles along with defensive systems. Due to the fact that there was no formalized treaty ending the Cold War, the former influential nations have continued to desperate lengths. This caused them to depend on their economies to maintain and push to improve, even modify existing nuclear weapons. Many states had taken into consideration the potential risk to national and international security, which pushed them to acknowledge nuclear-weapons states had inherited major responsibilities in protecting sustaining the balance of their nuclear forces. To elaborate on risks, there are accidental and unauthorized nuclear havoc which not only puts the military in danger it puts civilians into that category as well.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays