Iran Nuclear Weapons Problem

Improved Essays
For many years the conquest to eliminate the threat of weapons of mass destruction has been both a hobby and a major struggle for America. In recent light, yet not so recent, the struggle to rid Iran of its nuclear capabilities has seen heightened debate on whether a deal has the power to do so. Through a span of twelve years, this deal, most commonly referred to as the Iran deal, has seen negotiations with the five major members of the U.N. Within this deal there is a desire to eliminate the possibility for Iran to create nuclear weapons; by confiscating crucial necessities to the process plutonium and uranium, as well as implementing the supervision of U.N. officials at their nuclear facilities. However, with any deal, there are parties …show more content…
A writer like Gary Samore argues this position, adding that this deal postpones any threat in the near future; however, this is not an indefinite way to approach this issue. At the start of his article he assures that there is much confusion of Iran’s capabilities stating that “Under the tentative deal, Iran’s production of plutonium… along with enriched uranium----is constrained indefinitely” (Samore et al.pg.28). With the production of plutonium and enriched uranium constrained Iran loses out on producing the main ingredients required to create a nuclear arsenal. Further constraints will be had on the amount of centrifuges allowed; which will further slow the creation of nuclear weapons. Where the problem may lie is with the short duration of these constraints; after only ten years, these constraints will lessen and then after fifteen no constraints at all. Those that oppose this deal are looking for stricter regulations with more pressure on Iran; though Samore believes more regulation leads to further issues. “We intensify sanctions, and then Iran intensifies nuclear activities” (Samore et al.pg.28). Even if America proposed stricter regulations it would have no support from the members of the U.N. In the end this deal is not perfect, but it delays any threat of nuclear annihilation till the cure is …show more content…
Russia, by the time a deal was presented, already stood behind a nuclear arsenal; which boosted their leverage. Unlike Russia, Iran stands only behind the technology to create a nuclear arsenal. This is a leverage that only has potential to increase over the time frame that it takes for a nuclear weapon to craft. Supports believe that this deal is crucial; buying time from Iran to further use on discovering an alternative way of fighting a nuclear threat. However, with this deal Iran grows economically; which may pose the possibility that they may leave this deal stronger than ever. In the end, no one wants to see the end and compromises are necessary for another

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decades of American and United Nation efforts have failed to prevent Iran from obtaining their own nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities. The most recent reports from multiple national and international sources have confirmed that Iran has successfully tested a nuclear warhead north of Namakzar-e Shahdad . A nuclear armed Iran poses a grave threat to the safety of Americans and the world. Announcements by Iran’s Supreme Leader warn against an offensive attack and they have made preemptive military movements and patrols as a show of force. It is in America’s best interest to resolve this conflict with a smart response leveraging our multilateral partnerships but reserving the right to make independent actions when warranted.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a “treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. ”13 Some countries like India, Israel, and Pakistan have not signed the treaty, yet still have nuclear weapons that raise concern. The world has seen the devastation that nuclear weapons can cause from the events of World War II. Knowing that mass destruction can occur at the push of a button strikes fear in the world.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since this weaponry has the ability to increase violent terrorist attacks, it is vital for states to be aware and take caution when dealing with Iran now. Even though already true, it seems risky and terrifying that Iran has the same nuclear power as the United States (CITE pg. 3) The book Hiroshima is a strong influencer when comparing these articles’ facts and opinions because everything was put in perspective in this book. The outcome of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was realistically described, making the event relate to any audience. The TYPEatomic bombs devastating long-term effects on the people of Hiroshima makes the thought of any country with this type of weaponry power seem…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With numerous amounts of detail and foreign affairs in the article, Coll uses this as a means to show his knowledge on the topic while still persuading the modest tone. Coll’s details on Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other countries about nuclear affairs is meant to educate the reader by giving him the knowledgeable insight on the topic being discussed in places other than the United States. Coll says things like, “more dangerous competition is gaining momentum in the Middle East,” and “ it may be impossible to prevent nuclear gridlock in the Middle East.” These statements show the scale of nuclear affairs and maximizes the importance of the matter. By using international affairs and showing the danger and problems in other places of the across the world, Coll hopes to show that the danger occurring in other places could eventually be occurring here if nothing is done to solve it.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, the treaty did not pass the United State’s senate even though it was signed by 71 nations’ leaders including Bill Clinton. Although so many of these countries signed the treaty, not all of them withstood their promises. Iran has started to discuss possibly severing their ties to The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Donald Trump has brought this to the table by disparaging Iran’s willingness to participate in nuclear affairs. Although Iran is considering starting their testings once again, neither country wants to be the first to break away from the agreement(Washington…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INARA Case Study

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is an intention in the administration and Congress to put pressure on Europe to get some concessions for supporting sanctions on Iran non-nuclear issues in exchange of maintaining JCPOA. Those advocate of such plan indirectly try to push Europe to rethink about their willingness to increase commercial cooperation with…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are many critics that oppose President Obama’s Iran Deal, I personally support it. The deal offers a just compromise to both the United States and Iran by obstructing “Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons in exchange for relief from crippling economic sanctions” (The Week). Some disputants of the deal claim that Iran could still easily get their hands on nuclear weapons, but Aaron Stein, a nuclear nonproliferation expert, says that “the likelihood of [Iran] getting caught [if they ‘cheat’] is near 100 percent” (The Week). The deal has no true consequences other than the narrow risk that Iran will violate it. The former president of UANI (United Against Nuclear Iran), Gary Samore, went to the extent of saying: “If I knew…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, the Treaty committed states which possession of weapons, do not transfer any nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices directly, or indirectly, to any party such weapons or devices. The treaty also obliged those states not to help, encourage or induce any state that does not possess nuclear weapons to manufacture or acquire such weapons or explosive devices. The treaty indicated clearly the right of all states parties in the research, development, production, and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes within the safeguards system, without disrupting for this use, and asserted the right of States parties to the exchange of scientific and technological information for the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Treaty obliged all States in a position to contribute individually or with others, or within international organizations in achieving this goal. The treaty furthermore stipulated in Article (3) that all states do not offer any equipment or specially designed or intended for the manufacture or production of fissile material tools to any non-nuclear…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past two decades, we’ve seen India and Pakistan take their rivalries to a new level with the introduction of smaller, precision devices called tactical nukes (Asia Society). From their initial test dates, the US and the Soviets the world’s biggest rivals(Atomic Archive). Today, Russia is attempting to continue production and research of nukes while our weapons program languishes. Even countries such as North Korea signed documents promising that they won’t produce nuclear material or weapons,(Arms Control Association) but that hasn’t stopped them in the slightest. With the recent developments of Iran’s nuclear program, what will happen? Will they dismantle their equipment or continue researching weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reagan had said to many that it was “ the saddest day of my presidency and probably the most saddest day of my entire life.” (“Cannon, 2008”) It was not only a sad day for him, but a sad day for all. Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan both came to an agreement later on and signed a treaty called, Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty in December 1987, at the Washington Summit. This treaty will “ eliminate an entire class of intermediate-range nuclear missiles.”…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While deterrent strategies have proven successful, especially during the Cold War, the recent emergence of international terrorist organizations reveals a major flaw of the deterrence theory. It cannot be assumed that terrorists will worry about the negative consequences they will suffer if they bomb another country with nuclear weapons; on the contrary, it is not unsafe to assume that they will readily bomb other countries to instigate terror in people. Therefore, it is irrefutable that extreme measures need to be taken to prevent terrorist organizations laying hands on these weapons. The proliferation of nuclear technology or weapons to countries with high terrorist activity is thus highly risky. If proliferation to Iran is successful, “the likelihood that…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iran Nuclear Program Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iran’s nuclear program was not always seen as a controversial aspect of Iran’s domestic policy. As a matter of fact, the origins of the Iranian program began in the 1950’s with the support of the United States. Research and development of a nuclear program began once Tehran joined Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace initiative and signed treaty No.4898. On December 8, 1953 during the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly the Atoms for Peace Program was launched by Eisenhower. International dynamics set by the Cold War provided an incentive for American scientists to “allow all peoples of all nations to see that…the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Iran Culture

    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Allegations of Iran sponsoring terrorism caused the U.S. to enforce extensive trade sanctions on the country. Along with the previously mentioned allegations, Iran’s nuclear programs made the country a target of more trade sanctions. Iran has received international objections over its nuclear program. Iran, however, stands strong that the nuclear program is peaceful in nature and will not discontinue enriching uranium (Iran in perspective,…

    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays