The Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline

Great Essays
The Dakota access pipeline is an affliction to everyone who has a sense of compassion and understanding, especially to indigenous people who are being taxed with decisions and demands from careless people who conceal their true intentions with false facts and reasonings,when all they care about is the green in promising. Recently the $3.8 billion project has become one of America's most followed up protest, for it keeps gaining many people's attention with every protest and support. There are hundreds of people every day at the construction site, and protests are held in others states like Chicago, New York, and Washington. Native Americans and their supporters have been protesting since July 2014, when they first learned about the protest, and since then their cries for help have had minimum effect on the process of the pipeline. Everyone will have a time in their life when they have to be as tenacious as they can be to stand up for their rights and beliefs. …show more content…
The Dakota Access Pipeline is known for its worth and that a source of motivation for Energy Transfer Partners CEO Kelcy Warren. And in return Native Americans have thousands of supporters behind their backs who know and understand their pain, and are willing to make the pipelines construction area their second home, just to ensure that their peaceful protest is acknowledged. “Things are changing and it's because people are letting go of a lot of pain and suffering that has existed for so many years, and we cannot it's our civic and civil responsibility especially me as a non-native to recognize what my ancestors did to native Americans in this country and what I refuse to let continue to happen to native Americans in this country.” (Shailene

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Recently, they have proposed an additional pipeline called the Keystone XL which has not been installed yet. The installation of the Keystone XL pipeline should be disapproved by the United States Government for it will bring both environmental and economic disadvantages, leaving our nation vulnerable Our country’s dependence on gasoline has significantly increased as a result of the increase in…

    • 2082 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many Americans today that believe Keystone XL Pipeline is a great idea, because there will be more job opportunities, which will also boost the economy, in the long run the oil will be less expensive, also it will be energy efficient. Nevertheless, there is the opposite side who disagrees with this idea. Many people consider the Keystone XL Pipeline a terrible idea because there will be less job openings in the long run, also it will be harmful to the economy and environment. Such is the cost of destruction, contamination, air pollution and displacing the Native American’s. Oil Pipelines have been here for a long time.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Picture this: you wake up one morning thinking it’s just going to be a normal day, but then, everything changes. Generals start invading your home and drag you off your front porch and tell you that you can’t live on this land anymore; that it is now for other people to use and have. You can’t grab anything to bring with you. All you have are the clothes and shoes that you have on, nothing more. Think about that.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline has received a lot of attention in the media for the past several months and once again constitute a polemic topic in our nation. It is hard for the U.S. government to understand the value and to even know which places are sacred for Native Americans. However, I believe by now U.S government should better understand their religion and beliefs. I mean they acknowledge that it’s a consistent problem they face, As legal scholar Stephen Pevar tells us, in the article named“Native American Relgiion and Dakota Access Pipeline Crisis: “There is no federal statute that expressly protects Indian sacred sites…. in fact, the federal government knowingly desecrates sites.”…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Envision a world where you are forced away from your homeland by people you don’t even know, then to be put onto a different land that you can’t even live on. Well, this was reality for the Native Americans in Western Washington. In 1887, The Dawes Act was conceived from a congressman, Henry Dawes. The Dawes Act purpose was to give each head of a Native American family an allotment of land which they would farm and learn how to live a “civilized” life on. The Dawes Act was not an honest attempt to save Native Americans because the land they were forced on was not useful, the Dawes Act was not explained to the Native Americans and it did not respect the Native American culture.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the articles, the authors highlight important notions such as “sovereignty,” “recognition,” “separateness,” “domestic dependent nations,” “dominate the physical space,” “reform the minds,” and “absorb the economic”. The authors argue that the legal and juridical sovereignty of American Indian provides them with the right to maintain and protect their traditional distinct political and cultural communities. In this pretext, to deal with the growing environmental problems at an alarming level, the tribal governments have inherent and statutory right to set their own environmental standards to meet the emerging environmental challenges. These challenges are serious threats to their socio-cultural, economic, politicolegal, spatial, and temporal…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winona LaDuke, a Native American activist, stated, “In the end, there is no absence of irony: the integrity of what is sacred to Native Americans will be determined by the [U.S] government that has been responsible for doing everything in its power to destroy Native American cultures” (cite). This paper argues that the Dakota Access Pipeline is represented in the media as government intrusion and exploitation of Native Americans through environmental racism. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is 1,172 miles long and made to carry oil from North Dakota to southern Illinois; however, this project is controversial, sparking protests, due to it crossing the drinking water source of the Standing Rock Sioux, a Native American tribe. The first news…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the Standing Sioux Rock Tribe is protesting the Dakota Access oil pipeline which is supposed to span 1,100 miles across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa. In this case the protestors are also worried about contamination of their sacred water…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Native American Mascot Controversy Since the 1960s, the Native American mascot controversy has been a prominent debate. To many indigenous communities, the usage of their cultural depictions in high school, college, or at professional level, some sports teams’ choice of mascots are offensive. Others disagree, noting that it stands as a symbol of pride for their establishment and insist they have the right to keep it that way. The National Collegiate Athletic Association-the group who regulates college sports-is still determining whether or not certain usages are appropriate and banning those who are not.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As of late, United States President Donald Trump has reinstated the construction of the pipeline through executive action, despite months of protests in 2016. TALK A LITTLE ABOUT THE PROTESTS AND WHY IT WAS HALTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. The Standing Rock reservation was the focal point of the controversy, as a section of the pipeline was to unlawfully cross this land. However, since it has been approved via executive action, the route for the pipeline has been altered to exclude the Standing Rock reservation (Dakota Access).…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Let me be a free man. Free to travel. Free to stop. Free to work. Free to think and talk and act for myself” - Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce Tribe Johnson v. McIntosh.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Amnesty International they are asking the DOJ to investigate the policing practices at the site, as of November 15th 2016. This is the right of the Indigenous people, the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, to protect their land and the earth, they believe that this pipeline will pollute their land and water supply; it also crosses their sacred burial…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays