The Calvinist-Arminian Debate

Better Essays
There are many controversies regarding the theology in the bible, and different groups and cultures view them and use them as they believe is the correct way. Since we have no time machines or original transcripts, we can only use the text itself to derive clues as to what the author meant. One of the longer standing controversies is the Calvinist-Arminian debate which arose in the 16th century. The debate which argues about the nature of God and whether he decides the future of every individual or if He has given humanity the ability to choose what path they take in life. Calvinists believe that God has predestined each human being already to their final destination and no matter what that person ultimately has done, he or she has a destination. …show more content…
The main or general idea of Arminianism is the notion of free will. The Arminian side claims that humanity was affect by the fall of man, but that it has not been left completely helpless spiritually. They believe that God has given each individual the ability to repent wholeheartedly and also the ability to believe in him. God has given every human being the ability to have free and choose their own destiny. Arminianism would claim that humanity is not a slave to sin but it also has an opportunity and choice to claim God’s grace or reject it. Salvation is a two-way street in which man has just an important role as God. Some would cite Joshua 24:15 which states “And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” Another logical argument made is that very fact that a human can sin implies free will. The other alternative would be that God is creator of sin and brings forth sin. Another set of verses which is cited is Ezekiel 18:23-32, in which God is pleading sinners to repent. Much of the Old testament is God pleading people to choose Him over the dark desires of their hearts and to come to him. Solomon writes in Proverbs 1:24 “I called and you refused, I stretched out my hand and no one paid …show more content…
Arminianism states that Holy spirit calls all those who hear the gospel but each person is able to fully reject the call. Verses that are cited are Luke 7:30 and Mathew 23:37 in which both verses show how someone is unwilling to follow the call of the Spirit and instead decide to follow their own path. They also often cite the prayer which Jesus prayed. If one recalls He claims “may your will be done on Earth as it is in heaven.” The claim “If God’s will cannot be resisted then there wouldn’t be a reason for Jesus to be praying this.” Is made. Solomon writes in Proverbs 1:24 “I called and you refused, I stretched out my hand and no one paid attention.” Many prophets in the Old Testament talks about all the judgment and disaster that is to come if God’s people reject him and turn from him. One final point Arminians make is commenting about Matthew 19:24. Arminians argue if grace is irresistible then is Jesus saying it is harder for God to save a rich man than poor man? They claim that the statement that Calvinists make would limit

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Those who read the book of Genesis can see how the Lord makes it obvious that man and God are divided due to man’s sin. From the beginning of the Bible it is clear that God intends for someone to save us from sin and our own brokenness. (Gen. 3:15)3. Since the Old Testament states the problem that man has and cannot solve on his own, the New Testament shares the one who can relieve man of his wickedness and bear his sins. The Old Testament made it clear that man is unable to save himself by showing the increase of sin in exodus that the Lord eventually needed to wash out.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He aims to test Adam and Eve’s strength by allowing Satan to inflict his deception on them. Adam and Eve both fail the test and that saddens God, but it also shows that the couple were not loyal to him. Biblical writers support this idea by saying, “genuine love cannot exist unless freely given through free choice to accept God’s love or to reject it,” (McDowell) and thus God allows evil to exist and enter Edan. Milton finally allows readers to understand his purpose for writing Paradise Lost, and his passion for it. Milton had written Paradise Lost to justify the ways of God to men, and did so poorly.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is important to know that hate is the opposite of agape, which is a Greek term for love. Although hate is a big term to use towards people it could be interpreted as to leave everything that is holding you back from Heaven and the Kingdom of God. This is because he asking people to hate those who give them comfort, which represents everything that people know and love. Moreover, Jesus says people who do not leave everything and carry the cross “cannot be my disciple”(Luke 14:27c) this phrase is repeated twice and is a major theme in this speech. This is because Jesus wants people to hate their family and leave everything behind to become to disciples of…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When they heard about it, the Pharisees said that that the only way he did that was because he was the prince of demon. Jesus refutes this claim and goes on to speak about how those who speak against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. The Holy Spirit is there to live in us and guide us as we live and experience the world but also have faith towards God and His calling for us and these points in Matthew continue to prove that point.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Asaph's Imprecatory Prayer

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparatively, in Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Meditations on Psalms, Dietrich timidly speaks out about the imprecatory prayers saying, “In our Psalm, that terrible prayer that begins, which we dread, which we repeat only with trembling and deep inner resistance’ when we read it.” Here Bonhoeffer is resisting, and teaching to resist reading parts of the Holy Scripture that God revealed. The Word of God takes a stand on such utterances, “Therefore, whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves” (Romans 13:2 NKJV). Moreover, this scripture says God is the ultimate and sovereign ruler of all and that includes His word as well. It is also written, “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father’s who sent Me” (John 14:24 NKJV). Jesus is saying that the word is from God, and if we Love him we should guard his word, just as the authors of the prayers…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many would feel that it seem that God is tyrannical over humanity in that he is aware of the inevitable sin of his own creation and henceforth condemns some based on their abscence of faith, the arbitrary baseline by which someone needs for salvation. From the scripture that Calvin himself includes in the text, God seems to be a puppet-master when “God has mercy upon whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.” (Romans 9:18, Institutes…

    • 2012 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “To preach Christ means to feed the soul, make it righteous, set it free, and save it, provided the preaching is believed” (Lull Russell 405). Here Luther says that no robe can save their soul, just attending church will not bring you righteousness, not amount of prayer can save you from damnation that only those who have faith in the word of God can be saved. Although these priests, and laity may preach the word of God to others they must not only speak of the gospel to be saved but they must believe it. He states that no amount of praying, sacred duties, or fasting could lead to Christian righteousness or freedom as these are good works that any hypocrite could perform (Lull Russell 405). Anyone can pray to God or fast but only faith in the word of God will grant the sinner true freedom and righteousness, no good works.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In disagreement, it is clear that Anselm is a new Christian because this is what modern Christian's struggle with or complain how they cannot see God so why do they need to seek someone they cannot see with their whole heart. The strength of his argument is Anselm has a point that everybody comes across at one end in their lives that one cannot see God and it is up to this person to put their faith in God. God does want his creation that is us to have a choice in his existence, and he wants us whom he has created to have faith in its presence. For example, in opinion, in Genesis, God knew ahead of time that Adam and Eve were going to eat of that tree that they were not supposed to eat. This reason was that God wants us to have a choice to believe in his existence and he wants us to choose not to sin.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquinas Argument

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    God, in this manner can regain his qualities of completely good and able to send people to an eternal punishment of they choose. He allows the people to not choose that and instead choose his way, which is grace and justification from the crimes that they committed against him. It joins with thee free will argument saying that it is the choice of the sinner to choose repentance or death. If God is goodness then the opposite has to be death. A crime committed against goodness is the absence of goodness.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Erasmus said “By free choice in this place we mean a power of the human will by which a man can apply himself to things which lead to eternal salvation,or turn away from them. (Erasmus pg 47), this quote shows how vastly different the two schools of thought are. John Calvin believes that humans for 1 don’t have any free will and number 2 can’t ever get saved if they aren’t already chosen as part of the elect to be saved.Where on the other hand Erasmus is taking the catholic view and saying not only do Christians have free will but they also can choose whether or not they want to live a Godly life so they have a chance of Salvation. Another major point that makes the two theologians differ is the ideas of TULIP.If people are to look at TULIP if you sum up a lot of them it is just pointing out the fact that humans don’t have free will. T- Humans have no free will because they are forever sinful, U/L/I- Humans can’t decide if they are saved or not, if they’re not saved they’re not saved,P-Even if a believer turns from God they will get into heaven, but when a believer feels they are one of the saved ones it makes them want to live a Godly life.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays