The Pros And Cons Of The Bomb

Decent Essays
The Bomb was used to bring World War II to a quick end. This almost goes hand-in-hand with saving lives. The Japanese surrender came just eight days after the bombing of Hiroshima and five days after the bombing of Nagasaki. United States military officials had previously stated that they wanted to end the war in the Pacific no more than a year after Germany surrendered. The reason behind this is that they felt there was only so much that could asked of soldiers and the American public before support and motivation dwindled (Barnes, “Arguments Supporting The Bomb”). The truth is, back in the United States, the American public and the top leaders were growing tired of the war. The nation’s leaders could no longer justify prolonging a war that …show more content…
Japan either surrendered or the United States was going to seek total destruction. The purpose of the Potsdam Declaration was to “spare the Japanese people from utter destruction” according to a press release by Truman on August 6, 1945. Japan refused. The U.S. was not going to accept terrorist threats and barbaric actions anymore. In war, one typically does not want their enemy to know their plans. However, the United States clearly laid out their goal to Japan. They were going to win the war. Japan would either surrender or die. Either way, the war would come to an end. Again, this factors in to the number of lives saved, but it also tells about the warnings Japan’s leaders were given. Japan chose to ignore those warnings and chose the alternative; that was destruction.
The decision to drop the bomb was made by a committee of Truman’s cabinet members and other officials. As Commander-in-Chief, the final decision ultimately rested on President Truman. After the bombings, Truman knew the seriousness that came along with using a weapon like this. He said to Senator Richard B. Russell, Jr. on August 9, 1945: “My object is to save as many American lives as possible but I also have a human feeling for the women and children of Japan” (McCullough 458). This, undoubtedly, was a difficult decision for Truman and everyone involved in the
…show more content…
The evidence is clear. Dropping the atomic bombs on Japan simply saved the lives of millions of American and Japanese people and successfully brought a quick end to World War II. If Truman and his administration had not made this decision, the war could have dragged on for many more months, which would have caused numerous more fatalities on both sides. Based on the number of lives saved alone, President Truman was justified in his decision to use the atomic bomb. However, Truman went beyond just saving lives. He sought to quickly end the war in order to ensure victory for the United States and to bring exhausted soldiers home after years of fighting. Truman also gave a warning of what would happen if Japan did not surrender. This is something one does not typically do during wartime. After those warnings were ignored, then President Truman decided to use the bomb. The decision to use atomic warfare was a hard, but ultimately justifiable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial decisions in American history was Harry S. Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and killed between 70,000 and 80,000 Japanese people. After three days, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and killed 70,000 people immediately. Radiation from the bombs led to extensive damage as well. The Japanese then chose to surrender on September 2 which marked the end of the great war.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan’s economy was down and running out of resources, but by the U.S. dropping the bombs it ended the war and allowed Japan to rebuild its country. The atomic bomb did cause fatalities, but it saved more lives that if the war was to be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Truman Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb? President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary, harsh, and had multiple negative consequences. Truman didn’t allow enough time to study the full effects of the bomb, and his risqué decision resulted in a horrific number of deaths, as well as long-lasting and unforeseen effects both for Japan as well as the rest of the world. Truman was attempting not to bring an end to conflict, but he did not consider that dropping the bomb might be dangerous for the long term security of our world.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Japanese already established their willingness to fight tooth and nail for Japan and the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa suggesting a substantial amount of loss of life and property for an invasion of Japan homeland. The atomic bombs were possibly the only alterative to what an invasion would hold, as author Bernstein defines with America’s potential Invasion of Japan on the horizon, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, details an estimation of over 250,000 American casualties and up to a million men for an invasion of Japan (Bernstein, 550). With America’s estimations and the expected outcomes of invasion of Japan, suggesting a bloodbath “an all-out fight to the death” between the Japanese population and American soldiers, The atomic bombs had to be dropped, as not dropping the atomic bombs the invasion of Japan would have most likely preceded instead, thus prolonging the war, causing substantial amounts of casualties and costing a great amount of funds and resources to overtsee the operation. The atomic bombs provided an alternative to risking anymore American lives. Similarly, by July 1945, the Japanese military continued refuse surrender.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this time, the USSR declared war on Japan and began invading some cities. Although many members of Japan’s council wanted to accept the Potsdam treaty, there was no majority; therefore, Japan still did not surrender. President Truman realized that another bomb would have to be dropped soon so that Japan would not have time to recover from Hiroshima. He also wanted to strike quickly so that Japan would assume that America owned a large amount of nuclear weapons, when in reality, America only had two. Fat Man was the name given to the second atomic bomb which was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, a mere three days after the first bomb was dropped.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bomb itself showed the potential of America's scientific and technological advancement due to the incredible amount of damage and lives it took in one explosion. Despite this, the bomb could actually save lives because of how fast it took them. A single blast can take over 80,000 lives and annihilate about 10 square miles of land. With this power, it would stop Japan from sending in more soldiers again us and pretty much kill themselves about it, and less American soldiers would be wounded or killed by fighting. America could quickly wipe out Japan without so much as to send a single soldier, compared to how slow and grueling constant air raids would be despite the fact they took more lives.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brian Gutierrez J. Samuel Walker, Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004). In Prompt and Utter Destruction by J. Samuel Walker, there is a lot to be said when talking about the use of atomic bombs. Throughout the book, Walker breaks down the choice made by President Harry S. Truman and analyzes some of the myths that are brought up when talking about the end of World War II. The thesis to Prompt and Utter Destruction was not as straight forward as it was in Manliness and Civilization.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decades after the atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans still question whether it was a good idea to drop them. One of the reasons the bombs should have been dropped is the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The United States and Japan were at peace until Japan bombed a military base in Hawaii and afterward, president Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. In his well-known infamy speech, FDR stated, “I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” America and its people saw the bombing as an act of war and in return, they declared war.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays