The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
Has war ever been the most unnecessary way of winning a competition? Seems like one of the worst ways to get things under control. Why do we need dead bodies lying across the land for no particular reason? That is why the atomic bomb should be talked about. An atomic bomb is one of the most destructive ways of ending all problems. The atomic bomb that was struck at Hiroshima should have never happened. Harry Truman, President at the time, planned the bombing of Hiroshima and wanted to end war. Truman made the wrong decision to drop the bomb because it was too powerful, deadly, and Unnecessary.
In order to understand Truman’s decision, one must understand That Japan started the war with the United States. On December 7, 1941, Japan bombs
…show more content…
The Atomic Bomb was hotter than the surface of the sun. For example, the bomb can get as hot as 7200, twice the melting point of steel (Wells ,24 Hours After ). This was a bad decision do to the fact that it burned everything in its path. Buildings and other structures were demolished. 67% of structures were destroyed (Wells, 24 Hours After). That means 33% of buildings were still standing, but all of them were destroyed in some way. The fires increased rapidly causing more damage. In fact, funnels of fire tore through the area making it hard to walk around the city (Hersey, 58). This caused the fires to leap up, and they spread very quickly. It was hard to see through the blazing smoke. For instance, clouded air was giving off a thick, dreadful miasma (Hersey, 33). This made it hard to breath after the smoke came down from above the whole city, and it caused the sunlight to disappear. In that case, Truman made the wrong decision to drop the bomb because it was too …show more content…
These innocent people were dying quickly. Like 70,000 died when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima (Wells, 24 Hours After). This killed too many civilians. Most civilians had health problems. To clarify everybody was getting sick (Hersey, 54). It was hard to help the civilians because doctors and nurses were badly hurt and even dead. Out of 1789 nurses, 1654 were dead or badly hurt to work. Out of 150 doctors, 65 were dead and the rest were wounded. The war didn’t stop in Hiroshima. In this case, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, 40,000 died instantly (Wells, 24 Hours After). Thats now a total of around 100,000 deaths in the city from just 2 bombs. There were many more civilians than military. Indeed, 85% of the population were civilians in Hiroshima (Wells, 24 Hours After). That leaves 15% left in the city over a small portion of the military in the city which was pointless to kill. Therefore, the effect on innocent people was another reason why Truman made the wrong decision to drop the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Atomic bombs and President Truman’s decision to use them will always be up for debate. From the political standpoint it was the right thing to do for the survival of America’s troops and America. Hindsight is 20/20 and looking back on what has happened in the past and deciding whether it was right or wrong is impossible. President Truman was faced with a tough decision, end the war quickly with less loss of American life or face an invasion of Japan that could have killed a million US troops.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the war still going on, Truman gave Japan one final warning, which Japan ignored. Then on August 6, the United States dropped the weapon on Hiroshima. On August 9, the city of Nagasaki was hit. One day later Japan surrendered. President Truman made the right decision to use the nuclear bomb on Japan.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand once the bomb was dropped one of the unjustifiable arguments against the bomb was the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ferrell, Truman had two main reasons for dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. First of all, there was an emotional reason that had to do with Japan’s surprise bombing of Pearl Harbor (Ferrell 209). After the bombings in Japan Truman responded to a letter asking why he had done it with stating, “You should do your weeping at Pearl Harbor, where thousands of American boys are underneath waves caused by a Japanese sneak attack while we were at peace with Japan” (211). He mentioned how people, “tend to forget” that at the time of Pearl Harbor, the United States were trying to remain in peace with Japan by organizing a treaty (211). He continues the letter by stating that as a result of the bombing of Pearl Harbor, “Altogether, there were between 3,000 and 6,000 youngsters killed at the time without any declaration of war.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some historians may disagree, saying the two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely necessary and justified. People will say this was the best approach concerning the overall death toll, and how ultimately, it was the sole way to end the war. These points, however, can easily be disproven. The idea of dropping the atom bomb begins when President Harry Truman comes to the conclusion, based on their two most recent previous battles, that sending American troops in to invade Japan would not result well. The estimated total rounded to 1.5 million lives loss, and therefore Truman decided to drop the bomb.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Let us examine some of the arguments for and against the bomb. In estimating the death toll from the attacks, there are several factors that make it difficult to arrive at reliable figures: inadequacies in the records given the confusion of the times, the many victims who died months or years after the bombing as a result of radiation exposure, and not least, the pressure to either exaggerate or minimize the numbers, depending upon political agenda. That said, it is estimated that by December 1945, as many as 140,000 had died in Hiroshima by the bomb and its associated effects. In…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped he first atomic bomb on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. The instant shock wave and scalding temperatures immediately killed around 80,000 civilians and military personnel. Three days later, the U.S. dropped a second atomic bomb on another Japanese…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two days later, the Soviets declared war on Japan. On August 9, 1945, a second Atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki, 40,000 Japanese citizens…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Hiroshima does not look like a bombed city. It looks as if a monster steamroller had passed over it and squashed it out of existence,” (“Burchett”). The atomic bomb’s effects were more destructive and affected more area than any bomb had ever before.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the world today, modern warfare is shaped to fight an enemy that cannot be faced head on. Once man stopped fighting wars hand to hand with guns and swords, he took to the skies to drop bombs and spray bullets. It was only a matter of time before the price was too high for the collateral damage to be worth it. This militaristic milestone was reached by the creation of the atomic bomb in 1945. They decimated the target area, leaving nothing but shadow and ash in its wake.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Millions of lives were at stake across the world, prompting President Truman to make a difficult decision: devastate two cities and kill thousands of innocent people, or risk watching millions more die in horrific…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the atom bomb was invented by the United States the people believed that it would be a savior to the war that was occurring, but fate would have the bomb be a global phenomenon as the world stood in awe of its catastrophic power. Having such a weapon that would most certainly win the war for your country was an amazing thought, and of course many country’s believed that too, which inevitably led to the cold war. What were to follow was a race to develop these bombs many of the world’s leading chemists worked hands on, it also led to many advancements in other fields of science. The invention of the atomic bomb and its use are they justified, they have definitely left their mark on human history and are here to stay. First off, before a nuclear bomb was ever made a man by the name Leo Szilard theorized that if an…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays