The 1850 Compromise Of 1850

Improved Essays
from Mexico which included California, Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona. With the discovery of gold, people rushed to California in large numbers. So large, in fact, that the state was eligible to become a state. Because the state was mostly under the 38th Parallel, it was supposed to be admitted as a slave state, but the people voted that California become known as a free state. It eventually led to the creation of the 1850 Compromise. The Compromise of 1850 was suggested by Henry Clay and it was made to help relieve tensions and come to an agreement between the free states and the slave states. The 1850 Compromise allowed California to be admitted into the country as a free state and abolished slavery in Washington D.C. Unfortunately, …show more content…
Douglas suggested the Kansas-Nebraska Act because he wanted to remove any obstacles to the transcontinental railroad. The act allowed both Kansas and Nebraska to be admitted into the union as either a slave or free state depending on what the citizens voted and is also known as popular sovereignty. It also overturned the Missouri Compromise since the citizens could vote. The act contained thirty-seven sections and was approved on May 30, 1854. This led to problems, however, because people from both slave and free states rushed to vote to decide on the fate of the states. It evolved into conflicts with one another because the two do not get along with one another especially in Kansas. As a result, they fought in an event known as Bleeding Kansas, where both sides started to fight the other in a mini Civil War. After the fighting, Kansas was admitted into the union as a free state. Because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the fights that erupted because of it, tensions between slavery …show more content…
It started when John Emerson, a Missouri slave owner, brought Dred Scott, his slave, into Fort Snelling in Wisconsin Territory, where slavery is considered illegal. In Minnesota, he married another slave that Emerson owned. After Emerson died, Dred Scott sued Emerson’s widow and won in the lower courts but did not win in the Missouri Court and was assigned to John F. A. Sanford. Scott then sued Sanford because Scott believed that since he lived in free states, he should be freed as a slave. In 1856, the trial carried up to the Supreme Court where a decision was made. The Supreme Court said that Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was a slave under Missouri law and slaves are considered property, thus not being able to sue. The decision was that there was nothing in their power that they could do to make people slaves or free. This angered many Northerners where they believed that slavery should be illegal compared to the Southerners, who were pleased because they believed that slavery should be legal. Tensions got worse until the South could not handle it in the most important election in American history.
A famous abolitionist by the name of John Brown made himself known in John Brown’s Raid. John Brown was one of the people who started Bleeding Kansas when he helped initiate a small civil war by murdering five settlers who were thought to be proslavery. In

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With the territorial expansion caused tensions dealing with slavery. There was an issue what state would be a free state or slave state. For example: no one knew what state would be free or not free, so they decided to make an act called the Kansas and Nebraska act. The Kansas Nebraska act simply explained that territories newly or already states would determine if their state would be a slave state or free state, which caused tension because if kansas became a slave state it would ruin the missouri compromise. If other states would be slave states it would ignore the wilmot proviso…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state. The north was extremely offended by this because it violated the the 36’ 30° line, which had been created by the Missouri…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery between the states was an ongoing complication that began to cause conflicts. The conflicts created led acts established by the people that became an important statement for why the Mexican-American War and the Civil War were started. Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was for Texas to give 10 million dollars for the debt to Mexico and the states of Utah, New Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona would get to decide based on popular…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just as there were radical Southerners called “fire-eaters,” who urged secession from the Union, there were also fanatic abolitionists. John Brown in 1859 led an antislavery posse to Harpers Ferry, Virginia; they seized the armory hoping to incite a slave rebellion. He was captured by Colonel Robert E. Lee and looked upon as an antislavery martyr in the North when he was…

    • 1093 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the Compromise of 1850 allowing the possibility of new slave states, it also place legal demands upon northerners to help in recapturing fugitive slaves. When the Mexican war was won it introduced a vast of new territories. With these new territories, came concerns. America’s victory forced Mexico to cede with California to the United States among other states. America’s decision on choosing which states to allow slavery lead to multiple…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These issues had been boiling up until the topic of slavery brought fuel to the fire. In the compromise of 1850, amendments were made to the Fugitive Slave act, which was an agreement made by the northern and southern states, that if a slave escaped to a northern state he or she would be returned to their masters in the south. The Fugitive Slave Act now added that when a fugitive was captured, he or she was no longer was granted a jury trial and instead the decision of whether or not they were free was up to a commissioner. Obviously the commissioner is more likely to return the slave since they would receive more money that way. The “Compromise of 1850” was created by Senator John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay and Daniel Webster. All three men passed away two to three years after the “Compromise of 1850” and no one took a stand to be the voice of reason in the country. Southern economy as it is agricultural became more dependent on slavery while the North more diverse economics and did not rely on slavery. The Kansas bill in 1854 declared that any state out of the Nebraska territory would enter the union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission. The implanted Popular Sovereignty and resulted in destroying the Whigs party, planting irreconcilable divisions in the democrat party, creating two new parties, the Know-Nothings and the…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri compromise, was a bill that was formed to create boundaries that split the United States between the Northern free states (non-slavery), and the Southern slave states. The boundary line for slave states and non-slave states was latitude 36°30′(see map below). At the time the northern states economy was industrial, and the southern states economy was more agricultural. For this reason the southern states relied heavily on the use of slaves to farm the land. In 1819 Alabama joined the union as a slave state. There were a total of 22 states after Alabama joined the union (11 slave states and 11 free states). In 1820 Maine came into the union as a free state. After Maine became a state the number of slave and free states were uneven and if Missouri would have joined the union as a free state the house…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To begin with, after the Mexican Secession, California had written a constitution of its own, which banned slavery, and asked Congress for admission as a free state- beforehand, there was equal balance of power in the senate. Sooner rather than later, radical southerners had spoken of secession and the question of a compromise had arisen, which Henry Clay and Douglas favored. Eventually the Compromise of 1850 had been instituted. The Compromise had admitted California as a free state, set up Utah and New Mexico as territories, the nation’s capital banned the slave trade in D.C, and the New Fugitive Slave Law was enacted in the south (Doc A). President Fillmore had believed it to be the end of sectional division but the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had turned the North as a hunting ground for fugitive slaves and because slaves could not testify, they were denied a jury trial (doc C). Correspondingly, the issue of slaves in the Constitution had appeared again in the Dred Scott case. Dred Scott was a man who had sued for his freedom and had went all the way to the supreme court. However, Congress could not make laws regarding slavery in the territories, thereby making the Missouri Compromise legal and slavery legal throughout the nation. Also, because of the Dred Scott case, slaves were deemed unable to sue. Coupled with this, underground railroads were built and those who…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for them whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South. (Doc 5) When Kansas was being admitted as a state, popular sovereignty was being enforced, and many people were being encouraged to vote Free through the use of an advertisement. (Doc 7) Kansas was going to be admitted as a free state, but border ruffians from the South crossed the border into Kansas and voted so that it would become a slave state. With Kansas being admitted as a slave state, and a re-vote being denied by the President at the time, there was opposition within the state that led to Bleeding Kansas. Bleeding Kansas was a conflict between the Pro-Slavery people and the Anti-Slavery people.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1850s, because many committee chairmanships and leadership positions were held by southerners, they were able to block discussions of slavery at the national and state level, ultimately giving them power and control over Congress, the Supreme Court, and the government. The United States’ victory in the Mexican War added half a million square miles to the United States, more than a third of its prewar territory. There was a question over whether or not the newly acquired property of California would be a free or a slave state. Congress finally reached agreed to the Compromise of 1850, admitting California as a free state but also gave the South a much stronger Fugitive Slave Act. The Changes made to the Fugitive Slave Act, the Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states. Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War. (kincaid’s class…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to solve tensions between the North and the South over the expansion of slavery, specifically into Texas, which was a territory obtained by the United States in the Mexican…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays