Gun control is hardly a settled issue in American politics. One side maintains that any infringement on the right to bear arms cannot be tolerated, whereas other argue that some restrictions may be appropriate in order to ensure a safer society. This sample argumentative essay argues in favor for stricter gun control laws.
The problem of loose gun laws in America
Gun control is a highly debated issue in America that is currently making headlines today. Those in favor of gun control argue that stricter laws are needed to make it harder for criminals, terrorists, and the mentally ill to obtain weapons.
On the other hand, opponents of strict gun control regulations claim that the Second Amendment gives Americans the right to have guns to protect themselves. As a result, this debate focuses on who should be allowed to own guns and which rights gun owners should have when they have a legal weapon in their …show more content…
Jim Denison argued that criminals can still gain access to guns through the black market, and mentally ill individuals can obtain a firearm from another person, such as a relative.
Although it is agreed that criminals, mentally ill people, and terrorists can obtain a firearm through the black market, the fact is that many criminals run the black market. Therefore, by making background checks mandatory, we can try to eliminate a black market for firearms and prevent criminals from owning and selling guns.
Additionally, opponents argue that sensible gun control regulations are not needed to reduce the number of murders in the United States since homicides are already decreasing in our country.
Sherry Murphy, Jiaquan Xu, and Kenneth Kochanek explained that “homicides have dropped as one of the leading causes of death for the first time since
The problem of loose gun laws in America
Gun control is a highly debated issue in America that is currently making headlines today. Those in favor of gun control argue that stricter laws are needed to make it harder for criminals, terrorists, and the mentally ill to obtain weapons.
On the other hand, opponents of strict gun control regulations claim that the Second Amendment gives Americans the right to have guns to protect themselves. As a result, this debate focuses on who should be allowed to own guns and which rights gun owners should have when they have a legal weapon in their …show more content…
Jim Denison argued that criminals can still gain access to guns through the black market, and mentally ill individuals can obtain a firearm from another person, such as a relative.
Although it is agreed that criminals, mentally ill people, and terrorists can obtain a firearm through the black market, the fact is that many criminals run the black market. Therefore, by making background checks mandatory, we can try to eliminate a black market for firearms and prevent criminals from owning and selling guns.
Additionally, opponents argue that sensible gun control regulations are not needed to reduce the number of murders in the United States since homicides are already decreasing in our country.
Sherry Murphy, Jiaquan Xu, and Kenneth Kochanek explained that “homicides have dropped as one of the leading causes of death for the first time since