The Pros And Cons Of Space Travel In Space

Good Essays
Self-driving cars, face-scanning phones, virtual reality; everyone’s heard it all, and soon enough, science will be able to create absolutely everything right in front of people’s fingertips. Who knows, maybe one day everyone will be able to float around in space, but the reason might not be the reason people would think. All these dangerously smart inventions are practically destroying Earth’s atmosphere, and everyone will need another place to go. The Earth’s atmosphere is being destroyed little by little, but afterward, Earth won't be an option to stay. Humanity won’t be able to travel through space because space travel is not only down-right crazy, but it’s a total waste of money and a risk to mankind and outer space, and acknowledging …show more content…
Well, in this case, space travel is way worse. So despite the fact that space travel is a complete waste of money, it’s also absolutely way too much. Even though paying to save lives is basically the point and that it’s not all the money in the world, just think of it like this. To get every human on the planet to a different planet would cost probably millions; or even billions of dollars. Plus, where’s the money even going? If we are paying to go to a different planet, what would the money be used for? To create all the spaceships, gear, and space suits is just way too much money, and using money from taxes doesn’t make the situation any better. Money doesn’t grow off trees, so where are we supposed to get all of it, anyway? Space travel not only will cost a lot of money, but some people struggle to earn money, so it would be incredibly unfair to take the money off of people’s taxes. According to the text “Future of Space Exploration Could See Humans on Mars, Alien Planets” by Nola Taylor Redd, she explains how some people object using …show more content…
We don’t know very much about our Earth alone, so moving to another planet doesn’t make a very large difference, and the pollution we could make by spaceships and other junk in space could really interfere with the gases in the air. Not only that but just like on Earth, we could create so much fossil fuel to the point where everything would just happen all over again. Keith Wagstaff, the author of “Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Future of U.S. Space Exploration After Curiosity” explains some of the risks of space travel by stating “It’s not possible because a space frontier is expensive, it has unknown risks, and it has unquantified risks. Historically, governments have done this. They have drawn the maps, they have found where the trade winds are, they have invented the new tools to go where no one has gone before.” (Wagstaff). I think that relating to what Wagstaff said, some of the risks include not being aware of our surroundings, which is a pretty big threat to us. If we were to use space travel, it would be very unsafe, because we don’t have a large understanding of what has gotten into the air from other solar systems, ours, or even solar systems 27 million light-years away. So in reality, if we were to travel in space we would be risking not only our lives but possibly the other lives in outer

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Although, Mars One may find the technology needed to build a bigger rocket, they will need more; to build another one for the people sent to Mars after the first group. This also proves that Mars One will need a better landing method because they want to land a huge rover onto the red planet, but they have not yet achieved that with one of the (huge) size they have in mind. Not only does Mars One need more technology to build bigger rockets and get a better landing method, it takes a lot of money; and Mars One already doesn’t have enough money. Mars One is not doing too well in this situation.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Space exploration is a vital part to how the world is today. People believe that it is just a waste of money, but in truth it could save the entire human race in the future. Without space exploration, we will overpopulate the earth. The earth does not have enough space for the rate of people being born. Also with overpopulation, means that we will also use up all of our natural resources.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Space Debate Whether or not America should be funding space exploration, namely the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), does not really get debated much. However, when this subject is brought into question people tend to take a strict stance on one side or the other. It is easy to dismiss the entire objective of putting man in space as a waste of time and resources, but that could not be further from the truth. Space exploration stimulates technological innovation and provides a clear path for economic growth. Defunding NASA would be counter productive and only slow America's overall long-term economic progress; if anything NASA's budget should be increased rather than decreased.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is essential that the country gives more money towards the space exploration industry because without these corporations, the economy would prove to be extremely unstable, there would be no have advancing technology, and there would always be a delay on interstellar projects. As of right now, NASA is trying to reach new goals of expanding human life and attempting to keep earthlings around as long as possible. As being the most intelligent life forms in the galaxy, it is a moral obligation for mankind to fulfill the potential as a species, and push the knowledge boundary of science and space as far as possible. This science boundary is always devolving, however at a leisurely rate. This can be blamed on a paucity of revenue flow.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Space exploration is beyond our wildest dreams. Overcrowding stars, planets and mysteries in the open universe is unapparent and discovering everything that forms our world would be nearly impossible. To some people space exploration allows us to solve the wonders and understand a broader view of our universe we live in today. All matters in the universe, illuminating, were all merged together as one singularity - undergoing a rapid expansion to become a universe we stand on today. A highly debated topic which attracts mankind from star gazers to astrophysicists, is their faults in space explorations.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another reason why going to mars is a bad idea is because of the budget that it cost to go to mars and if we fail then it is waste of money. According to the article From packing to Mars Mary roach says that a manned mission to mars would cost 3 billion $. In my opinion I believe that spending 3 billion $ is a lot of money to go a just one planet I believe that is a waste of money. My theory about going to mars is bad idea and a waste of money. That is what I think about the budget and if going to Mars is a good idea which is not and it's a waste of…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    NASA Pros And Cons

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    DeGroot (2012) wrote an article for Galegroup, in which he asked the question so what in response to China on path to put a man on Mars (DeGroot, 2012, p.1). He claims “The time has come to pull the plug on meaningless gestures in space”, stating that the missions are tremendously expensive (DeGroot, 2012, p.1). The argument is trying to make the point that NASA has no real benefit for what it does. This is a very common counter-argument that is presented daily. However, what these people fail to consider are the economic and inspirational benefits NASA provides that I have explained above.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I mean there are black holes, asteroids, solar flairs, and so many more, but what can we do about them? If we are in space we have no protection, for instant, the moon does not have an ozone layer, so comets and asteroids will hit it full force. They will continue making these statements that going to space now is the better solution, but with the cost to do what most of them want to do it will still be a…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Most naysayers of manned space travel focus heavily on the danger to the astronauts and the massive amount of resources that are supposebly wasted in space. Some argue against government funded space programs while others argue against space travel in general, but all say they have good reason. Space travel is expensive, many people say that we could use this money to fix many of the world 's problems such as hunger and poverty. This is a very good rebuttal to space exploration as the problems with poverty are very important. Yet the amount of money that could potentially be made with space technology such as asteroid mining would help these problems far more than just redirecting current funds out of space.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of NASA

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Private space agencies are on the rise due to the fact that most of them tend to pursue projects that public agencies, like NASA, are not planning to focus on in the near future. One of the main examples concerning this issue is commercial space travel. The idea sounds really cool, but there are many dangers that come with it. Although it is a very expensive luxury, that few can afford, curiosity and excitement will help make this industry boom. The downside is that the little training that the passengers will receive compared to trained astronauts, will not prepare them if any malfunctions or even fatal results are to occur.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays