The Pros And Cons Of Solution To Climate Change

1398 Words 6 Pages
Over the past years, the question among many scientists and individuals is what can be a solution for climate change enough to make a difference. There have been reports where carbon dioxide levels in the air are at the highest seen for several decades. Nevertheless, the temperature has built on having an impact by being the warmest years since 2000. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change announced that there were more visible human impacts on climate in 1995 (Oreskes and Conway 3). The reason why they were able to make this conclusion was because they noticed that the greenhouse gases were the main component of climate change. Although, many scientists have reported the cause and effect individuals are doing against climate change, …show more content…
We do not limit the use of our resources. We waste water by letting it run or leave lights on even when they are not being put to use. We are in a century where there is such thing as solar panels, adding the cost is high, but that in the long term could save us thousands. Solar panels actually comprise many, smaller units called photovoltaic cells. Photvoltaic cells are getting electricity through sunlight by removing electrons from atoms to generate that electricity flow (Michael Dhar). The main reason why we need to fix these problems is because “carbon dioxide makes up the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions from the sector, but smaller amounts of methane and nitrous oxide are also emitted. These gases are released during the combustion of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, to produce electricity”(EPA 1). Since the most objects are made from these sources, we can actually reduce the gas emission by having a greater efficiency of power plants, using renewable energy, and advanced technologies. These solutions are supported by the Clean Power Plan which targets different states and the Environmental Protection Agency is in charged to make changes. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created standards and rules so that there would not be much harm. For example, people would have to invest in sources that would not use fossil fuel combustion, like wind, solar, hydro, and …show more content…
That is a problem towards climate change; if we can consume less and think green, less fossil fuel would burn to extract and transport goods around the world. We know that we need food to survive; however, there is a change that can be made when going grocery shopping. One change is to change plastic bags to reusable bags. “An estimated 12 million barrels of oil are used to manufacture the 30 million plastic bags that Americans use each year. That is equivalent to the amount of oil in our Strategic Oil Reserve. When used for bags, it is a wasteful way to deplete our oil supply and contribute to CO2 build-up in our atmosphere”(Plastic Bags and Climate Change). The first action that consumers worldwide can change is their products of packaging. As individuals we can use the reusable bags, even though there can be a one time charge on those bags, this small change can benefit us significantly. Nevertheless, there are people that are willing to make a change, but also people who will object to this proposal. People focus more on their wants than their needs so they will continue consuming unnecessary things. Moreover, people who grocery once a week usually have a large amount which means they would have to buy plenty of reusable bags which they are not willing to buy. Having free plastic bags from the grocery store is more convenient for individuals; however, they do not realize the damage that they are

Related Documents