The Pros And Cons Of Same-Sex Marriage

Decent Essays
The American culture is rapidly changing and so is the moral code. The government is able to make changes to the laws to accommodate the people. For example, Baker and McConnell sued Nelson for denying marriage application because the Minnesota law on marriage doesn’t mention anything of gender (“Same-Sex Couple”, 2008). Before gay marriage was legal there was no mention of gender on the law of marriage. For this reason, legalizing gay marriage should not have been an argument.“”But, for better and for worse, traditional marriage has already been destroyed,” said E.J. Graff, “and the process began long before anyone ever dreamed of legalizing same-sex marriage.””(“How Marriage” 2012). Marriage was already becoming more and more corrupt with …show more content…
However, they do not take into account that same-sex marriage goes against Americas cultural beliefs. When it comes to the topic of same-sex marriage, most people will agree that homosexuals take advantage of the leave-way the government gives them. For example, people should not have their tax dollars used to support gay couples when they believe it is wrong. According to Sprigg (2011), one of the main goals of gay couples is to take advantage of social security which is the biggest government entitlement program today. Some homosexuals are wanting to get more benefits from the government just because they feel self entitlement. This is a growing problem because people are getting mad that their tax dollars are going to benefit homosexuals. In addition, Spriggs (2011), also says that gay couples are demanding for any kids that are raised by homosexuals to be eligible for benefits when one spouse dies. While this is outrageous that the kids should get benefits just for their parents being gay, it is also unfair to the rest of society that is raising kids in a heterosexual home. In conclusion, Sprigg goes on to add that if the gay couples are allowed the full legal statues of marriage, then any employer who chooses not to grant benefits to homosexuals for a variety of reasons, then they will be …show more content…
For centuries America has had the same definition for marriage because it followed the moral code instilled into every person. Cristofaro & Wilkinson (2003), argues that, gay relationships are deviant and immoral, and only traditional marriages can fulfill Gods’s perfect plan for the reproduction of the human race. Gay marriage is a very controversial issue because of how immoral it is. Cristofaro & Wilkinson (2003) acknowledges that any political leader, no matter what their religion is, who is committed to promoting the common good of society should be following suit (para 10). The leaders of this country need to step up and realize all of the downfalls that legalizing gay marriage brings. In addition, Cristofaro & Wilkinson (2003), agrees that homosexual marriage is in no way similar or even follows God’s plan for marriage and family, marriage is holy and gay acts go against the natural moral law. God’s plan for marriage has always been to be between a man and a woman and to have a family together. Same-sex marriage goes against every moral law there is. Legalizing same-sex marriage will be one of the biggest downfalls for the American

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Same-sex marriage has been a huge controversy in the United States due to the fact people don 't know what marriage is, how it affects families, or what religion has to do with it. Marriage is when a two people of the opposite sex legally come together as partners in a relationship. “...marriage is a union that is meant to produce children for the continuance of society, and he rejects same sex marriage because it is incapable of doing this” (The Catholic Church, “The Catholic Church Should Never…” 2). People like to argue that everybody deserves the right to be happy. Even though everyone deserves happiness, people choose to be unhappy by turning their sexuality.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jordan mentions that there is a moral impasse over the question of whether or not homosexual acts are morally permissible. He believes many people think that they are and many think that they are not. In his argument, he later distinguishes the difference between engaging in homosexual conduct as a private matter and marriage as public one (April Elliot). Because people who are married are eligible for various public benefits that unmarried couples do not receive, the debate over same-sex marriage represents a public…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many gay couples rushed to get married once the state level bans were lifted. Now that the federal government has recognized gay marriage, many states counties are still failing to recognize gay couples right to marriage. The premise is that gay marriage is immoral and considered a sin in most religions, so it should be banned and marriage should only count between men and women. The argument is that people who are attracted to someone of their same sex has nothing to do with their ability to receive the same basic rights as straight couples. The argument is when denying same-sex couples the right to marry, is discriminatory and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why would someone consider making same sex marriage illegal when it is completely harmless and can also provide benefits to the country and its economy. Making same sex marriage illegal would be one of the dumbest moves that our country can make. A person 's marriage isn 't affecting anyone else and the only way it affects the country is in a positive way. Many religious people think same sex marriage is a sin and that it 's wrong. There are many things that are sins, but it seems as if those religious people ignore the other sins and only focus on homosexuality.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People who are homosexual were deprived of the same rights that heterosexual people had. Some believed that same sex couples shouldn’t have the same rights as opposite sex couples because many do not sanction this as a real relationship. For the most part in America a real couple is defined as a man and a woman. The government not only denied couples their rights but it also allowed and encouraged discrimination in the country. By not allowing same sex couples their right to marry showed that the government agreed with individuals that homosexuality is morally wrong.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It shouldn’t matter who is loving the child, whether it be two moms, two dads or a heterosexual couple. How can we say the heterosexual couple would be a better parent to the child? Gender plays no part in the ability to love therefore, we need to stop using it as an excuse when it comes to the law. The author of the second article I read would agree with the first author in the fact that a heterosexual couple does not have the ability to love a child more any more than a homosexual couple. The author of the second article would also advocate that the homophobia needs to stop in the United States.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1). People want marriage to be between a man and a woman but the government cannot define the word marriage. Same-sex couples feel discriminated by all the negatives they say about it. Many support the idea of civil unions rather than full marriage between gay couples. Civil unions are not fully equivalent to marriage and withdraw same sex couples of equal rights.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pro Homosexual Marriage

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lots of individuals within the United States of America believe that gay marriage may be a sin or shouldn’t be legalized as a result of it wasn’t “god set up.” In the Article “Why "Gay Marriage" is Wrong” They state “Same-sex “marriage” destroys the integrity of true marriage by turning traditional marriage into a species within the marriage genus” The legalization of same-sex “marriage” and its placement on equal footing with traditional marriage subverts and destroys the latter.” With that being said the gay marriage is a human right according to Article “What are the reasons for and against gay marriage” and the United Nation of Human rights, “human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of gender, nationality, ethnic origin and religious view etc. Everyone has the same right and freedom to do what they want, as long as it does not cause harm to the society, and decision made by others should be respected. Gay marriage is the matter of civil and equal rights, and the decision to get married should belong to the couple in love, and this should not be regulated by the government.” Even though many of people around the world don 't seem to be comfortable with homosexual relationships, the equality and dignity of gay couples…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Evidence from the article states “The Supreme Court's refusal to hear an appeal was a setback for the American Civil Liberties Union and gay rights group.” sated from Joan Biskupic, 2005. The court would just ignore liberals and the gay rights group for their reasoning's. Another evidence from the article states “The court's action taken as it rejected appeals in hundreds of other cases, sets no national precedent” stated Joan Biskupic. The court mostly focuses on gay rights as the important issue than other court cases.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, Ted Cruz explains that “marriage is a fundamental building block of our society” and he doesn’t believe in gay marriage or LGBT equality because it “an act of naked and lawless judicial activism” (HRC). This opposing argument explains that if gay people enter a relationship with the opposite sex, it can turn them straight. Moreover, republicans who do not support LGBT rights believe that homosexually is a choice and homosexual attraction is something that can be…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays