The Pros And Cons Of Reductions In The Cold War

1334 Words 6 Pages
The only glaring reductions in the cold war occurred at the end of the major wars like descalation for the war in Vietnam before 1973, and decrease in military spending when dress from the cold war to the post-cold war (Sawhney, DiPietro and Anoruo 2007). These reductions were temporary after the 9/11 attacks. The United States military spending escalated, and the country was spending more on the military by 2008, even more than it did during the cold war. In addition, before Iraq invaded Kuwait, huge cuts in the US defense spending appeared unavoidable (Mehay, Stephen and Loren 1990). Such reductions arose from the political changes in Eastern Europe that were widely perceived as reducing military threat to the United States and Western Europe …show more content…
There are critical stages in the foreign policy, meaning that normally move corporate policy meaning to favor military funding (Mehay, Stephen and Loren 1990). For instance, the events in 1979 in which the USSR invaded Afghanistan, the overthrow of pro-US Shah government by the Iran revolution led to the successful push by organizations to support increased military spending (Ali 2007). Moreover, the corporations that have fixed foreign investments in developed world, advocated for US militarization to protect their investments, especially during the revolutionary turmoil in the developing world. Similarly, the 9/11 attacks provided those who advocate for military spending, a good opportunity of expanding a policy of transitioning from the cold war to the post-cold war period (Sawhney, DiPietro and Anoruo 2007). The advocates of the US militarization who experienced substantial military spending cuts and peace divided was dividend since cold had …show more content…
(answer in red)), efficiency, and the national unity. Even though some of its arguments(What arguments?) seem plausible, it should be understood that in order to solve the effects to enhance the growth of the economy, they must be strong to demonstrate for the involved expenditure(English) (Nordhaus 2002). For instance, it can never be enough to claim that the military facilities such as satellites and roads provide various services to the civilians in a country (Mehay, Stephen and Loren 1990). It should also be shown that the indirect provision of such services through military spending is much more efficient than the direct provision (Stiglitz, Joseph and Linda 2008). Otherwise, civilians should be served directly.(What is direct and indirect provision? Military spending helps

Related Documents