The Democratic Party Analysis

Improved Essays
___In the history of the United States there were a lot talking but no actions on racism. Like every time when the blacks talk about racism, that they don’t want to talk about the racist groups that are black, yet the instead, the blacks are willingly accusing the whites of being racist. The blacks were freed two years before the Civil War had ended. I am not disputing any of the evidence that there were racist white people back then and now, yet that isn’t all of the story. Whites aren’t the only ones who are racist, but there are Native Americans, Blacks and others who are also racist. All sides of the racial lines that includes the whites ought to be blamed for perpetuating the hate, but it is the blacks and others who either are using their race as a weapon but not wanting to take the stumbling block out of their own path. In part of this story on racist people we can finally recognize that we need to finally solve this problem. To solve this problem is to tell both sides of the story. There are …show more content…
Yet it believed in state rights and constitution. This means that before the American Civil War, the Democrats had full control of the South. Also the Democrats were against any taxes that the northern, abolitionists and Republicans wanted because the people who were farmers wouldn’t be able easily get the slaves that they needed to work the land for them. In turn, they were arguing that the industrial north was too strong when it came to the tariff on slavery in the Senate and the House at the national level. There was an absolutely and true solution to get that able to get the representation in the national level, but the Democratic south didn’t want to hear of this. So they rebelled against the notion of having blacks freed nor equal to the whites. It is their beliefs were that in the Bible said that it is justified to have not just slaves but black

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln sought to unite the nation once more, upholding the nation and reestablishing the power over the South. Even in the slave letter did he point out that neither side really pursued to free them. The South wanted to keep them as slaves and the North wanted the slaves only for their army. Neither side sought for their independence from enslavement, only the slaves themselves fought for their own liberty and freedom. Even at the end of the war the South did not see the slaves as a free group of people, they resented the Union, the damage they inflicted on their homes and land and they abhorred the new working structure the government created.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction was suppose to help the citizens. However, it failed and left racial justice problems that people faced in the future. After the civil war, the North gave free slaves right to vote, which they were unfit to handle. Before his death, Lincoln was willing to forgive the southern states and bring them back in the Union. Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is extremely powerful towards the social position of blacks at the time. They were not considered people, so for the President of to let a black into the White House this shows that slavery is morally and ethically wrong, it also shows that a change will come because someone is now looking out for the black population. Lincoln’s ambition for the black population was colonization. He was going to give them the state of New Hampshire. Giving them New Hampshire would have been ideal because that way they could start their own society without color prejudice.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of these systems believes that slavery should not be allowed and has to rely only on free men, and the other wants to rely only on slavery (Foner 268). Of course, the intentions of one political system are humane and correct: every human has to be free and we have no right to own slaves, force labor, or prey on others. Although the struggle for the liberation of the slaves was only part of the war for power, it was a big step for humanity and particularly for people of color. The second political system, of course, did not agree with the first one. They could not just stop slavery.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French and British mills wanted the American cotton that was grown by slaves. Most Europeans abolished antislavery. Lincoln wanted to keep the border slave states and the Northern Democrats as his alliance. He did not have the emancipation of slaves on his agenda from the outset of the war. They had a strategy, the only way for slaves to get emancipation would be to make them be a part of the Civil War.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He hated the idea of slavery so much he would refer to it as an “evil institution,” but that was not his same beliefs with blacks. “Lincoln was no advocate of racial equality, but he did hate slavery.” (40) Lincoln’s views on slavery contradicted to his views on African-Americans mostly every time he spoke but coincided at some point. Stephan Douglas stated that Abraham Lincoln claimed “…The rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were promised to blacks as well as to whites,” here Abraham Lincoln is advocating for black to have the same right white Americans do. However, that is not what Lincoln kept saying throughout his career. In other speeches he degraded black people.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The South couldn 't afford to loose business from Britain and he assumed they would find an alternative source of labor. This issue was too hot and profitable for the South, so they were ready to defend the institution of slavery. Lincoln could have released the Emancipation Proclamation years earlier, but he knew this would cause outright rebellion. For this reason, he held off and continued to hope for a peaceful solution. This hopeful solution never happened and the Civil war began.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that former Confederacy advocates were trying to force them into another form of slavery. African Americans were convinced that the only way for them to remain safe in this country was for the Federal Government to pass laws to force the rebels to include African Americans. They wanted the Federal Government to use the military to stay and help protect them until an amendment was made that “prohibit[ed] the States from making any distinction between citizens on account of race or color” (“Address”). They also thought that having the right to vote would equip them to help themselves and help sway things in their favor. If they could influence the polls, they could influence the laws that were made in their state…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, no such code existed. What did exist was bigotry towards Blacks and a refusal to grant equal rights to freedmen. Livingston states that there existed a, “moral tension between the two propositions…the God-given natural right of freedom and the manmade political right to be a citizen of a certain country” (Livingston 18). This meant that the Northerners believed that Blacks should be free, yet not have access to the political and social freedoms in the United States—that was to be earned and reserved for white people. So, how did the North live with this tension?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays