The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Decent Essays
Plea Bargaining ought to be abolished in the United States criminal justice system. The reason for this is because it is unconstitutional, unethical, and immoral. Firstly, it is unconstitutional as it requires offenders to waive the rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th amendments: the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. Additionally, plea bargaining is unethical as it allows criminals to evade accepting responsibility for crimes they have committed. By giving criminals the notion that they do not have to take responsibility for their crimes, it gives them incentive to commit more violations of the law! This is because, through plea bargaining, serious criminals are often given

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If a person pleads guilty in their case to the charges, most likely through coercion, they lose these two basic rights. Most of the time, attorneys will talk about what a great deal the defendant would be getting if they plead guilty and they wrap it up in a pretty bow, but they, in the end, are denied these rights when agreeing to a guilty plea bargain. One would think that our government wouldn’t see that as fitting when we pride ourselves on giving every citizen the right to vote and the right to serve on a jury. But there is the political discrimination against anyone who has anything on their record.…

    • 2994 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Issues that Surround Plea Bargains Introduction When our founding fathers included the sixth amendment into the Bill of Rights, never had they imagined a large number of defendants surrendering those rights of a fair trial for a non-trial procedure on the basis of minimizing punishment. Today, plea bringing has become the essence of the criminal justice system. As a result, it has transformed the judicial structure into a system of pleas rather than a system of trials. While many will argue that plea bargain are necessary, it cannot be disregarded that they stand on unethical grounds.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining has many benefits which is why it is so common in the United States criminal justice…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William, I agree that bad faith bargaining is where the employer or union refuse to negotiate on collective bargaining. I think this wastes a lot of time when one of the parties isn’t willing to compromise on reaching an agreement. In fact, there are other ways an employer may try to bargain in bad faith. For example, an employer may try to incorporate an illegal subject of bargaining during negotiations. Although, it’s against the law, many employers still try to negotiate illegal subjects of bargaining.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining brings to light the unreciprocated power that the prosecutor has due to the nature of the criminal justice system in America. Plea Deals Demonstrate Prosecutorial Power…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When a defendant agrees to plead guilty the time spent on what would have been their trial can now be devoted to another defendant. When a defendant takes advantage of a plea deal, they are often granted leniency on their punishment compared to what they might have received if the case went to trial. An advantage for the prosecutor is not gambling the case in court and risk the case being dismissed, or the defendant found not guilty. Another benefit that plea bargains offer is saving the victim from testifying in court. Psychologically, testifying in court could be very traumatizing to the…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 10 of Examining Wrongful Convictions: Stepping Back, Moving Forward our authors Take a look into our plea-bargaining systems role into wrongful convictions. According to our authors plea- bargaining dispose of roughly 95 % of adjudicated criminal cases (Maguire, Tbls. 5.24.2008, 5.46.2006). Over my years of taking criminal justice course I have learned to so many innocent people actually plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. DNA evidence which lead to an exoneration is evidence of just that. Wrongful convictions produce out of our Plea Bargaining are much less likely to result in an exoneration due to the defendants own admittance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When less severe crimes receive the same or similarly harsh punishments as more serious or felonious crimes it creates an inequality within the courtroom. Removing plea bargaining would show results similar to the case from 1975 in Alaska where the Attorney General forbade prosecutors from plea bargaining with offenders. The results from this occurrence showed that the punishments for violent and felonious crimes did not change, but the punishments for less serious offenses and misdemeanors where dramatically increased (Rubinstein & White, 1978). The inequality created from the removal of plea bargaining would have drastic effects on the criminal justice system where the punishment for less serious crimes would be severely punishable but would have little to no effect on felonies and crimes of a violent nature. In the case from Alaska the primary objective was to hinder plea bargaining for the more serious offenders yet the outcome would eliminate the discretionary decision making of the courts and would lead to first time offenders of smaller crimes receiving unequal punishments for their crimes and reduced probability for parole (Rubinstein & White, 1978).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently, news emerged that John Horner, a father of three, received the minimum sentence of 25 years in prison for illegally selling $1,800 worth of painkillers to a friend. This is an example of how minimum sentencing causes people to be punished disproportionately to their crimes. Aristotle would call this an inequity our justice system. He defines equity as a “rectification of the law where the law falls short by reason of its universality.”…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of whether it is conceivable to totally take out supplication haggling in every one of its structures and assortments, I am not induced that it is alluring to do as such. In any case, I am no companion of request bartering in the unreasonable types of it that are obvious in the United States. More or less, the regularizing position I might progress is this: people accused of violations why should willing admit or confess ought to be allowed humble and settled sentence rebates in return for doing as such. Charge bartering, and that which frequently goes with and empowers it, vital cheating, ought to be unequivocally demoralized. Trial punishments, that is, extra additions of discipline allocated to people who practice their entitlement…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics