What are the pros and cons of the case?
The con on this …show more content…
These risks include poor information display disparity between user workflow in the EHR / clinical workflow, data entry errors created by copy-forward, and copy-and-paste, and electronic signatures (Palma, 2013). The National coordination of health information technology has created a guideline that will ensure the safety of patient’s medical information. These guides enable healthcare organization to address PHR safety in a variety of area. The quality improvement program within a health care organization is one way to ensure the safety of patients and professional workers. Healthcare organizations use their quality improvement programs to help identify areas for progress and develop enhancement plans. By using these quality measures, a healthcare organization can identify meaningful goal and a practical approach to pursue the safety of their clients and staff.
Do you agree or disagree with these processes?
I agree with this processes because given patients a full access to their medical record will increase the risk of liability against medical professional; for example, if a patient found a critical lab result that wasn’t brought to attention by the healthcare provide, this patient can bought up charges against the medical provider for negligence. Therefore, one can say that it is vital that health care organizations set limits on the amount of medical information patient can access through their EHR. What are challenges for patient that does not have access to all of the