Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts free society because those who choose to protest against these laws demonstrate that they are strongly opposed to said law, and they are not afraid to outwardly express their disapproval. Peaceful protesting is beneficial to modern society because it does not require police intervention, it abides by the 1st Amendment of the United States' Constitution (Freedom of Speech), and it provides evidence that there is criticism towards the law being protested against.
Peaceful protesting is a more effective way of protesting due to the lack of police intervention required. It does not initiate a necessity to send a force to stop the protest. Conversely, if the protest was more aggressive, police intervention …show more content…
By showing that there are people who wish to see changes made to the object of the protest, there is a much greater chance that change will be made. The more people that protest something, the more likely it is that the government or other organisations will decide to make the correction. without protest, it is totally impossible for the targeted group to know that the people are unhappy with the way the focus of the protest is. By protesting, people have a say in the laws of the land and how the government handles them. Without protest, no changes would be made. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." The government was made for the people, and so the people have a say in how it is run and the laws it passes.
In conclusion, peaceful protest is undoubtedly an effective way to resolve conflicts regarding what people perceive as unjust laws. By peacefully protesting, protesters prevent the need for police intervention, they use the liberties given to them by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and they demonstrate to Congress in a nonviolent way that some laws are not as well written as they could
Peaceful protesting is a more effective way of protesting due to the lack of police intervention required. It does not initiate a necessity to send a force to stop the protest. Conversely, if the protest was more aggressive, police intervention …show more content…
By showing that there are people who wish to see changes made to the object of the protest, there is a much greater chance that change will be made. The more people that protest something, the more likely it is that the government or other organisations will decide to make the correction. without protest, it is totally impossible for the targeted group to know that the people are unhappy with the way the focus of the protest is. By protesting, people have a say in the laws of the land and how the government handles them. Without protest, no changes would be made. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." The government was made for the people, and so the people have a say in how it is run and the laws it passes.
In conclusion, peaceful protest is undoubtedly an effective way to resolve conflicts regarding what people perceive as unjust laws. By peacefully protesting, protesters prevent the need for police intervention, they use the liberties given to them by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and they demonstrate to Congress in a nonviolent way that some laws are not as well written as they could