The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Conventions

Superior Essays
Our Constitution: Does it need to be reformed? Anybody who has ever run knows you can’t just randomly go out a run five miles without pain or taking breaks. It takes time, dedication, and patience to get into shape for running so that you are able to run those five miles painless and efficiently. Take that into consideration for a national state convention, you can’t just call for one and expect everything to run smoothly. It takes small steps in order to pursue great things. If the states were ever to obtain a convention, it would look like complete chaos. The last convention in 1787 was quiet, had closed doors, a vow of secrecy amongst the attendees, and people fighting for personal liberty. The Framers had different backgrounds and interest …show more content…
As Jefferson wrote the government ever became destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government (6). Today there is no point to abolish our government since it has succeeded for over 200 years. Though our government may have its flaws it is up to we the people to alter the constitution. In order to prevent chaos and to justify a peaceful constitutional convention; the solution is a “state convention”. An idea proposed by Andrea Billups was to have a convention for the states before calling a national constitutional convention. Here states could compare ideas and see what, if anything, they can agree on in amending the constitution (1). The states convention could be held every 5 years to where the states could reflect on possible changed for the constitution. If needed they could call for an emergency state convention if they see the Federal government is failing to do their job and something needs to …show more content…
Since we are a free nation, free to speak and to believe in what we want; there are so many different beliefs. This according to Madison is a good thing (5). Things will be less likely to change if we don’t address the problems we currently face as a country, problems through political parties and the government as a whole. Today the fault is that politicians are only in politics for personal gain and not for the people. If the states come to their senses and have a “state convention” and come upon common ground to help the people by amending the constitution to suit our personal rights, we shall have a constitutional. Still, taking one step at a time for a better nation. Until then the states need to come together and unify to add their input into

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The current Constitution allows for an amendment to be passed with ⅔ votes from both chambers of Congress and also with ¾ of the state’s approval or with ⅔ of the state legislatures calling for a convention. Sabato’s view on calling a convention is interesting in that his interpretation of a state’s petition to call a Constitutional Convention never dies as well as the visual of a light on, light off policy. Proposed amendments that a state switches it’s light on for will remain on until they reach 34 states with their lights on or until the state shuts it’s light off. This visual allows for a Convention to be called the moment the 34th state light went on, meaning a Convention could be called promptly. The one area Sabato says needs to be addressed is the lack of a standardized way of submitting applications for an amendment or convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America declared its independence in July of 1776, Congress knew this was their opportunity to create something completely out of the ordinary, that would have to stand the tale of time. The following year, the Continental Congress created the Articles of Confederation, which ultimately divided the federal government from the state. This article wrote the ground rules for America's regulation of currency, foreign affairs and guidelines for war, but left out the States, to decipher their policies individually (1*). Ten years later, the Constitutional Convention knew that America needed to be seen as a whole, even with the separation of power. The Constitution was written to unionize the States with the Federal government, and was finalized…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even Washington feels that a new constitution would be best. (Doc. F) The world sat and watched this new government forming in America, of course there were doubts from Europe but America, being the “teenager”, wanted to contradict their “Parent” nations and knew that if they worked hard enough they could prove the world wrong with their new Constitution that would last. The A. of C. was the item that caused Europe to doubt and for good reason too. Under its power our government could not even support itself because it lacked the power to tax without state consent. (Doc. C)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, all of the states acted as if they were independent (such as handling finances and defense). In order for the union to work better, the states needed to be able to concur and perform as a united country, especially in a period of emergency. Treating each citizen equally was a standout amongst the most imperative ideas to the Framers. The Constitution gives a national system of courts to ensure individuals' rights, and to hear cases including infringement of government law.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Government that was created after the Revolutionary war was too weak to mend the conflicts that were arising from the States; the Government was operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Philadelphia Convention agreed to help correct some of the holes in the Articles that had long since been determined even before the war. The Philadelphia Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from May 14th to September 17th in the year of 1787. Even though the Convention was actually proposed to revise the articles, James Madison, residing from Virginia, and Alexander Hamilton, from New York, had something entirely different in mind. Madison and Hamilton did not intend on revising the Articles but rather creating a new Government rather than fixing the one that was already agreed upon.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhode Island, a small state that was content with the current system of representation, felt that the Constitutional Convention was a conspiracy meant to overthrow the government. Like Rhode Island, "Patrick Henry, well-known for his leadership during the Revolution and for his speeches, refused to attend the convention because he believed it would result in the creation of a strong central government. Henry felt that the state governments needed to be stronger than the central government so that citizens' individual liberties could be protected" ("The Constitution of the United States). In addition, seventy-four delegates were appointed, but only fifty-five attended ("The Constitution of the United States"). Both Patrick Henry and other cases of absent delegates show that large divide between those who supported the current governmental representation system and those that did not.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . Here in the states, the topic as of late is the constitution; whether ratification of the document should happen, or whether it should not be ratified. The year is 1788 and the debate about the ratification of the U.S constitution is quite the topic among everyone including everyday citizens, in which everyone has an opinion on the topic, myself included. The U.S has the articles of confederation in place however, state delegates believed that the articles where weak, and something needed to be done to make the government stronger.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the American citizens should have the right to vote for a constitutional convention because over time we have seen changes within our economy, technology, population and military. The Constitution that was written hundreds of years ago cannot accurately address the complicated issues that our government faces today. I found myself agreeing with the views regarding the constitution being radically defective when it is being compared to today’s era. The framers of the Constitution themselves showed us that change is sometimes necessary. As Levinson states “they were, after all, a generation…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I says that a constitutional convention can be called if: • There is a two-thirds vote of both houses of the state legislature to put a convention question on the ballot. • The majority of those voting affirmed the idea of having a convention. • Amendments or revisions proposed by a convention go to statewide vote of the people for…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia between May and September of 1787. There were 74 delegates that had been elected by state legislatures to attend, but the convention had issues with attendance. The convention began on May 14, 1787, but it wasn’t until May 25th that the minimum number of 7 states needed for the meetings to proceed, or quorum, had been met. Only 55 delegates actually attended the convention, and of them only 39 signed the Constitution. The priority of the convention was to find a way to regulate how much power the states could have and to strengthen the government.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A constitution is a body of rules for which the Government regulates a state. A constitution regulates the relationship between the state and its citizens, it is sometimes a document with the principle rules that structure the functions of the Government as in the US Constitution . Constitutional conventions are considered to be historical customs that will determine what happens in certain situations regarding the constitution, or as described by the Cabinet Manual as constitutional practices that are regarded as binding in operation but not in law.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays