The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapon Proliferation

Improved Essays
The highest priority is to prevent terrorists from obtaining nuclear weapons against the US homeland or against US networks of forces overseas. As a matter of fact, roll back North Korea’s nuclear weapons proficiency and intercept Iranian struggles to procure nuclear weapons. Condense the probability that nuclear weapons will be used, whether by Russia, the U.S., or any other nuclear power, as a result of accident or misperception. Safeguard that any large-scale growth of civil nuclear power programs worldwide will ensue within the framework of new rules and procedures that can diminish the jeopardies of proliferation to added states and terrorists.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On December 7, 1941, Japan attacked the American naval base at Pearl Harbor. This attack forced the United States into the war, and just a day later the U.S. declared war on Japan. During the summer of 1945, Japan became a weak and destroyed country, but they were unwilling to pull out of the war. The United States gave Japan the offer to surrender numerous times, and if they did not agree complete destruction of Japan was coming. The United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a few days of each other.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With numerous amounts of detail and foreign affairs in the article, Coll uses this as a means to show his knowledge on the topic while still persuading the modest tone. Coll’s details on Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other countries about nuclear affairs is meant to educate the reader by giving him the knowledgeable insight on the topic being discussed in places other than the United States. Coll says things like, “more dangerous competition is gaining momentum in the Middle East,” and “ it may be impossible to prevent nuclear gridlock in the Middle East.” These statements show the scale of nuclear affairs and maximizes the importance of the matter. By using international affairs and showing the danger and problems in other places of the across the world, Coll hopes to show that the danger occurring in other places could eventually be occurring here if nothing is done to solve it.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that the debate on the nuclear bomb and limits in wartime was overall a weak one. Both sides struggled to get their points across and explain them in a way that someone could understand them. The facts and evidence were present for most of the debate, but the connections to make great points were not. Out of all the points I feel the con side’s claim that there was alternatives to the nuclear bomb was lacking the most. This was due to the fact that whenever they were asked for any supporting evidence or examples of alternatives to the bomb they would shrug the asker off and move on.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, during the final stage of the Second World War. The war was reaching its end and the allies’ forces were preparing an anticipated costly invasion on Japanese mainland. Meanwhile the United States continue its campaign of bombing many Japanese cities in hopes of Japanese Leaders to accept their unconditional surrender. Japan who ask the Germans for help, the United States an aware of Japans secret search for a nuclear weapons and Japan not having enough quantity to develop the an atomic bomb.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is said the idea that America should make an atomic bomb come from a letter sent to the president Franklin D. Roosevelt from Albert Einstein. In the letter, Einstein warned the president of German efforts to build a nuclear weapon. Einstein urged the President to monitor the nuclear developments in the letter. We didn’t exactly monitor it, but instead we made our own… :/ When Einstein asked to be monitoring the efforts of making an atomic bomb by Germany, President Roosevelt didn’t take any action until two years later.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is a bomb that could wipe out hundreds and thousands of lives powerful? During World War 2 the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from Japan got devastated because of the United States bomb invention which is the nuclear bomb. United States dropped the first bomb on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, according to the articles about 65,000 to 200,000 people kick the bucket. After the destruction of Hiroshima, Japan still did not surrender. United States dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki which made them give up, one of the article stated that 39,000 people were assassinated and 25,000 were injured.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the 6th day of August in 1945, the United States of America dropped the first Atomic Bomb to ever be used in warfare on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. Three days later, in Nagasaki, another was dropped. No one can contest that the events of these days were some of the darkest in history. However, what is contestable, is the validity of the United States decision to drop the Atomic Bombs. Some historians would argue that it was necessary to attain peace for all those involved in the second world war.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    August 6th, 1945 will be a day never forgotten in history. The atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki will always be connected to Harry S. Truman’s presidency, and is ultimately one of the toughest decisions a president has had to make in United States’ past. Justifying the situation was even more challenging. Having to address the general public after the fact added onto the affair, and will never be an all around positive response to the decision made. There will always be questions beginning with “what if?”…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The United Nations defines chemical and bacteriological weapons as chemical agents or chemical substances that are either gaseous, liquid or solid and are use due to its toxicity and harmful effects towards animals, plants and humans. Furthermore, bacteriological agents of warfare are living organism, that as well as chemical weapons, are intended to cause disease or death in animals, plants, and humans. The difference is that bacteriological weapons “depend for their effects on their ability to multiply in the person, animal, or plant attacked” (p. 203). The 1972 Biological Weapons Convention prohibited the use of biological weapons, and it was signed by 103 nations.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan was a sad and tragic event that killed thousands of innocent Japanese people. This fatal event could have been prevented with a single decision from our American Government in 1945. Our American government and President Truman decided that it would be better to take the lives of Japanese civilians, than to use a different plan that could have saved their lives. Michael Barnes is correct when he argues about atomic bombs being unnecessary to use in World War Two, because it took the lives of innocent people, it may have been racially motivated, and alternatives could have been made instead of using this weapon of mass destruction.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1945 to this day there is still a controversial discussion on whether it was justifiable or not to drop the atomic bomb. From saving american lives to annihilating japanese lives there is no justification to dropping the atomic bomb the way that the United States decided to follow. No matter how much the US would intimidate Russia, and how it was one of the only ways to have a completely unconditional surrender it, it wasn’t worth destroying all the lives of the villagers living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The starting development for the atomic bomb occurred when Leo Szilard, a Hungarian physicist, moved to the United states to research nuclear chains and the possibility of creating a bomb with the chain reactions.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission, in a fission bomb, or a combination of fission and fusion, like in a thermonuclear weapon. These weapons help make the world a more safe place, which is exactly why I believe that even though they are expensive, one Trillion Dollars over 30 years expensive, they are a necessary thing for today’s life. The production and use of nuclear weapons provide many jobs, help countries and nations be more or stay powerful, also make people not want to use them in a way. Nuclear weapons let countries maintain power or obtain power through military advantages. The weapons are weapons of mass destruction that nobody wants to mess with, causing other countries to respect the countries and nation that have these weapons.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America dropping the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th, 1945, was a very controversial decision and the opinions as to if the attacks were justified or not differ between those living in Japan and the U.S. The U.S’s act of dropping the atomic bombs was not justified because the long lasting health effects the bombings had on the population was disastrous, Japan’s army was inevitably facing defeat, and the mass destruction caused by the attacks lead to social damages throughout Japan. Although the atomic bombs did ensure victory for the U.S and British forces, it was a victory that definitely came with a cost; the significant loss of the Japanese population.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays