The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power

Improved Essays
Nuclear power us one of the biggest and best power sources known today. Nuclear fusion and fission makes a lot of excess usable energy. It produces a lot more energy than wind, solar, coal, or fossil fuels do, and they actually are better for the environment than coal or fossil fuels, producing helium rather than carbon monoxide.In short, nuclear power is a good idea because we can take care of the nuclear waste, the reactors have better safety measures and protocols than normal factories, is more cost efficient, and it better for the environment than conventional power.
This form of energy can keep us running cleanly, or without releasing dangerous gases like CO2. This form of energy also would keep us running for a lot longer than coal or oil or natural gases, as the littlest bit of fusion or fission releases a lot more energy than either of those do, and certainly more than either wind or solar power.
…show more content…
They say that nuclear wastes (as, or in, spent fuel) are an unresolved problem, or that the nuclear industry is responsible for horrific wastes which will endure as a nightmare for our grandchildren. People are also questioning the safety of these reactors. Another common argument against nuclear reactors focused on safety are that nuclear reactors are unsafe, that Chernobyl was typical, and result in a huge death toll, and that Nuclear reactors are vulnerable to terrorist attacks like that on the World Trade Centre in 2001, waste and spent fuel storage is even more so. Nuclear pricing also scares people.Activists also say that nuclear energy is too expensive, they think energy efficiency is all that's needed, with more use of renewables.They also say that Insurance companies will not insure nuclear reactors so the risk devolves onto government, which leads to massive government

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Question: Should Australia Partake Almost 40% of all enriched uranium begins its half-life in Australia but none of this is being used to generate energy in Australia. This is mostly due to the negative stigma that accompanies nuclear power. The fear of meltdowns, accidents and sabotage has lead the general populace to influence legislation against the use of nuclear power. Their fears, however, are unfounded as nuclear power is profitable, efficient and above all safe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people who live in Richmond don’t want to agree on constructing a nuclear power plant because of they are frightened that it’s going to explode and cause a lot of damage. In March 1979, an accident occur in The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania which allowed a small leakage of radiation surround the atmosphere. Many people would fear that it can harm their health, but in Document A it states that “the leak had no demonstrable effect on the health of anyone at the plant or in the surrounding area.” In other words, the small leakage didn't put anyones health and the environments’ in danger. By this, we know that building a nuclear power has more pros than cons, and that there is nothing to worry about.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This question is investigated using a dynamic simulation model of the public policy and social feedback processes that impact U.S. nuclear plant construction. The research reveals that proposed strategies to address public policy and societal issues, such as a new nuclear regulatory process and smaller, less expensive reactors, may not prevent cost and schedule overruns on the planned next generation of nuclear plants. Results point to the critical role…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear power has many positives to using them over any other type of power. An example of this is a reliable energy source because it can operate 24/7 for 18-24 months and it stops so the workers can refuel it. Another reason is this type of power does not release anything into the air and helps fight global warming because the power plants have avoided 64 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases. There's only been three major accidents produces less radioactive material than coal plants. Those are just some of the reasons why it is better than other types of power.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear energy has been tried and tested over the years and has been reliable. The technical feasibility is also in place, we already have nuclear reactors that are up and running, we even are in the development process of fusion reactors, which will be even more efficient. Unfortunately, this is where the viability of nuclear power starts to fall apart. In his TED talk Joe Lassiter, a senior fellow at Harvard Business School and a climate change researcher, says it best: “So what's holding new nuclear back? Outdated regulations and yesterday's mindsets.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With its cheap cost to produce and provide electricity and it’s flawless safety record, the benefits of nuclear power definitely outweigh its risks. Secondly looking at the effects of nuclear power on the environment, nuclear power is cleaner than many forms of energy. According to ehow.com, the two main byproducts of generating nuclear power are water and radioactive waste used as fuel for the reactors. while this may sound bad, waste storage is not a huge issue. Much of the nuclear waste is able to be recycled into more fuel products, reducing the amount of waste actually needing…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another plus of Nuclear energy is its footprint on the area of the earth is very small. Wind and solar take up quite a bit of area. Even though the wind turbine itself only takes up a small area, the land around it is pretty much useless except to let farm animals graze. Solar panels can use some useless space on top of buildings, but that doesn’t really amount to enough energy, so solar farms are built. A nuclear reactor can be the size of a semi truck, fit in a submarine, or the size of a house.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Developing countries and rising powers are using nuclear powers as their source of energy to provide for their expanding economics. (Nuclear Energy) Fear has run through the hearts of many Americans with the idea of a terrorist attack on nuclear power plants. Ever since the attack on New York’s Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, the vulnerable of the nuclear facilities have scared many Americans citizens. If an attack on reactors and facilities were to happen, the results would be end up being much worse than Chernobyl.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear power and Japan is just one of the many articles that want nuclear power shut down and never touched again. Nuclear power is a fairly simple and easy way to help the economy they use rods of uranium and heat them up by using nuclear fission (Two atoms coming together). When the rods get warmed up to a certain temperature the water surrounding the nuclear rods create steam, which turns a big turbine and creates electricity without creating carbon emissions. People shut down nuclear power, without even knowing how the energy can improve our well being and is created, is one of the problems that nuclear power is facing. It's not the people hating nuclear energy…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Should Nuclear energy be the primary source of electricity around the world? This has been a much debated topic for years. Though there are several countries that have taken the step to use nuclear energy, many haven’t including Australia. There are many positives, including the fact that Nuclear energy is clean and it also reduces Co2 that is released by fossil fuel, the nuclear reactors cost relatively low to operate and nuclear energy can save many lives in the long run. There are also many negatives regarding this issue, including the disasters that could be created if there were to be an accident, the threat of nuclear weapons and the radioactive waste.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They call themselves anti-nuclear activists, and most stand in firm resolution that nuclear power is not safe for the environment, humans, animals, or even plants. According to author of “Nuclear Power is Not The Answer” Helen Caldicott, It isn’t safe for workers, miners, or residents who work or live in the vicinity of nuclear power plants. She says that the exposure causes the increased risk of cancer, and other diseases. The results of switching to Nuclear Power would be catastrophic because in order for nuclear power to operate, it needs to release more radioactive materials into the air, water, and soil.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Future Of Nuclear Energy

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Simply by hearing the word nuclear people immediately steer away from the topic or dismiss it entirely. The word is tied to death and destruction but over all else fear. We think of the atomic bombs the U.S. dropped on Japan. We think of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and most recently Fukishima. All three melted down leaving destruction and untold consequences in their wake.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays