Nuclear Iran Essay

Improved Essays
Nuclear Iran

Iran is one of the leading countries in the Middle East and the Muslim world. The controversial theocratic regime which has been leading the country since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, headed by Ali Khamenei, has been eager to develop and acquire nuclear weapons, despite scrutiny from the international community and the United States. Ever since the revolution took place and the new regime was established, sanctions were put in place against Iran. Even though over the years the country’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons has brought more sanctions, restrictions and worsen diplomatic relations with the world, Iran and its leaders did not give up and eventually managed to obtain them, according to intelligence reports. This act violates the Non-Proliferation Treaty of the UN and many consider it an act of aggression and provocation against the rest of the world. However, one must look beyond the conservativism of the
…show more content…
However, the Persian state and its regime, similarly to any other around the world, is rational and wants to ensure its future existence and security. The presence of such weapons guarantee that no other state would dare to attack or invade them, including the United States, out of fear of nuclear war. This certifies that in the near future Iran will not have the same fate as its neighbors Iraq and Afghanistan, turning into a failed postwar state. On the other hand, a nuclear armed Iran also will serve as an offshore balancer for the United States, against all other middle eastern states such as Saudi Arabia and Israel. Undoubtedly the Persians were a regional super power before acquiring nuclear weapons, due to their big population, strong military and enormous oil reserves. Now following its nuclear armament Iran only solidified its position as a leader in the Middle

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It was a very confusing and perilous time for Iran. During World War II, Iran was under pressure of Britain and the Soviet Union. Iran's vast oil resources attracted Britain and the Soviet Union. Wanting to gain the oil resources, these two countries pressured Iran to have ideological dimension Revolution: "After the World War II, Soviet Union was refused to leave Iran as they had promised, instead of leaving they helped Persians Communist party set up a separate government in the Northwest of Azerbaijan" (Encyclopedia of World Biography 1). After many…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Shah modernized Iran’s military by purchasing large number of weapons and military equipment from the west, particularly from the US. US supported Saddam Husain in order to undermine the influence of Iran in the region…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With numerous amounts of detail and foreign affairs in the article, Coll uses this as a means to show his knowledge on the topic while still persuading the modest tone. Coll’s details on Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other countries about nuclear affairs is meant to educate the reader by giving him the knowledgeable insight on the topic being discussed in places other than the United States. Coll says things like, “more dangerous competition is gaining momentum in the Middle East,” and “ it may be impossible to prevent nuclear gridlock in the Middle East.” These statements show the scale of nuclear affairs and maximizes the importance of the matter. By using international affairs and showing the danger and problems in other places of the across the world, Coll hopes to show that the danger occurring in other places could eventually be occurring here if nothing is done to solve it.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is a step in the right direction in building a diplomatic relationship with Iran and will assist in stabilizing the region beyond its non-proliferation benefits. Tensions between the West, especially with the US, and Iran has created an avenue for dysfunction where the two regions have been involved in a zero-sum geopolitical conflict that has sought to undermine each other and diplomatic relations as a whole. The deal between Washington and Tehran moves beyond its non-proliferation pact as a primary incentive and makes peace in the region a possibility by opening the conversation and dialogue between the two States. A Middle East where diplomacy is the norm will have significant prosperity in…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    All The Shah's Men Essay

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Following World War II, many different countries were left in ruins and began to rebuild, especially in Europe. Iran specifically, was recovering from being invaded by Soviet and British troops after being a neutral country in the war. In the book titled All the Shah’s Men, we get a more focused glimpse on Iran and all the foreign powers influencing the nation. Iran was ruled as a monarchy until 1979, and each king or emperor is given the title of “shah”. Every Shah ruled until death or they were overthrown.…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over the course of the last 40 years, the United States has been tangled in the political environments of both the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq. This entanglement is rooted in the contradictory involvement of the United States in the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980’s. In the war, the United States supported both sides of a conflict in which it officially wished to end, but the resources it provided may have actually allowed the war to continue. One should ask, “Why would the United States pursue contradictory policies in a war it claimed to want to end?” The contradictory policies are grounded in the fact that the United States aimed to effectively prevent a victory from either country, ensuring the security of its interests…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one state were to rely on another for its security and defense, that state would not be sovereign and autonomous, but dependent upon the protector state. However, in order for states to maintain their sovereignty and autonomy, as well as achieve security, they strive to reach nuclear capability. Nuclear capability is an attractive trait to states because it is the ultimate tool in the arsenal of deterrence. Although there is no way to effective way to prevent a state from achieving nuclear capability, it is still pursed. For instance, the United States is in the mist of preventing Iran from reaching nuclear capability.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the United States first developed the nuclear bomb it had secured its place as the most powerful nation in the world. There was no need for deterrence back then because nobody else had acquired nuclear bombs yet. Essentially the United States could get away with nuking anyone without any major consequences and without sending any ground troops. Only a few planes were needed to do the trick. It was only a matter of time before another state pursued the same technology and within a few years, the USSR had succeeded.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 CITE WHY IRAN). It could mean the complete opposite. In addition, Iran shows retaliation against the United States, Israel and other states by supporting terrorist groups and militants throughout the Middle East (CITE). This definitely makes Iran questionable with their intentions because the state is already nervous about being undermined from others. The Iranian government appears to support the use of nuclear weapons in order to pressure and intimidate other states, which is not a responsible way to use such an intense weapon.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Was it Necessary to Drop the Atomic Bomb to End World War II?” The United States of America was and still is one of the biggest countries in the world when it comes to power and demand. Developing such a weapon as the Atomic bomb that can scare and destroy anyone and anything, was in United States favor. But was it really necessary to use a weapon this powerful and dangerous? Yes, I think so. This essay is about my and the two professors Robert James Maddox and Tsuyoshi Hasegawa point of view; if it was necessary to drop the Atomic bombs to end the war.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Weapons

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Fission was used in the original atomic bombs, and fusion is most commonly used today. This is due to the fact that the amount of energy that can be released from fission is limited, whereas fusion can theoretically release an unlimited amount of energy. Fusion is the same type of reaction that occurs on stars, thus obviously very powerful. Fusion occurs when two atoms are “fused” together and release a stray neutron. Thermonuclear bombs are much more powerful, and produce significantly greater amount of gamma…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Iran Culture

    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Allegations of Iran sponsoring terrorism caused the U.S. to enforce extensive trade sanctions on the country. Along with the previously mentioned allegations, Iran’s nuclear programs made the country a target of more trade sanctions. Iran has received international objections over its nuclear program. Iran, however, stands strong that the nuclear program is peaceful in nature and will not discontinue enriching uranium (Iran in perspective,…

    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays