Co2 Research Paper

Great Essays
Imagine that you have just become the ruler of a small country, a country so small that it only has a total population of four people, yourself inclusive. In this country your main concern is feeding all of your citizens. Everyone requires 3 meals a day and it is your job to provide them with the resources they need in order to get those meals. The resources for one meal costs three dollars a piece, but you are told that for twice as much the provider will cut the cost down by 10 percent for every year that you purchase from them. You are faced with a choice, do you decide to just purchase the resource at its regular price, or do you make the investment to make the resource much cheaper in the future. The dilemma that you face …show more content…
The amount of CO2 that is emitted by the power generation sector is predicted to double by 2050 (OECD Environmental Outlook). Relative to natural emissions, anthropogenic CO2 emissions are actually quite low. The problem isn’t that they are too high now, but that the amount emitted is increasing every year, and eventually will hold a significant share of the environmental influx of CO2. The average atmospheric CO2 concentration on earth is about 400 ppm [Parts per Million], by 2100, the concentration could be as much as 550 ppm to 950 ppm (Brahic). Not only is this increase in CO2 output have adverse effects on the environment, but it also serves as an indicator that the combustion of fossil fuels release waste products into the environment. Contrary to one general idea, large pockets of fossil fuels are not pure. There is no such thing as a giant pocket of 100% crude oil in the ground. Fuels are always found mixed in with other materials. Burning these fuels results in a plethora of waste products, as the chemical reactions break apart bonds and release heavy metals, Volatile organic compounds, SOx, NOx, and particulate matter into the environment (Government of Canada). These pollutants are considered waste products because it is no longer economically feasible for them to be utilized. Along with waste materials, fossil fuels also waste a great deal of energy. Fossil fuels are about 35% efficient as to how much of the energy released is able to be put to work (ECO FYS). Renewable energy however, would be wasted weather or not we put it to work, so rather than wasting energy, renewable energy actually recovers energy from what would already be considered waste. Energy is a hot commodity and wasting it is in no way a logic plan and only further stresses an emphasis on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Renewable energy technologies may be expensive but after many years their economic benefits will appear. The expensive price of renewable energy is paid once while the money spent on fossil fuels is increasing time by time. For examples remote countries who live on river sides wouldn’t have ever been able to produce electricity if not for the dams they have built. It is also known that fossil fuel’s prices are continuing to get higher. In 2000 each gallon of diesel was worth 1.629 dollars.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main reason of compatibilism is better than incompatibilism is that compatibilism think that freewill and determinism are compatible with each other and with this concept the conflict between freewill and determinism is abolished. Whereas, incompatibilism producing confliction between freewill and determinism by saying that they both are opposite to each other. But, compatibilism was unable to give proper definition of freewill. Compatibilism…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Hydro fracturing”, also known as fracking, is a controversial oil and gas extraction technique used to access fossil energy. This process literally smashes shale rock with millions of gallons of water and chemicals to access the gas. This process is very unnecessarily harmful in many ways. It hurts the environment and climate, it hurts the health of humans, and it causes dangerous earthquakes. This practice only benefits the big businesses and oil companies, and should be stopped as soon as possible.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people don’t realize that one of the ways to reduce global warming is by saving energy. Generating energy doesn’t happen on its own; in fact we use combustion of fossil fuels to produce energy. The word combustion by itself will give you a heads up of understanding the relation between energy and global warming. Combustion means burning; and burning fossil fuels is very important to us because it is our source of energy, but if we don’t help in saving energy, factories will burn more and more fossil fuels to produce more energy for us. The more the factories burn fossil fuels the more pollution it will cause, meaning more greenhouse effect due to the waste gases that is produced, which can cause a climate change.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Studies have shown that if the United States alone generated eighty percent of the nation’s electricity that by the year 2050 “global warming emission from electricity production could be reduced by approximately eighty-one percent” (USC 2). Most of the Earth’s sources of energy people use today are not renewable, so by using renewable energy, the Earth will supply sunny skies and strong winds when people need it. It was estimated in 2012 that sources of renewable energy, such as wind energy, have the ability to supply 482,247 kilowatt-hours of electricity a year, one hundred times more than what the United States uses annually (USC 3). To produce the…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, they emit massive amounts of greenhouse gasses when they are burned, drilled, and transported, pollution is harder to contain, and much more. The processes that are involved in bringing the minerals and fossil fuels to market are similar. They both are devastating to the environment, both are having to dig deeper to find their product making it more expensive, dangerous, and impactful on the environment, and much more. If I had to choose between the two evils, I would chose nuclear only because its byproducts are easier to contain and maintain. Although it would be very expensive and would require constant diligence and oversight, I believe that well regulated nuclear energy would be much less destructive then fossil fuels.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Climate Nasa’s article on nuclear power, coal and gas are far more harmful to humans and the environment (http://climate.nasa.gov/news/903/) than nuclear power. Coal and fossil fuel burning emit harmful air-pollutants that have caused climate change and risked human life. In addition, replacing cheap energy resources with nuclear power plants can avoid tons of greenhouse…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When a fossil fuel refinery comes down to pump some oil or dig some coal they clear out land and destroy the habitat around them. As in ' 'Fossil Fuels Pose Double Threat to Wildlife" there are two types of threats direct and indirect. The direct causes are the ones that you can visibly see like the noise pollution, the clearing out of land, destroying animal habitats, and polluting of our atmosphere. The indirect causes though are even more deadly and last even longer like soil pollution or water pollution which you can 't measure at the time and also the introduction of invasive species which since they have no natural predators can go in and destroy the natural wildlife. Nuclear is very compact so you don 't need to strip mine for the ores we use demilitarized uranium from old USSR warheads which is less damaging to the surrounding environment.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Impact Of Fossil Fuels

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States’ switch to renewable energy is not just the more practical option with its lower costs and greater efficiency, it is necessary to halt the global repercussions of the pollution from fossil fuels and end America’s reliance on unstable countries. Fossil fuels are leading this country on a path toward global destruction that can only be avoided if the switch is no longer delayed. Fossil fuels have many drawbacks that make them the weaker choice like cost, availability, and less energy output, but the most alarming and urgent drawback is their pollution. When fossil fuels are used in cars, factories, etc. they release toxic chemicals…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay Nuclear

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even though the amount of waste produced, is far less, it is highly toxic and nuclear waste disposal is a big challenge. Most nuclear reactors are situated in densely populated areas and safety is a big concern. Nuclear disasters like Fukushima are catastrophic in nature and cause damage on a global scale. So we have to ask ourselves, is Nuclear energy, really, a green solution? What are the ethical values we should be consider when taking decisions that affect millions of people around the world?…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays