Mercy Vs Justice

Improved Essays
It is widely known that mercy and justice are polar opposites, however this can be put into question. Throughout human history many scholars have been giving insight on this ongoing debate, Thomas Aquinas once said that “Mercy without justice is the mother of dissolution; justice without mercy is cruelty”. This quote can easily be applied to modern day, as court systems can easily be one-sided and biased. Through the analysis of multiple court cases such as Gideon Vs. Wainwright, Ricky Jackson and Jimmy Dill it is evident that the balance between mercy and justice in modern day court systems are essential to the fairness and well-being of the people. Both justice and mercy are complementary as they are both rendered useless without one another. In the court …show more content…
Although he was involved in a shooting and ended up seriously injuring a person, he was first charged with aggravated assault. While in prison, the victim died due to the improper health care according to evidence provided by forensics. Yet the court ruled that Jimmy Dill is to be punished by death penalty changing his sentence from prison time to death. However it is to be noted that “Mr. Dill should have been shielded from the death penalty because of his intellectual disability”-(pg 284). This punishment was unjust and cruel as Jimmy was suffering from mental illness and also was not proven to be the actual cause of the death of the victim. Also capital murder “requires the intent to kill, and there was a persuasive argument that there was no intent to kill in this case and that poor health care caused the victim’s death”-(pg 284). This is a core example of what may happen when mercy and justice aren’t properly balanced in the ruling phase in court. Jimmy’s case was reviewed by many critics and many have said that Jimmy was tried unfairly and was clearly under the protection of previous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court then found that it is cruel and unusual to impose the death penalty on the mentally ill. This is specifically apt when considering Smith’s case because he was not mentally ill during the before, yet he does suffer from mental illness. If applying Ford to Smith’s case, then his sentence should be vacated, as his mental capacity could diminish and he could not be aware of his punishment of the reason for him receiving it. Atkins v. Virginia (2002) also concerned the use of the death penalty on those who are not mentally competent. Daryl Atkins was convicted and sentenced to death for abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, what must be looked at his how many cases that weren’t affirmed and dispirit the capital felons mental state they were put to death anyway. In these articles the scholars make perfect sense as to why they death penalty is pointless. This punishment is simply inhumane and it contradicts everything this constitutions states. In many cases the eighth amendment becomes a major factor: cruel and unusual punishment. This ac is also in violation of the right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If a criminal has done awful things, do they really deserve to live? Do we really want to waste oxygen on these human beings that clearly have no regard for other human life? Many of the people on death row have been offered second chances, but squandered those chances. If they mess up more than once, then what is the point of locking them up and hoping that they learn their lesson. Well, killing them will not solve the problem, it would just push it away for a little while.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Morton Court Case

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    to Is capital punishment wrong? yet, I will focus on Does the adversarial process harm plaintiffs and Defendants?. I will argue that the legal system does harm plaintiffs and defendants since, it has failed to protect and enforce the rights of individuals. Innocent people are going to prison or in other cases guilty individuals are not going to jail. The legal system also harms individuals, as the process itself tends to favor those with the most resources.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States death penalty needs to be changed. The death penalty works kind of but it is not consistent. The inconsistency of the Death Penalty has made the people blind to the positive effects. The death penalty had been a huge controversy for many years. Many people in America believe the death penalty should be abolished, because humans should not have the right to take another 's life.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He points out that executor jobs are just as degrading and uncomfortable as any other job can be, and also makes a strong statement on how the death penalty is a way of catharsis that directly affected victims and communities get. These points are effective in favor for the death penalty. However, Mencken’s argument that death row prisoners, after running out of appeals, should not have to wait long terms of time until they are put to death is not reasonable. These murderers should be allowed to suffer alive during the long wait because of their horrible…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judy Harrow comments on the case, “ May we all find lovers as devoted!”(Harrow 9). Although Delury was saving himself and his wife years of emotional, mental, and physical pain, the act he committed was illegal in the ruling of the court. Harrow wants to use this case as a demonstration to explain why the legalization os assisted suicide would benefit everyone. Not only those suffering with an illness have to worry about the consequences, but also their loved ones, if they choose to aid them in death. Many laws, like the one that was used to file charges against Delury, prohibit a hasty death for individuals in…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, they are not 100 percent positive that the drug can be painful, there are cases that say Midazolam feels like you are “being burned alive from the inside out”, says Tierney Sneed. This being said, people believe the death penalty should be abolished altogether due to the fact, that it is cruel, inhumane and painful to many inmates and suspects. (Muhlhausen) As well as making you suffer, the death penalty can be a risk of executing a wrongfully convicted criminal. (npr.org) This has happened in many cases as the judge accuses the wrong suspect. (Mulhausen) Making Midazolam illegal will draw many people’s attention in letting them know what could go wrong with this penalty.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We should treat mental health patients with the same respect and dignity that we do with other patients on death row. However, I do believe that mental health patients should get a reduced sentence. Herbert should have gotten life in prison without parole because he did kill two people, even though it was accidental. The Supreme Court held in Ford v. Wainwright, in 1986, that executing the insane and the intellectually disabled couldn’t be executed. However, inmates who are mentally ill and not insane have no such exemption.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Canada

    • 1284 Words
    • 5 Pages

    And do the murderers do not know the consequences of murder? If murderers know the death penalty to crime and still keep doing that, that means the death penalty is not an effective way to deterrent them; if murderers do not know that they will be sentenced to death after committing crimes, it means that the death penalty does not achieve as the desired effect. Amnesty international (2000) has declared that there is no clear evidence to show the death penalty can reduce the criminal rate. As a result, the intimidation effect of death penalty is useless to avoid the increasing criminal rate. Additionally, some people also note that the retaliation is not a negligible moral issue on the capital punishment.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays