Mcnaughten Rule Should Be Abolished Essay

Improved Essays
3.7 million homes were burglarized each year between 2003-2007. 1 million of those burglaries a house member was present. 266,500 they became violent, either the owner had a gun in defense, or the burglar had a gun. How do the culprits get away with doing a crime like burglary? It can relate to duress, that you were forced to rob or vandalise something, or a loved one was going to get hurt. Others are too insane, they don’t know right and wrong. Such as McNaughten Rule, could be if they have a mental defect. These circumstances are justified for not taking responsibility for an unlawful act.
As long as the act isn’t murder, you can claim duress. Duress is when a person is forced to commit a crime, if not something of theirs will get hurt. For
…show more content…
Not for the best, since he assassinated a prime minister Sir Robert Peel. McNaughten was very delusional and displayed symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Instead of going to jail for murder, he was sent to a psychiatric institution. He stayed there until he died. The reason McNaughten got away with murder was because, the court acquitted his charges for being insane. This would later be known as McNaughten rule, helping people that don’t understand right or wrong. Today we have an irresistible impulse test. It 's the standard for insanity, it tests if the defendant has a mental disorder or defect. Also, if they cannot control their behavior. With this ruling, it doesn’t let you roam free in society, but you go to an institution. One rule that is too broad was the Durham rule. It helped with many mentally diseased people. Instead it was abused by criminals who would rule their addiction to alcohol, or drug addiction. Instead of helping the people who couldn’t comprehend right or wrong, it gave a loophole for many …show more content…
They don’t go to jail and not get the treatment they need. Although they are acquitted of their charges, they go to psychiatric treatment. I do agree that if you do not know right from wrong, how can you take responsibility for an action. Over the years there have been new rules were put into place like American Law Institute Rule (ALI). ALI is a new standard for insanity, that sees if the defendant lacked responsibility for the criminal act. These rules instead of helping the ones that need it for circumstances, have been loopholes for criminals. To stop criminals from using any rule they created “guilty but mentally ill” in 1976. This was a great way to stop criminals who wanted to perceive as mentally ill. If you were found guilty but mentally ill, you would receive psychiatric care while being incarcerated.
While there are many reasons to commit unlawful actions. Such as speeding, to even robbing your neighbor. Duress if one can prove the necessity of the crime, they can be excused of the crime. When one has a mental defect and doesn’t understand right from wrong. They should receive their treatment, but instead of being incarcerated be put into a mental

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court then found that it is cruel and unusual to impose the death penalty on the mentally ill. This is specifically apt when considering Smith’s case because he was not mentally ill during the before, yet he does suffer from mental illness. If applying Ford to Smith’s case, then his sentence should be vacated, as his mental capacity could diminish and he could not be aware of his punishment of the reason for him receiving it. Atkins v. Virginia (2002) also concerned the use of the death penalty on those who are not mentally competent. Daryl Atkins was convicted and sentenced to death for abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Insanity Defense A serious American contemporary issue is the use of the insanity defense. The insanity defense is when a person being accused of a crime are legally sane but were not in the right state of mind when the crime had taken place. The insanity defense is a chance to help the person who was not in the normal state of mind. This defense is a compromise of society and law because not all mental ailments can be proven or disproven. The benefits of the insanity defense include rehabilitation, preservation of life and finding out if the person is a real criminal or not.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a possibly that most mentally challenged criminals are incapable of understanding the nature of their crimes or actions. (2009 Allen, Clubb) Mental illness defense can sometimes be more harmful than good to the defendant in the sentencing proceedings of a capital trial. Some juries believe that mental illness is no excuse or they believe that the defendant could be faking it. In addition, some people believe that an individual could have gotten help before the occurrence of criminal violence. Mentally insane defenses can lead juries to think that the individual is a danger to society.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity defenses are mostly used in murder cases such as the James Holmes case or other serious felony charges. Insanity tests that are used determine legal and moral liability which determines the validity of an insanity defense. Andersen and Gardner states, “When a defendant is found insane at the time the crime occurred, the court enters a judgment of not guilty by reason of insanity, and the defendant may never again be tried for that offense”(Gardner and Andersen 116). The insanity defense also discusses the charge/defense of guilty but mentally ill that has been adopted by certain states in the United States. According to Criminal Law Twelfth Edition, “The incidence of people who are found not guilty because of insanity and who then…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history. The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Media Stigma

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This self-perpetuating stigma has glaring consequences. Stigma prevents individuals from seeking treatment. Those with mental illness would rather confess to a crime than to plead that they are mentally ill, because being labeled with a mental illness is a worse sentence than going to jail (Redlich). However, media is not the only contributor to the problem, caretakers themselves act as barriers to those recovering from mental…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Rehab

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There is a considerable amount of disagreements about supplying rehab to those who are arrested instead of letting them go through jail time. Rehab would often be supplied to those that are arrested that suffer through drug addiction. Therefore, the topic is of high value today because it examines a possible way to reduce crimes throughout countries. There are a variety of arguments on the issue, such as that it is unsafe to use rehab as a reason to put a criminal back into public. Some believe that rehab does not work or that jail already teaches enough lessons to convicts.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This overcrowding though, is forcing prisons to let go of real criminals because of lack of space. If drugs were legalized this could reduce those drug users sentences, and allow more space for people that commit serious crimes. It is safer to let go of drug users because they are less likely to cause harm to other people. Drug users are only hurting themselves, their health. If violent criminals like rapists are being let go of, there is a high chance they will do a crime like that again.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Morton Court Case

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    to Is capital punishment wrong? yet, I will focus on Does the adversarial process harm plaintiffs and Defendants?. I will argue that the legal system does harm plaintiffs and defendants since, it has failed to protect and enforce the rights of individuals. Innocent people are going to prison or in other cases guilty individuals are not going to jail. The legal system also harms individuals, as the process itself tends to favor those with the most resources.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does having a mental disorder make serial killers want to kill more? The conflict theory might be the best way to explain the expected outcomes and research question as it tells about how serial killers and mental disorder do nothing but make society more negative as the days go on. People who kill are usually not classified as having a mental disorder. If they were found to have a mental disorder then, when they would get to trial…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays