This is clearly suggest in Source 2 saying, "Utah law banning them from using automated cameras to collect images, locations and times of license plates is a violation of their own free speech rights". Claiming the plates on a car is public information and the only reason there are plates on cars is to get information on the car. If the companies want to take photos and "express" themselves through them and use the photos for business then is according to the first admendment it should be allowed. This is a strong case to use because if a goverment can not follow one of the biggest foundaton law of America, than what kind of country is it really? Source 2 put the government in a hard place to make and choice for the individual rights of the right of a companiy and stay within the fist admendment guideline. Definiantly, Source 2 presents and strong point to their
This is clearly suggest in Source 2 saying, "Utah law banning them from using automated cameras to collect images, locations and times of license plates is a violation of their own free speech rights". Claiming the plates on a car is public information and the only reason there are plates on cars is to get information on the car. If the companies want to take photos and "express" themselves through them and use the photos for business then is according to the first admendment it should be allowed. This is a strong case to use because if a goverment can not follow one of the biggest foundaton law of America, than what kind of country is it really? Source 2 put the government in a hard place to make and choice for the individual rights of the right of a companiy and stay within the fist admendment guideline. Definiantly, Source 2 presents and strong point to their