ISIS, it stands for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and is an extremist group that rules by Wahhabi and/or salafi law. ISIS is a well-known terrorist group that is known for kidnapping western journalists and aid workers as part of their tactics. In Arabic ISIS the well-known terrorist group is also called daesh. Hillary Clinton said that “It can’t be an American fight” but she was wrong, because if not us then who would take the fight to ISIS?
ISIS has an operation base that is in Iraq and Syria it is meant to escalate more and more dangerous terrorist offensive. Like any other successful terrorist attack if left undefeated it will cause an influence that will expand its terror. Allies such as France would make a big difference against the attacks on Paris with the help from the United States with 20,000 United States soldiers. ISIS is already planning an attack on Washington. Some will assume that our defenses are so powerful that it would be impossible for them to attack Washington. But we can’t rely on what we think we can do, we have to do a lot more than we did in 2001, because the forces facing ISIS are weaker and less able to work together …show more content…
The terrorist attack in Paris should call for a supported emotional response throughout the west is understandable to get a helping aid against ISIS. Especially when just thinking about the use of force the importance is not to “do something” but it’s to do something about it at an affordable cost. However our military actions were so ignorant that it has made matters worse. Any offer for escalating the ongoing war against ISIS should take into a report that the results achieved through previous interventions in the great Middle East. In that regard the record was quite clear. In Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, among other places, intervention has produced not stability, but
ISIS has an operation base that is in Iraq and Syria it is meant to escalate more and more dangerous terrorist offensive. Like any other successful terrorist attack if left undefeated it will cause an influence that will expand its terror. Allies such as France would make a big difference against the attacks on Paris with the help from the United States with 20,000 United States soldiers. ISIS is already planning an attack on Washington. Some will assume that our defenses are so powerful that it would be impossible for them to attack Washington. But we can’t rely on what we think we can do, we have to do a lot more than we did in 2001, because the forces facing ISIS are weaker and less able to work together …show more content…
The terrorist attack in Paris should call for a supported emotional response throughout the west is understandable to get a helping aid against ISIS. Especially when just thinking about the use of force the importance is not to “do something” but it’s to do something about it at an affordable cost. However our military actions were so ignorant that it has made matters worse. Any offer for escalating the ongoing war against ISIS should take into a report that the results achieved through previous interventions in the great Middle East. In that regard the record was quite clear. In Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, among other places, intervention has produced not stability, but