The Pros And Cons Of HB 142

Improved Essays
North Carolina passed a bill on March 30 to repeal a contentious law that had required individuals to use restrooms at public facilities according to their biological sex rather than their gender identity.

The new bill, HB 142, was passed with a 70-48 vote in the House, and a 32-16 vote in the Senate. North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper signed it into law on Thursday (March 31).

HB 142 repeals what has been known as the “bathroom bill,” or HB 2. It also restricts the state government — and all of its agencies, boards, and universities — from regulating access to restrooms, showers, and changing facilities “except in accordance with an act of the General Assembly,” as well as prohibits local governments from passing or changing laws regulating
…show more content…
“It’s not a perfect deal, but it repeals House Bill 2 and begins to repair our reputation.”

North Carolina faced much backlash since HB 2 was passed in [insert date]. Most notably, the NCAA announced it would no longer host its championship basketball games in the state after North Carolina passed the law.

The NCAA released a statement on April 4 stating that North Carolina will be included in its process of selecting the site for championships, and that the previous decision to host the 2017-18 championships in the state will remain.

“We have been assured by the state that this new law allows the NCAA to enact its inclusive policies by contract with communities, universities, arenas, hotels, and other service providers that are doing business with us, our students, other participants, and fans,” the NCAA said in the statement.

“Further, outside of bathroom facilities, the new law allows our campuses to maintain their own policies against discrimination, including protecting LGBTQ rights, and allows cities’ existing nondiscrimination ordinances, including LGBTQ protections, to remain effective,” it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This law prohibits a "person who commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex. " The Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas was ruled that states cannot make laws banning homosexual sodomy. These laws are unconstitutional and a violation of the right to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently, Trump rescinded the federal transgender bathroom bill and gave the states…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How do I begin to explain the world today? It’s funny, when I consider how advanced American society is, yet at the same time fail to recognize some of our real problems. For example, in the past 15 years, we’ve experienced a rise in the number of mass shootings and gun violence in the United States. From the murders at Fort Hood in 2009, to the tragic murders of 20 school aged children and six adults at Sandy Hook….in the period from 2007-2013, the FBI has documented 16.4 incidents per year. When I ask why this has happened, my first response is we need more gun laws, a unilateral ban on firearms across the United States.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Acc Relocation Case Study

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The relocation would clearly impact the ACC, which created the legislation. The NBA has changed its All-Star Game by moving it away from Charlotte in the past week out of hostile response to the heated law House Bill 2, but the ACC commissioner named John Swofford mentioned at his conventions there is no speedy proposal to shadowing the suit with the league’s football championship game. There was some long discussion regarding this matter in May at their spring meetings, and in that period they made the determination concerning where the championships would be hosted for the ’16-17 year, Swofford mentioned to ESPN. In this situation they are doing what is best for them and not the NBA but Atlantic Coast Conference.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Lee Kleinman said “Senate Bill 6 is defiantly an attack on our long-standing position against discrimination," (Widomski). Further in the article talks how about seventy seven percent of voters approved in an amendment that would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity and expression” to a list of employment protections (Wilonsky). At this point I was still confused about this law was even being carried out now since so many people voted but then I got to this quote from Dan Patrick saying "allowing men in women's restrooms is both mind-boggling and appalling." apparently after this him and republican Sen. Don Huffines launched a petition to “Keep Men Out Of Women’s Restroom.”…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2007 a law to ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thurgood Marshall Case

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is an important ruling as it emphasized the difference between private acts (not restricted) and state actions (limited) in relationship to the Fourteenth…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most severe of these bills is a bill from Florida “that would make it a misdemeanor for anyone to knowingly enter a bathroom that didn’t match the sex on their driver’s license or passport” (Steinmetz). This would affect numerous students and people in general who cannot change their gender on their official documents yet. One could get a misdemeanor just for using a public restroom facility. In addition to the Florida bill, “Republican state lawmakers are backing a bill that would require students in Kentucky to use the facilities that correspond to the sex listed on their birth certificate” and if this passes this means a student could sue for $2,500 if they encounter a student whose biological gender does not correspond with the restroom facility that they are using (Steinmetz). This is yet another bill that could fine a person, specifically students, for going to a restroom when students are the least likely to be able to change their gender on government…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone who is not transgender and allowed to use the bathroom of their gender legally, is automatically privileged. Never will non-transgender individuals ever walk into the bathroom of their gender worrying about legality. Never will a non-transgender walk into a public bathroom and be judged, leered at, or observed with a careful eye. The New York Times editorial board article “Transgender Law Makes North Carolina Pioneer in Bigotry” writes, “By promoting the ludicrous idea that transgender women are inherently dangerous, the law endangers citizens who are already disproportionately vulnerable to violence and stigmatization.” According to this source, the law reinforces the narrative and oppression against transgender people.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other high court decisions tentative in the year included whether Title IX applies to institutional organizations and intercollegiate sports. This article from “The Phi Delta Kappan” also affirms that Title IX has been beneficial to and responsible for the educational achievements made for women so far. Another excerpt from a volume of Harvard Law Review discusses cases preceding 1997 about whether Title IX applies to peer sexual harassment in public schools. Published 20 years after the passing of Title IX, this document argues that if employees of the school can be protected or prosecuted based on Title IX infringement, than students…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Safe Carry Protection Act

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With this Act the boards of education determine whether their faculty can carry guns into their schools. This creates division among school boards but if they do allow it for their district teachers can carry weapons, but if it’s not on them it must be locked away. Along with this if it is deemed acceptable in their district those who carry must go through certain training first and learn Georgia’s laws on defending yourself. Still under the Act unauthorized individuals cannot carry weapons or firearms not only in school buildings now but school safety zones, school functions, or the buses. The law puts the power of protection into the board’s hands.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    SB 4 Argumentative Essay

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It outlaws so-called “Free Speech Zones” on college campuses. Free Speech Zones refer to designated areas within a college campus one is allowed to organize, protest, and display any form of message no matter how uncomfortable or offended a passerby may get from witnessing the message. This absolutely guarantees one’s first amendment rights inside any college and prevents it from being confined to only a small percentage of the available campus space. The Act also allows an individual to be able to sue colleges if they feel that their first amendment right has been violated. Prior to this law, the degree to which speech has been censored varies depending on the university.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Crime Laws

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The reason why conservative groups interfere is because of the certain groups that are being protected these people are afraid that the lesbian and gay community would interfere there peoples beliefs. This law will bring just to those that are harassed for the way they are. This law is a fair law, it will provide better protection to…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This law is affecting many different communities and the state as a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We need this law to make our community equal still today because we have still not accepted everyone for who they are. Even the government goes against our rights and tracks our cell phone and Internet history to try to keep us safe from terrorism. This isn’t a bad idea, but it does go against our personal freedoms, and many times it targets certain…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays