The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Superior Essays
All around the world, people believe in the right to bare arms. Individual rights allow people to have certain item without getting in trouble because of laws. The second amendment allows for everyone, the right to bare arms. Congress has many views on gun control, like crimes involving guns. Those are the three main topics people focus on when talking about gun control. The people have the right to bare arms because it is in their constitutional rights. Therefore, people believe it is the government's jobs to enforce these laws.
Many people believe the “government is entitled to conclude that the social casts of permitting weapons in schools or government buildings outweigh any individual right.” The government has been on high alert since
…show more content…
"Arms" should be construed at a level of abstraction that takes into account contemporary understandings—and Justice Scalia found constitutional relevance in the fact that handguns are "overwhelmingly chosen by American society" today for purposes of self-defense. With this part, all three keys parts come in place, individual rights, second amendment, and the government. Justice Stephen Breyer's “dissent detailed various restrictions on firearms that existed during the colonial period and concluded, "Irrespective of what the Framers could have thought, we know what they did think"—that restrictions on firearms were consistent with the Second Amendment(Karlan 10).” Now, more restrictions are being brought out by the government, making people very angry. “The ‘Gun-Show Loophole’ means that there are no background checks when purchasing guns in a private transaction(ontheissues.org).” Now when weapons are purchased, the places where they are purchased do not keep track of records or do any background checks either. All of these topics lead to someone who has a different feel for …show more content…
“The FBI found that in 2013 arguments (such as romantic triangles, brawls fueled by alcohol or drugs, and arguments over money) resulted in 1,962 gun deaths (59.9% of the total)(gun-control.procon.org).” Statistics come in play now since they matter more to everyone than laws. And now law enforcement comes into play to, Jeffrey Voccola, Assistant Professor of Writing at Kutztown University, notes, "The average gun owner, no matter how responsible, is not trained in law enforcement or on how to handle life-threatening situations, so in most cases, if a threat occurs, increasing the number of guns only creates a more volatile and dangerous situation(gun-control.procon.org)." This quote is stating the average person who owns a gun is not trained to to properly use a gun or when the best time to use it. Law enforcement and statistics play a big role in this because this determines how people react with certain topics. Many people cause controversy by bringing up statistics, pretty much causing a huge fight of screaming and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Firearms act of 1934 greatly restricted the purchase of automatic weapons, rifles, and shotguns (Cottrol 67). The people of the United States felt a sense of relief when an initial precedent was set for the Second Amendment. This was one of the first acts restricting the purchase of weapons, this was seen as the first action taken by the government to begin a trend of gun control (Cottrol 67). Gun control means political efforts to regulate the manufacture, sale, possession, and use of various types of firearms (“Gun Control”). When the government took action and in a way initially supported the side of viewing the amendment as a collective right it took the disagreement between the two sides to a new level.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On one side you have those who are for gun control as gun violence has become a serious problem in America. On the other side of the coin you have American citizens who believe strongly in their right to bear arms as it is a staple of the rights all Americans are granted. In the US, there are roughly 283 million guns in civilian hands. Although this in and of itself does not seem particularly damaging or harmful to anyone, the amount of deaths because of these guns shows otherwise. It has been reported that over 30,000 people are killed each year as a result of gun violence, ⅓ of these deaths consist of people under the age of 20.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control DBQ Essay

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A logical assertion can, and is, made that certain background checks are desirable in order to decrease the amount of deaths caused by guns. However, we need to understand the effectiveness of these checks, that many who want a gun will go to any means to acquire one. In a study conducted by Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick of John Hopkins University, over 80 percent of criminals evaluated were not lawful retail purchasers of firearms – as most acquired their weapons from sources such as family members and street sources (Source 1). Additionally, we need to understand that certain firearms illegal in certain states are brought in from other states in which they are legal. Both observations show that while increased background checks and illegalizing specific weapons do have an effect, they may only slow those who will do anything to have powerful armaments.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those four subjects are highly controversial, so this short paper has been written to tackle them all the best that it can. This paper was written to remain credible and truthful to the best of its ability. The highly debated topic of gun control and the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America has…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    More than one hundred thousand people are involved in a shooting each year in the United States of America. (irrelevant). Gun control has become a major topic in the last couple of decades in America. It’s a very controversial issue around the world, in communities, and in some families. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is very clear and stated soundly, that the right to bear arms by the people shall not be infringed upon. Therefore, this paper establishes that gun ownership is indeed an inherent right. The application of gun control measures by the courts, therefore, should be based not only on the first clause of the text of the Second Amendment, but on both clauses, which are separately interpreted. Therefore the decision by certain courts to determine that civilians vacate the right to own guns independent of the state is unfounded and…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this may be true, the Second Amendment has become the object of some study itself. Correlating with the predicament of whether it recognizes the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms. Opposing to, whether the right belongs solely to state governments and empowers each state to maintain a military force (Vandercoy, 2016). At the same time, it leaves the question unresolved of what the founders really had in mind when they conscripted this cutting edge declaration. With attention to that, the phenomenon has soared into heights beyond a meer debatable matter.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms” (The Bill of Rights). This constitutional right supports gun owners across America, and proves every law abiding citizen in the United States of America has the right to bear arms. When there is a bombing we blame the bomber, when there is a car accident we blame the driver, so why when there is a shooting do we blame the gun. More gun control should not be put into effect on law abiding citizens.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays