The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Improved Essays
A woman is in her home late one evening when she hears a racket of noise in her garage. She runs up to her safe, grabs her gun, and urgently goes to see the commotion. When she opens the door to the garage she is found face to an intruder who also bears a firearm as well. He goes to pull the trigger just as she does so herself saving both her well being and the well being of her family inside. The woman cannot imagine how her family and herself would still be protected without bearing a gun in safety.
Since the year of 1791 citizens have had the right to bear arms (guns) under the Second Amendment. However, as more incidents of gun violence have occurred and continue to occur over the years, safety concerns have arisen immensely. Due to this,
…show more content…
With firearms, citizens are better able to protect themselves or others in times of this harm or violence. Though, when gun control laws are enacted, restraints on personal protection and use will come into play. “According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police cannot protect everyone all of the time. 61% of men and 56% of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and families.” (“Should More Gun…”) As mentioned in the article’s statement above, harsher gun control laws will only restrain individuals from needed protection. In addition, the same article mentioned that “Gun ownership is an American tradition older than the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment; more gun control laws would infringe upon the right to bear arms.” (Should More Gun…) In the year of 1791, the Second Amendment was founded stating that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” If gun control laws are enacted this amendment will be infringed upon. Further, the United States Constitution will also be infringed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It is prudent true to state that the issue of gun ownership is an old tradition of United States than the nation itself, which is fully protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Therefore, it would be a clear infringement to the constitution if we shall have more gun control law in place. In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, June 26, 2008, Justice Antonn Scalia opined that the Second Amendment protects and safeguards fully a person right to own and posses a firearm regardless whether he or she is connected with rendering service in a militia.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “How US Gun Control Compares to the Rest of the World”, John Donohue shares his stance on the controversial issue of gun control in the United States. Mass shootings are only a small part of the overall violence in America, however, as time passes, this issue continues to worsen and is becoming a greater problem in the US than in other countries. Other industrialized nations have harsher gun laws that have prevented many different types of crimes. US states and cities have enacted laws to require unused guns to be safely stored, which helps keep guns away from criminals and children. People argue that stored guns can’t be used to defend themselves, but studies have proven that guns are very rarely used as self defense mechanisms.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regardless of the form of gun control, it takes away our right to own guns; the Second Amendment of the Constitution. In contradiction to what several politicians say how firearm related events and deaths are at an all time high, it is actually at the lowest it has ever been in over twenty years. According to data provided by CNN, the number of non fatal firearm related incidents has decreased by a whopping seventy five percent while…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time after time, the issue of crossing constitutional rights has prevented action. But it has also left the door open for more attacks. Without any federal regulations, attackers have been able to walk into a gun store and walk out with a firearm. The longstanding referendum of guarding one’s constitutional right to bear arms has put the country at risk of future shootings. Shooting after shooting, time has proved that the Second Amendment has clearly caused more harm to the nation and its people than it has benefited them.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment protects the right of individuals to possess a fire arms although the government retains the power to enact a broad range of firearms laws, including restrictions on possession by felons, or in places like school or government buildings. The “right to keep and bear arms” remains a puzzle to Americans and has become a strictly political matter. The second Amendment does protect us from us from potential danger in the society and it is still relevant today. There are two main issues related to gun issue that needs clarifications: one, the issue needs to be addressed from the perspective of a good individual citizen and not from a politically viewpoint. second, the amendment appears to trumpet the people’s right to own firearms and has taken its place in the forms of interest groups such as National Rifle Association(NRA), which opposes all government attempts to restrict gun ownership although the amendment implies that relationship must exist between the private gun…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns In Schools

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Within the Bill of Rights is the second amendment, which states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Bill of Rights). Fast-forwarding trough time from the past there have been obvious need for change with gun laws…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As every well-informed American knows, the right to bear arms is the second of our constitutional amendments and therefore cannot and should not be infringed upon by federal, state, or local law. However, when full blind practice of this amendment is actively implemented, it becomes easier for guns to be purchased for use in illegal activity including, but not limited to: poaching, armed robbery, murder, assassination, and mass shootings. In reaction to this issue, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Gun Control Act of 1968 in order to cut down on gun related criminal activity without burdening law-abiding citizens in the purchase of firearms for legal activities such as: hunting, target shooting, or personal defense and also to prevent the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws Debate

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    More than thirty-thousand people die from gun violence in the United States each year. (Brady Campaign) With the countless number of gun deaths and high-profile shootings, such as Virginia Tech’s, Aurora’s, Columbine’s, and Sandy Hook’s, it is understandable that people want stricter gun laws. However, even in the wake of these shootings, new gun laws have met with resistance and have failed to become law. While guns can be dangerous, it is still true that the U.S. Constitution’s 2nd…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, opponents of gun control say that a strict restriction on guns is a violation of their Second Amendment ’s right. In order to find a conclusion to the debate, a balanced approach to gun…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s time is gun control. There have been many shootings since gun laws have changed. Gun control laws restrict the possession and use of firearms. Since 1993, the rate of crimes committed with a gun has decreased up until 2013, and then the numbers went back up. There was a time where carrying a concealed weapon made communities safer, but today, communities are not safer just because people are allowed to carry a concealed weapon.…

    • 2592 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control in America has become a topic of debate lately by questioning our use of the second amendment and how we use it. Firearms can be used to cause mass homicide in schools (ProCon.org), or guns can also prevent burglary and theft in a gun owner’s home (Safewise.com). In short, guns are predominantly more beneficial to have than not to have (even with the chance of the owner misusing the firearm) because of the assurance and security it brings to the average gun owner. First off, gun control has distinct negative outcomes that sway the minds of people to not support more gun control. In a poll of roughly 21 million people, 54% said no to increased gun control in the poll above; this shows that more than 8% of people do not want any more gun control (isidewith.com) .…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of gun control has been around for many, many years. In recent years, more and more people have been murdered with guns. 13, 286 people were killed due to guns in 2015. Because it is not the 1800s anymore, the 2nd Amendment needs to be amended to fit the current situation of America. Weapons such as assault rifles should not be available to the public.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment was necessary due to the fact that after becoming free from British rule, they needed every adult male they could muster in order to form the United States Militia. This topic is often highly debated, which is why former Associate Justice, John Paul Stevens, has brainstormed five extra words to add to the Second Amendment, consequently ending the confusion. Stevens believes that adding “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia” (Stevens 1) will accomplish this goal, as it clearly states that the right to bear arms applies not to the personal use of firearms, but the use in service. Overall, implementing strict gun laws would not only help reduce death, violence, and crime in the United States, yet will provide greater insight to the Constitution, continually pushing people’s quest for…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Google.com). This is the Second Amendment, which has captured a lot of people 's attention. This is because of the argument over whether there should be stricter gun control laws to protect civilians, or if there should be less. The argument for more gun restrictions say that if less people are able to get guns, or if it is harder to obtain them, then there will be less mass shootings. The argument for less control is that if more people have concealed weapons then they can stop shootings from getting worse, and will deter criminals because of the higher percentage of retaliation there will be.…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays