The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Improved Essays
The liberal call for gun control as a “solution” to mass shootings has increased since the horrific and homophobic massacre in Orlando on June 12. In certain respects the call makes sense. Should we live in a society with fewer guns? Of course. Does the right wing’s commitment to guns reek of double standards? Definitely. Are gun lobbies such as the National Rifle Association absurdly powerful? Absolutely.
However, the current emphasis on gun control shifts the focus away from the core cause of the Orlando massacre: the injustice of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people of color. It also ignores the historic and ongoing racialization of gun legislation, while realizing a narrative that legitimates state violence by the police
…show more content…
Since the Orlando massacre mainstream articles, analyses, and even cartoons about how easy it is to acquire a gun have expanded. Gun control was a major theme at the June 13 Stonewall Inn vigil in New York City. A call for politicians to “get the guns off the streets” was met with strong applause from the four-thousand-plus crowd, and every elected official who spoke commended the virtues of gun control and their record on the issue. Yet most politicians have shied away from discussing the social and political attitudes shaping homophobia, the actual motivation for the attack. Several members of Congress conducted a theatrical “sit-in” on the House of Representatives floor to push for a bill banning those on the “no-fly” list from purchasing guns, but those same representatives have had little to say on the climate of hate leading up to the massacre.
The Pulse nightclub massacre was a site of homophobic violence against
…show more content…
They will argue that mass shootings pose a more immediate threat than the problems described above (homophobia, racism, the injustices of policing and American militarism). Mass shootings are horrific and traumatic for the communities that experience them, but finding and challenging the root cause is the only meaningful way to address them. Gun control in its current incarnation is a classic liberal solution. It’s a paint job for a crumbling house. Widespread approaches to gun control treat mass shootings as isolated experience rather than central features of a divisive capitalism that pits working-class people against each other and promotes violence as a method of expression. Assailants have had a lot more in common than guns, they often found themselves at the nexus of alienation, atomization, and xenophobia. If the Democratic Party actually cared about our safety they would create legislation that addressed poverty, racism, and homophobia. But they do not and they will not. It is up to us to push for a society where Orlando would never again

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    PARKLAND SHOOTING SURVIVORS VERSE THE CONGRESS CHAMBER ON GUN BRUTALITY By now, we all recognize the lethal anecdote of the Parkland, Florida shooting. A 19-year-old who had procured multitudinous weapons traipsed into his high school that he was expelled from and shot and killed 17 undergraduates and educationists. And even though these shootings are developing more and more continually, I reject to get used to it. I equally reject to assume the implication that nothing can be done.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My rhetorical ecology’s primary goal is to articulate the many levels of statistical data surrounding gun control in the US. I start off the presentation with the Bill of Rights and immediately provide commentary from individuals who played a fundamental role in the foundation of the United States. Then, I state current gun control laws currently in place. From here on out, I expand on specific analytics: mass shootings, other deadlier killers, and total firearm violence. The audience this argument appeals to is people who react to gun control regulations after mass shootings occur.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    School Shootings Are Not Enough for Stronger Gun Control Laws The Jonna Semeiks article “We the People Confront Sandy Hook” discuses many different factors that contribute towards explaining why school shootings and gun violence are inadequate to inspire stronger gun control laws. The deaths of children are not enough to offset the strong ties that American society has towards guns as a symbol of freedom, which causes people to respond with internal defense mechanisms that numb the pain of these tragic events instead of feeling a need to take corrective action. Semeiks presents a valid point that gun control reforms are needed; however, in order for that to happen anytime soon, the American people will need to largely shift their attitude on this topic. The author provides several examples successfully supporting that main idea.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Adam Gopnik’s essay “Shootings,” he shows concerned with the growth of gun violence in the United Sates, and the lack of action from the government in making strong and restrictive gun control laws to prevent further deaths and massacres by guns. Gopnik was even more concerned on how easy it is for people with a history of mental illness acquiring weapons that were only made to kill people. By comparing United States with others countries which have restrictive and tightens gun control laws, Gopnik shows how deaths by mass shooting has decreased in those countries since the government started to taking action, and they never had to experience the same incident as severe as the first one. The main purpose of the Gopnik essay is to persuade…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate on gun control has become an increasingly routine debate. The Washington Post states that “advocates of tighter restrictions on firearms invariably call for better background checks, banning large ¬capacity magazines and other measures that would make gun deaths less likely. Gun zealots answer that even the most common-sense reforms aren’t relevant because they wouldn’t have prevented the mass shootings that keep horrifying the nation. The forces of “no” keep Congress from acting”. FBI Director James B. Comey argues that the government did not do enough in preventing Dylan Roof, a 21 year old racist who used a .45 caliber pistol to attack of Charleston’s Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church from a South Carolina.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After doing quite a bit of research on this controversial topic I changed my mind. Specially in the moment when we hear of another mass shooting, no one is to blame but the people who pulled on the trigger. When you sit down and think about it leaving all of your feelings out of it and just looking at the facts you can clearly see what the problem is. There is a saying that goes, if guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article, “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner,” Justin Cronin, a liberal award-winning novelist and a professor at Rice University, describes the experiences he has underwent during in his life that caused his beliefs of gun control. Cronin wrote this article after a shooter entered an elementary school and killed 27 innocent people. He believes it is too easy for Americans to buy guns, but he also believes many people who are against guns do not look at the reality of gun control. They want to make unreasonable changes that are near impossible. Cronin is knowledgeable when it comes to guns since he owns six pistols that are all semi automatic.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professors from Bloomberg School of Public Health Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick reveled intriguing results from their study. “In addition to the 31,672 people killed by guns in 2010, another 73,505 were treated in hospital emergency rooms for nonfatal bullet wounds, and 337,960 nonfatal violent crimes were committed with guns. Of those 31,672 dead, 61 percent were suicides, and the vast majority of the rest were homicides by people who knew one another”(shermer). It is now know that some Americans in society take their freedom to bare arms for granted. Every day some Americans are being shot, wither it is out of jealously or hate, their lives are on a balance of life or death.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The Guns and Soul of America,” David Brooks, Oct. 6, 2017 The piece “The Guns and Soul of America” by David Brooks, questions the seemingly obvious belief: that as there is an increase in violent deaths and mass shootings involving privately owned firearms, there should also be an increase in stricter gun laws, and a downturn in popular opinion regarding gun ownership. Instead, in his column, Brooks writes to prove that the opposite is the case - that as the instances of mass shootings occur, there is then a correlating pattern of states loosening gun control laws. He then presents a larger issue that may be at hand: that gun ownership, or the opinion against it, represents an American’s “values and identity,” that the argument for or against…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They don’t discriminate, they terrify people, they kill you! This is a big controversial topic. This is the defense that liberals use when it comes to gun violence “Gun Control”. The lengthy debate, which I will explain in this essay, will demonstrate why gun control simply does not work.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This proves how increased gun control will not be the answer to end violent shootings. If someone was to break into your home, chances are that calling 911 will not save you. Self-defense techniques do not provide adequate protection against an armed attacker, so the only…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays