The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Decent Essays
In recent times, the controversial debate on gun control has been growing exponentially. Many people questioned how should firearms be obtained, and who can get firearms. On one side of the argument, people are fighting to restrict guns with the belief that it will reduce the number of shootings and crimes. While on the other side, people are fighting to regulate guns with the belief that the right to bear arms will reduce shootings and crimes.
Banning guns will just take guns from the hands of good people not from criminals. Criminals do not care about gun laws, they are dishonest people. Criminals will always find a way to get guns. For example, a criminal can purchase firearms through the black market. Without a background check or having to be registered it makes no difference if guns are allowed or not. In fact, the more gun control there is the happier the criminals will be knowing that no one around them will have a weapon. Therefore, why would shootings happen at schools? If a criminal like Adam Lanza, the sandy hook shooter, knows that schools are gun free zones, they know no one will fight back. As a result, restricting guns will not prevent shootings, it will make them more deadly.
…show more content…
While banning guns, why don't they ban tobacco too? Statistics show that tobacco kills more than 14x more people than guns. When guns are banned people will resort to other ways of killing such as knives, explosives, and cars. After the JFK assassination, the government passed multiple gun laws, and what happened the following year? Murder rates doubled. Another example is the UK. They banned firearms and after that, they had an increase in murder. Ultimately, banning guns will not make the crime and murder rates go down, but

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Amend The Second Amendment

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment Some people in the United States of America feel that the Second Amendment should be removed due to crimes in this country. Others feel that if the amendment was removed, the brutal death rates would increase, creating more harm than good. Although most people believe that guns can be dangerous, we should not amend the Second Amendment because people need guns for home and self defense, guns are a reliable source to help put food on the table, and they are also a way to help keep terror groups and enemies out of our country (Gun Control Controversy). In today 's world, America has become a horrific place filled with crime and murder.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Did the framers of the Constitution intend for every U.S. citizen to have the right to bear arms? It is scary to think about what would happen if everyone in a mall had a gun. Under the Second Amendment, American citizens have the right to bear arms and that right should never be violated. Although that is true, gun control is needed because thousands of US citizens are killed every year from the misuse of weapons.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” However, many believe that it has been, in fact, infringed upon. Gun Control laws have been passed along with many other measures to make it hard for someone to buy and own a gun. But is it necessarily a bad thing? The Government has compromised on the Second Amendment, but it is for the sake of security of the people and the nation.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William S. LaPierre from “Crime is the Basic Problem, Not Guns” claims that, “America has a crime problem, not a gun problem.” Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public especially for our children. If a new gun law were to be put in place, one that would state that guns are illegal, crime would most likely not change. People would be left defenseless against criminals.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Loren Gutentag, writer for Newsmax Magazine, Carson suggests arming kindergarten teachers. He says, “[g]unmen tend to pick places that are gun-free zones” (Gutentag), and proceeds to say that he would be more content sending his child to school if he knew that the teacher was trained with a weapon (Gutentag). Although the Carson takes the wrong approach in his idea to arm more people, he is truthful when saying that gunmen tend to pick places they are less likely to get shot. His solution to the issue is wrong, however, because it is shown even in recent events (such as the Oregon shooting) that guns being around the problem don’t stop malicious acts from happening. The right solution, containing more background checks and holding more people responsible, could have stopped the shooting from happening, because the shooter might have been able to obtain a weapon, proving fatal to many people, based on his mental state.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well Regulated

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If guns are banned and the law-abiding citizens are obeying the law, then when the criminals attempt to commit a crime, it is going to be much easier for them to get away with it because the average citizen is not going to have any way to protect his or herself. According to NRA’s mantra, “[the] only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” (Hughes). So, not only does banning guns make it easier for a criminal to commit a crime, but it also disseminates any chance of stopping the criminal from committing the…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you look at the facts, firearms are over 300 times more likely to stop crime, than to cause a crime. If guns were to be taken away from these citizens, murder rates would rise, and the chance to stop crime would drop immensely. In 2015, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in San Bernardino, California. Despite this states intense gun control, an attack was still carried out.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On an average day in the United States 93 americans are killed by gun violence. There are also 1000’s of cases that involve a child being injured or killed by a stray bullet every year. Does this mean that guns are dangerous or does it mean we are using guns for the wrong intention? There are many reasons people use guns but like everything else some people use it for good and some for evil. Since the United States can't take away all of our guns I feel there should be some guns you should be able to purchase at your local store for self-defense or hunting and there are also some guns in which you should go through heavy background checks to be able to purchase.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This was not the original purpose for guns, guns were used to protect what people want to protect. Banning guns would not reduce the crime rate in America, since criminals and psychos obtain weapons illegally anyway, all the government would be doing is preventing citizens from getting guns to protect themselves. If the government decides to ban guns, they…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Does Gun Control Reduce Crime? Gun control law has been one the most argued topic in the past decade in United States. Crime is widely viewed as a major issue for every society, government always tried to find solution in order to reduce the crime and violent rates. That is why gun control law and gun ownership has been argued intensively. However there has been a question, did gun control law reduce crime rate?…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays